Literature DB >> 21988891

A shared cortical bottleneck underlying Attentional Blink and Psychological Refractory Period.

Sébastien Marti1, Mariano Sigman, Stanislas Dehaene.   

Abstract

Doing two things at once is difficult. When two tasks have to be performed within a short interval, the second is sharply delayed, an effect called the Psychological Refractory Period (PRP). Similarly, when two successive visual targets are briefly flashed, people may fail to detect the second target (Attentional Blink or AB). Although AB and PRP are typically studied in very different paradigms, a recent detailed neuromimetic model suggests that both might arise from the same serial stage during which stimuli gain access to consciousness and, as a result, can be arbitrarily routed to any other appropriate processor. Here, in agreement with this model, we demonstrate that AB and PRP can be obtained on alternate trials of the same cross-modal paradigm and result from limitations in the same brain mechanisms. We asked participants to respond as fast as possible to an auditory target T1 and then to a visual target T2 embedded in a series of distractors, while brain activity was recorded with magneto-encephalography (MEG). For identical stimuli, we observed a mixture of blinked trials, where T2 was entirely missed, and PRP trials, where T2 processing was delayed. MEG recordings showed that PRP and blinked trials underwent identical sensory processing in visual occipito-temporal cortices, even including the non-conscious separation of targets from distractors. However, late activations in frontal cortex (>350 ms), strongly influenced by the speed of task-1 execution, were delayed in PRP trials and absent in blinked trials. Our findings suggest that PRP and AB arise from similar cortical stages, can occur with the same exact stimuli, and are merely distinguished by trial-by-trial fluctuations in task processing.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21988891     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  31 in total

1.  The attentional blink: why does Lag-1 sparing occur when the dependent measure is accuracy, but Lag-1 deficit when it is RT?

Authors:  Hayley E P Lagroix; Vincent Di Lollo; Thomas M Spalek
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-05-26

2.  Global-local processing and dispositional bias interact with emotion processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm.

Authors:  Skaiste G Kerusauskaite; Luca Simione; Antonino Raffone; Narayanan Srinivasan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  The task novelty paradox: Flexible control of inflexible neural pathways during rapid instructed task learning.

Authors:  Michael W Cole; Todd S Braver; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Explicit goal-driven attention, unlike implicitly learned attention, spreads to secondary tasks.

Authors:  Douglas A Addleman; Jinyi Tao; Roger W Remington; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  Central attention is serial, but midlevel and peripheral attention are parallel-A hypothesis.

Authors:  Benjamin J Tamber-Rosenau; René Marois
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Dissociation between process-based and data-based limitations for conscious perception in the human brain.

Authors:  Suk Won Han; René Marois
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Cholinergic excitation in mouse primary vs. associative cortex: region-specific magnitude and receptor balance.

Authors:  Michael K Tian; Craig D C Bailey; Evelyn K Lambe
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Pre-target oscillatory brain activity and the attentional blink.

Authors:  Nathan M Petro; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 9.  Conscious Processing and the Global Neuronal Workspace Hypothesis.

Authors:  George A Mashour; Pieter Roelfsema; Jean-Pierre Changeux; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Time-Resolved Decoding of Two Processing Chains during Dual-Task Interference.

Authors:  Sébastien Marti; Jean-Rémi King; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.