Literature DB >> 21987364

How much of the PCL is really preserved during the tibial cut?

Georg Matziolis1, Saskia Mehlhorn, Nicole Schattat, Gerd Diederichs, Robert Hube, Carsten Perka, Doerte Matziolis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There are two different techniques for retaining the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in total knee arthroplasty. The attachment of the PCL can be spared during resection of the tibial plateau, so that a small posterior bone block remains. In contrast to this, many surgeons resect the tibial plateau completely and detach a part of the tibial PCL attachment from the resected material. The objective of this study was to determine how big this part is in an anatomical resection of the tibial plateau with 0° and 7° slope and whether it is gender-dependent.
METHODS: Two hundred consecutive patients who had undergone MRI of a knee joint were included. Patients were excluded if they were younger than 18 years or had dysplasia of the knee joint or injuries of the posterior cruciate ligament. The MRIs of 182 knees that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were analysed. For each knee, an anatomical tibial resection with 0° and 7° posterior slope was simulated, and the parts of the tibial PCL attachment that were resected and retained were determined.
RESULTS: Given a measured tibial resection with 0° slope, 45 ± 28% of the tibial PCL attachment was removed in the men, compared with 46 ± 30% in the women (n.s.). Given a resection with 7° slope, 69 ± 24% of the tibial PCL attachment was removed in the men and 67 ± 25% in the women. This corresponded to a complete resection in 19 men (20%) and 16 women (24%).
CONCLUSIONS: Independently of gender, the anatomical resection of the tibia leads to the removal of a considerable part of the tibial PCL attachment, if this is not spared in the form of a bone block during resection. This becomes increasingly relevant with higher posterior slope of the resection plane. In the case of a cruciate-retaining surgical technique, the retention of the posterior tibial cortical bone in the area of attachment of the PCL is therefore strongly recommended. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21987364     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1696-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  15 in total

1.  Multicenter determination of in vivo kinematics after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Douglas A Dennis; Richard D Komistek; Mohamed R Mahfouz; Brian D Haas; James B Stiehl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Mechanoreceptors found in a posterior cruciate ligament from a well-functioning total knee arthroplasty retrieval.

Authors:  William M Mihalko; Aaron T Creek; Michelle N Mary; John L Williams; David E Komatsu
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 3.  The movement of the normal tibio-femoral joint.

Authors:  M A R Freeman; V Pinskerova
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Evaluation of in situ graft forces of a 2-bundle tibial inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at various flexion angles.

Authors:  Eric W Carson; Xiang Hua Deng; Answorth Allen; Thomas Wickiewicz; Russell F Warren
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  The attachments of the fiber bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study.

Authors:  Andrew Edwards; Anthony M J Bull; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Kinematics of medial osteoarthritic knees before and after posterior cruciate ligament retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bing Yue; Kartik M Varadarajan; Angela L Moynihan; Fang Liu; Harry E Rubash; Guoan Li
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Knee range of motion during the first two years after use of posterior cruciate-stabilizing or posterior cruciate-retaining total knee prostheses. A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  R Chaudhary; L A Beaupré; D W C Johnston
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 8.  Seven cuts to the perfect total knee.

Authors:  Peter Brooks
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.390

9.  In vivo flexion and kinematics of the knee after TKA: comparison of a conventional and a high flexion cruciate-retaining TKA design.

Authors:  Jeremy F Suggs; Young-Min Kwon; Sridhar M Durbhakula; George R Hanson; Guoan Li
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament versus the posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Lennard G H van den Boom; Reinoud W Brouwer; Inge van den Akker-Scheek; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Jos J A M van Raaij
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  22 in total

1.  Partial resection of the PCL insertion site during tibial preparation in cruciate-retaining TKA.

Authors:  Hans Feyen; Nick Van Opstal; Johan Bellemans
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Fibula head is a useful landmark to predict the location of posterior cruciate ligament footprint prior to total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ahmed Jawhar; Sandeep Wasnik; Hanns-Peter Scharf; Henning Roehl
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  [Importance of the tibial slope in knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Silvan Wittenberg; Ufuk Sentuerk; Lisa Renner; Claude Weynandt; Carsten F Perka; Clemens Gwinner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  The influence of the tibial slope on intra-operative soft tissue balance in cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Shinya Oka; Tomoyuki Matsumoto; Hirotsugu Muratsu; Seiji Kubo; Takehiko Matsushita; Kazunari Ishida; Ryosuke Kuroda; Masahiro Kurosaka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The superficial medial collateral ligament is the primary medial restraint to knee laxity after cruciate-retaining or posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty: effects of implant type and partial release.

Authors:  Kiron K Athwal; Hadi El Daou; Christoph Kittl; Andrew J Davies; David J Deehan; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Mean tensile strength of the PCL in TKA depends on the preservation of the tibial insertion site.

Authors:  N Van Opstal; H Feyen; J P Luyckx; J Bellemans
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Different intraoperative kinematics, stability, and range of motion between cruciate-substituting ultracongruent and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hagen Fritzsche; Franziska Beyer; Anne Postler; Jörg Lützner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  No difference in range of motion between ultracongruent and posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jörg Lützner; Franziska Beyer; Julian Dexel; Hagen Fritzsche; Cornelia Lützner; Stephan Kirschner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Preservation of the PCL when performing cruciate-retaining TKA: Is the tibial tuberosity a reliable predictor of the PCL footprint location?

Authors:  A Jawhar; A S Kadavkolan; S Wasnik; H P Scharf; H Roehl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-09-14       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: How much of the PCL is really retained?

Authors:  Trifon Totlis; Michael Iosifidis; Ioannes Melas; Konstantinos Apostolidis; Alexios Agapidis; Nikolaos Eftychiakos; Dimitrios Alvanos; Anastasios Kyriakidis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.