| Literature DB >> 21988930 |
Chung Won Lee1, Min Jong Song, Sung Taek Park, Eun Young Ki, Sung Jong Lee, Keun Ho Lee, Ki Sung Ryu, Jong Sup Park, Soo Young Hur.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Malignant ovarian germ cell tumors are rare, and knowledge of their prognostic factors is limited, with little available randomized data. This study was conducted to evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics of malignant ovarian germ cell tumors and to determine the association of their prognostic factors to primary treatment failure.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21988930 PMCID: PMC3214187 DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-9-123
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Surg Oncol ISSN: 1477-7819 Impact factor: 2.754
The clinicopathologic factors associated with recurrence/progression in MOGCTs
| Variables | No. Patients (%) | Recurrence No | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | |||
| < 20 | 26(45.6) | 2(3.5) | 0.1177 |
| 20-40 | 28(49.1) | 3(5.3) | |
| > 40 | 3(5.3) | 1(1.8) | |
| Histological diagnosis | |||
| Dysgerminoma | 20(35.1) | 0(0.0) | < 0.0001 |
| Immature teratoma | 24(42.1) | 1(1.8) | |
| Endodermal sinus tumor | 8(14.0) | 2(3.5) | |
| Choriocarcinoma | 4(7.0) | 2(3.5) | |
| Mixed germ cell tumor | 1(1.8) | 1(1.8) | |
| Histological diagnosisa | |||
| Dysgerminoma | 20(35.1) | 0(0.00) | 0.0716 |
| Non-dysgerminoma | 37(64.9) | 6(10.5) | |
| Stage | |||
| I | 38(66.7) | 1(1.8) | 0.0052b |
| II | 3(5.2) | 0(0.0) | |
| III | 15(26.3) | 4(7.0) | |
| IV | 1(1.8) | 1(1.8) | |
| Volume of ascites, cc | |||
| < 100 | 33(57.9) | 2(3.5) | 0.1277 |
| ≥ 100 | 24(42.1) | 4(7.0) | |
| Elevated AFP, ng/ml (n = 46) | |||
| < 100 | 36(78.3) | 4(8.7) | 0.4089 |
| ≥ 100 | 10(21.7) | 2(4.4) | |
| Beta-hCG (n = 53) | |||
| Normal | 45(84.9) | 3(5.7) | 0.0134 |
| Elevated | 8(15.1) | 3(5.7) |
AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; hCG, human gonadotrophic hormone.
a Comparison between two groups.
b Comparison between stage I-II and stage III-IV.
Analyses of treatment-related variables associated with recurrence/progression in MOGCTs
| Variables | No. Patients (%) | Recurrence No | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment modalities | |||
| Surgery only | 8(14.0) | 1(1.8) | 0.4342 |
| Surgery + chemotherapy | 49(86.0) | 5(8.8) | |
| Operation methods | |||
| Fertility sparing | 42(73.7) | 1(1.8) | 0.0006 |
| Cystectomy without staging op. | 1(1.8) | 0(0.0) | |
| USO without staging op. | 20(35.1) | 0(0.0) | |
| USO with staging op. | 21(36.8) | 1(1.8) | |
| Non-fertility sparing | 15(26.3) | 5(8.8) | |
| Hysterectomy + BSO without staging op. | 5(8.8) | 0(0.0) | |
| Hysterectomy + BSO with staging op. | 10(17.5) | 5(8.8) | |
| Chemotherapy regimens (n = 49) | |||
| BEP | 9(18.4) | 1(2.0) | 0.9008 |
| EP | 28(57.1) | 3(6.1) | |
| VBP | 2(4.1) | 0(0.0) | |
| Others | 10(20.4) | 10(20.4) | |
| Residual lesions | |||
| None | 47(82.5) | 1(1.8) | < 0.0001 |
| ≤ 1 cm | 8(14.0) | 3(5.3) | |
| > 1 cm | 2(3.5) | 2(3.5) |
USO, unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; BSO, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; BEP, bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin; EP, etoposide and cisplatin; VBP, vinblastine, bleomycin, and cisplatin.
Summary of clinicopathologic features, treatment, and outcome of those who failed primary treatment
| Pt's | Age | Histology/Stage | Primary treatment | Outcome of primary treatment | Time to | Site of | Salvage treatment | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | Choriocarcinoma/ | TAH + BSO | CR | 4 | Brain | EMA-CO | DOD |
| 2 | 25 | Immature teratoma/ | USO | CR | 11 | PAN | BEP chemo | NED |
| 3 | 22 | Mixed germ cell | TAH + BSO | CR | 12 | Mesentery | EP chemo | NED |
| 4 | 19 | EST/Stage IIIa | TAH + BSO | CR | 7 | Mesentery | EP chemo. | NED |
| 5 | 29 | EST/Stage IIIc | TAH + BSO | CR | 6 | Pelvic lymph | VBP chemo. | NED |
| 6 | 65 | Mixed germ cell | TAH + BSO | Progressi-on | Liver | Cisplatin + Paclitaxel | DOD |
TAH, total abdominal hysterectomy; BSO, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; USO, unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; EMA-CO, etoposide, methotraxate, actinomycin-D, vincristine, and cyclophosphamide; BEP, bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin; EP, etoposide and cisplatin; CP, cisplatin and cyclophophamide; VBP, vinblastine, bleomycin, and cisplatin; CR, complete remission; PAN, paraaortic lymph node; DOD, died of disease; NED, no evidence of disease.
Figure 1The recurrence/progression free survival based on the residual tumor after the salvage surgery. Figure 1 presents the Kaplan-Meier estimate of the recurrence/progression free survival based on the residual tumor after the salvage surgery (no residual mass vs. ≤ 1 cm of residual mass vs. > 1 cm of residual mass). The one-year recurrence/progression-free survival rate of the patients with no residual tumor after their salvage surgery was 97.8%, and only 62.5% for the patients with ≤ 1 cm of residual mass, and 0% for the patients with > 1 cm of residual mass.