Literature DB >> 21987525

The poor responder in IVF: is the prognosis always poor?: a systematic review.

J F Oudendijk1, F Yarde, M J C Eijkemans, F J M Broekmans, S L Broer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND In IVF treatment a considerable proportion of women are faced with a low number of oocytes retrieved. These poor responders have reduced pregnancy rates compared with normal responders. However, this may not be applicable to all poor responders. This review aims at identifying patient characteristics and ovarian reserve tests (ORT) that will determine prognosis for pregnancy in poor responders. METHODS A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and SCOPUS databases in April 2010. Studies regarding patient characteristics or ORT in poor responders and their pregnancy prospects were included. All included papers were summarized in descriptive tables. RESULTS Nineteen studies were included. Pooled data of six studies comparing poor and normal responders demonstrated clearly lower pregnancy rates in poor responders (14.8 versus 34.5%). Ten studies indicated that older poor responders have a lower range of pregnancy rates compared with younger (1.5-12.7 versus 13.0-35%, respectively). Four studies showed that pregnancy prospects become reduced when fewer oocytes are retrieved (0-7% with 1 oocyte versus 11.5-18.6% with 4 oocytes). Five studies concerning pregnancy rates in subsequent cycles suggested a more favourable outcome in unexpected poor responders, and if ≥2 oocytes were retrieved. CONCLUSIONS Poor responders are not a homogeneous group of women with regards to pregnancy prospects. Female age and number of oocytes retrieved in particular will modulate the chances for pregnancy in current and subsequent cycles. Applying these criteria will allow the identification of couples with a reasonable prognosis and balanced decision-making on the management of poor responders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21987525     DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmr037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod Update        ISSN: 1355-4786            Impact factor:   15.610


  49 in total

1.  A novel "delayed start" protocol with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist improves outcomes in poor responders.

Authors:  Hakan Cakmak; Nam D Tran; A Musa Zamah; Marcelle I Cedars; Mitchell P Rosen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Live birth rates in the different combinations of the Bologna criteria poor ovarian responders: a validation study.

Authors:  Antonio La Marca; Valentina Grisendi; Simone Giulini; Giovanna Sighinolfi; Alessandra Tirelli; Cindy Argento; Claudia Re; Daniela Tagliasacchi; Tiziana Marsella; Sesh Kamal Sunkara
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Efficacy of the delayed start antagonist protocol for controlled ovarian stimulation in Bologna poor ovarian responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shuang Yang; Nenghui Liu; Yanping Li; Lei Zhang; Rongya Yue
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.344

4.  Tiaogeng Yijing decoction improves the pregnancy outcomes of patients with poor ovarian response undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.

Authors:  Hui Xue; Juan Dong; Huijun Xu; Xin Huang; Huangguan Dai; Cuifang Hao
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Mild Versus Conventional Ovarian Stimulation for Poor Responders Undergoing IVF/ICSI.

Authors:  Charalampos Siristatidis; George Salamalekis; Konstantinos Dafopoulos; George Basios; Paraskevi Vogiatzi; Nikolaos Papantoniou
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 6.  Comparison of different stimulation protocols used in in vitro fertilization: a review.

Authors:  Deekshya Shrestha; Xiaolin La; Huai L Feng
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-06

7.  The significance of antral follicle size prior to stimulation in predicting ovarian response in a multiple dose GnRH antagonist protocol.

Authors:  Qiaohong Lai; Cai Chen; Zhijun Zhang; Shu Zhang; Qilin Yu; Ping Yang; Jun Hu; Cong-Yi Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2013-01-15

8.  "Mild" vs. "long" protocol for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in patients with expected poor ovarian responsiveness undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF): a large prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Alberto Revelli; Alessandra Chiadò; Paola Dalmasso; Veronica Stabile; Francesca Evangelista; Gemma Basso; Chiara Benedetto
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Association between GnRH Receptor Polymorphisms and Luteinizing Hormone Levels for Low Ovarian Reserve Infertile Women.

Authors:  Shun-Long Weng; Shu-Ling Tzeng; Chun-I Lee; Chung-Hsien Liu; Chun-Chia Huang; Shun-Fa Yang; Maw-Sheng Lee; Tsung-Hsien Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  The Role of Traditional Chinese Formula Ding-Kun Pill (DKP) in Expected Poor Ovarian Response Women (POSEIDON Group 4) Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Jing-Yan Song; Dan-Dan Gao; Xian-Ling Cao; Shan Xiang; Yan-Hua Chen; Yi-Li Teng; Xiu-Fang Li; Hai-Ping Liu; Fu-Xin Wang; Bin Zhang; Li-Hua Xu; Li Zhou; Xiang-Hong Huang; Zhen-Gao Sun
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.