| Literature DB >> 21990342 |
Chang Wang1, Thanh Wang, Wei Liu, Ting Ruan, Qunfang Zhou, Jiyan Liu, Aiqian Zhang, Bin Zhao, Guibin Jiang.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Polyfluorinated iodine alkanes (PFIs) are important intermediates in the synthesis of organic fluoride products. Recently, PFIs have been detected in fluoropolymers as residual raw materials, as well as in the ambient environment.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21990342 PMCID: PMC3261944 DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1103773
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Perspect ISSN: 0091-6765 Impact factor: 9.031
The structures of tested chemicals.
| Structure | Chemical |
|---|---|
| Fluorinated iodine alkanes (FIAs) | |
| PFBI, 1-iodoperfluorobutane (a = 1) | |
| PFHxI, 1-iodoperfluorohexane (a = 3) | |
| PFOI, 1-iodoperfluorooctane (a = 5) | |
| PFDI, 1-iodoperfluorodecane (a = 7) | |
| PFDoI, 1-iodoperfluorododecane (a = 9) | |
| Fluorinated telomer iodides (FTIs) | |
| 4:2 FTI, 1 | |
| 6:2 FTI, 1 | |
| 8:2 FTI, 1 | |
| 10:2 FTI, 1 | |
| Fluorinated diiodine alkanes (FDIAs) | |
| PFBDI, Octafluoro-1,4-diiodobutane (c = 4) | |
| PFHxDI, Dodecafluoro-1,6-diiodohexane (c = 6) | |
| PFODI, Hexadecafluoro-1,8-diiodooctane (c = 8) | |
| PFOC, 1H-perfluorooctane (R = H) | |
| PFOB, 1-bromoperfluorooctane (R = Br) | |
| PFOA, perfluorooctanoic acid | |
| 1-Iodohexane | |
| a, b, and c indicate the number of CF2 units. | |
Figure 1Concentration–response proliferation effects of FIAs (A) and FDIAs (B) in the E-screen assay. The relative proliferation effects are expressed as mean ± SD of triplicate measurements in one representative experiment.
Maximum induction and effective concentrations of tested chemicals based on the E‑screen and MVLN assays.
| E-screen | MVLN assay | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compound | Maximum induction (%) | EC50 | Relative potency | Maximum induction (%) | EC50 | EC20 | Relative potency | |||||||
| E2 | 100 | 3.12 pM | 1 | 100 | 16.4 pM | 4.14 pM | 1 | |||||||
| PFBI | ND | — | — | ND | — | — | — | |||||||
| PFHxI | 99 | 0.63 μM | 4.9 × 10–6 | 47 | 26.7 μM | 14.1 μM | 0.29 × 10–6 | |||||||
| PFOI | 101 | 1.15 μM | 2.7 × 10–6 | 25 | 35.1 μM | 20.4 μM | 0.2 × 10–6 | |||||||
| PFDI | ND | — | — | ND | — | — | — | |||||||
| PFDoI | ND | — | — | ND | — | — | — | |||||||
| 4:2 FTI | ND | — | — | ND | — | — | — | |||||||
| 6:2 FTI | ND | — | — | ND | — | — | — | |||||||
| 8:2 FTI | ND | — | — | ND | — | — | — | |||||||
| 10:2 FTI | ND | — | — | ND | — | — | — | |||||||
| PFBDI | 97 | 1.45 μM | 2.2 × 10–6 | 21 | 29.6 μM | 13.8 μM | 0.3 × 10–6 | |||||||
| PFHxDI | 100 | 7.5 nM | 4.2 × 10–4 | 73 | 1.13 μM | 0.38 μM | 1.1 × 10–5 | |||||||
| PFODI | 105 | 43.3 nM | 7.2 × 10–5 | 38 | 2.87 μM | 1.07 μM | 3.8 × 10–6 | |||||||
| PFOA | ND | — | — | ND | — | — | — | |||||||
| PFOC | ND | — | — | ND | — | — | — | |||||||
| PFOB | ND | — | — | ND | — | — | — | |||||||
| 1-Iodohexane | ND | — | — | ND | — | — | — | |||||||
| ND, not detected. | ||||||||||||||
Figure 2Concentration–response luciferase activity of FIAs (A) and FDIAs (B) in the MVLN assay. The relative luciferase activities are expressed as mean ± SD of triplicate measurements in one representative experiment.
Figure 3Coexposure effects of the tested chemicals with OHT in the MVLN assay. The ERα antagonist OHT (10 nM) was coexposed with 1 nM E2, 100 μM PFHxI, 100 μM PFOI, 100 μM PFBDI, 20 μM PFHxDI, or 40 μM PFODI. The relative luciferase activities are expressed as the mean ± SD of triplicate measurements in one representative experiment.
Figure 4Effects of tested chemicals on mRNA expression of estrogen-responsive genes TFF1 (pS2) and EGR3 in MCF-7 cells. (A) Cells exposed to 0.1% ethanol (control), 50 μM PFBI, 50 μM PFHxI, 50 μM PFOI, 40 μM PFDI, 40 μM PFDoI, 50 μM PFBDI, 20 μM PFHxDI, 40 μM PFODI, or 100 pM E2 for 48 hr. (B) Cells exposed to 0.1% ethanol, 50 μM PFOA, 50 μM PFOC, 50 μM PFOB, 50 μM 1-iodohexane, 50 μM 4:2 FTI, 50 μM 6:2 FTI, 40 μM 8:2 FTI, 40 μM 10:2 FTI, or 100 pM E2 for 48 hr. Results are expressed as the mean ± SD of triplicate measurements in one representative experiment. *p < 0.05, and **p < 0.01, compared with the control. ANOVA and Tukey’s multiple range test were used to assess the significance of mean differences.