| Literature DB >> 35814432 |
Dan Wang1, Wei Cang1, Shan Zhu1, Congwei Jia2, Dongyan Cao1, Jiaxin Yang1, Yang Xiang1.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the oncological and reproductive outcomes in patients with advanced-stage ovarian immature teratoma (IMT).Entities:
Keywords: advanced stage; fertility preservation; immature teratoma; oncological outcome; reproductive outcome
Year: 2022 PMID: 35814432 PMCID: PMC9257032 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.822341
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 5.738
Figure 1Flow chart summarizing management and outcomes in patients with advanced-stage IMT. AWD alive with disease, DOD died of disease, NED no evidence disease.
Clinical-pathological characteristics in patients with advanced-stage IMT.
| Characteristics | |
|---|---|
| Age (median, years) | 22 (6-39) |
| Nulliparous | 35 |
| Tumor size (median, cm) | 20 (7-40) |
| FIGO stage | |
| II | 16 |
| III | 30 |
| Histological subtypes | |
| Pure immature teratoma | 37 |
| Immature teratoma with microscopic foci of yolk sac tumor | 9 |
| Tumor grade | |
| Grade 1 | 11 |
| Grade 2-3 | 35 |
| Gliomatosis Peritonei | 14 |
| Chemotherapy (types and number of cycles) | 44 |
| BEP regimen | 29 |
| 2 cycles | 2 |
| 3 cycles | 3 |
| 4 cycles | 15 |
| Others | 8 |
| BEP followed by EP regimen (5 cycles) | 1 |
| BVP regimen | 10 |
| 1 cycle | 1 |
| 3 cycles | 2 |
| 4 cycles | 1 |
| 6 cycles | 4 |
| Others | 2 |
| Other regimens | 5 |
| Oncological outcomes | |
| IMTs | 15 |
| GTS | 20 |
| Death | 4 |
FIGO, the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology; GTS, growing teratoma syndrome; IMT, immature teratoma; BEP, bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin; BVP, bleomycin, vincristine, cisplatin; EP, etoposide, cisplatin.
Characteristics of patients at the management of advanced-stage IMT.
| Characteristics | N = 46 |
|---|---|
| Surgical procedure | |
| Fertility-sparing surgery | 38 |
| Radical surgery | 8 |
| Surgical procedures for debulking surgery | |
| Ovarian procedures | 46 |
| Ovarian cystectomy | 4 |
| Unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy | 34 |
| Hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy | 8 |
| Lymphadenectomy (pelvic and/or para-aortic) | 16 |
| Complete omentectomy | 37 |
| Large peritonectomies | 38 |
| Appendectomy | 10 |
| Small bowel resection | 1 |
| Surgical outcomes | |
| No macroscopic residual tumor | 15 |
| Residual disease ≤1cm | 5 |
| Residual disease >1 cm | 26 |
IMT, immature teratoma.
Risk factors for recurrence in patients with advanced-stage IMT.
| Factors | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-year DFS (%) | HR (95% CI) |
| HR (95% CI) |
| |
| Parity | 0.681 | ||||
| Nulliparous | 67.8 | 1 | |||
| Parous | 72.7 | 0.767 (0.215-2.736) | |||
| Initial treatment | 0.031 | 0.519 | |||
| Our clinic | 92.9 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Outside facility | 56.5 | 4.479 (1.009-19.887) | 1.675 (0.350-8.021) | ||
| FIGO stage | 0.346 | ||||
| II | 75.0 | 1 | |||
| III | 65.9 | 1.723 (0.548-5.420) | |||
| Tumor rupture | 0.747 | ||||
| No | 68.9 | 1 | |||
| Yes | 69.2 | 1.185 (0.421-3.336) | |||
| Surgical procedures | 0.741 | ||||
| Radical surgery | 62.5 | 1 | |||
| FSS | 70.3 | 0.808 (0.228-2.866) | |||
| Surgical outcomes | 0.001 | 0.023 | |||
| Optimal CRS | 100 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Suboptimal CRS | 45.6 | 14.836 (1.946-113.092) | 11.831 (1.409-99.338) | ||
| Lymphadenectomy | 0.118 | ||||
| Yes | 87.5 | 1 | |||
| No | 59.0 | 2.654 (0.742-9.492) | |||
| Histology | 0.914 | ||||
| Pure IMTs | 69.9 | 1 | |||
| IMTs with microscopic foci of YST | 66.7 | 0.933 (0.263-3.311) | |||
| Tumor grade | 0.792 | ||||
| G1 | 62.3 | 1 | |||
| G2-G3 | 71.1 | 0.857 (0.273-2.695) | |||
| GP at initial surgery | 0.111 | ||||
| No | 62.2 | 1 | |||
| Yes | 84.4 | 0.317 (0.071-1.411) | |||
CI, confidential interval; CRS, cytoreductive surgery; DFS, disease-free survival; FIGO, the International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology; FSS, Fertility-sparing surgery; GP, gliomatosis peritonei; GTS, growing teratoma syndrome; HR: hazard ratio; IMT, immature teratoma; YST, yolk sac tumor.
Figure 2Survival curves for disease-free survival (A) and overall survival (B) according to surgical outcome.