Literature DB >> 21987030

Health-related quality of life changes associated with buprenorphine treatment for opioid dependence.

Dennis W Raisch1, Heather M Campbell, David A Garnand, Mark A Jones, Mike R Sather, Rupali Naik, Walter Ling.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Few studies have described improvement in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) associated with opioid dependence treatment with buprenorphine (ODT-B).
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate HRQOL changes in domain scores, physical and mental component summaries, and health utilities (HUs) associated with ODT-B using the Short Form 36 (SF-36).
METHODS: We assessed HRQOL changes in a substudy of a pharmacokinetic study that compared buprenorphine oral tablet and liquid dosage formulations over 16 weeks. Individuals, aged 18-65 years, were screened for opioid dependence. They were excluded if they would not agree to birth control or had a serious medical condition. Subjects received psychosocial counseling and weekly group therapy. The SF-36 was administered upon enrollment and at 4-week intervals. We used the SF-6D to estimate HUs. We performed intention to treat (ITT) analyses based on the last observation available for each subject. Paired t tests of each domain and HU, limited to remaining patients at each 4-week interval, were also conducted.
RESULTS: Of 96 subjects enrolled, cumulative dropouts over time resulted in 80, 69, 59, and 44 subjects remaining at 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks. There were no significant differences in opioid-positive urines, dropout rates, or dosage changes between formulations. In the ITT analyses, HRQOL improvements over time were bodily pain (62.1 vs. 69.1, P = 0.017), vitality (49.8 vs. 56.5, P = 0.001), mental health (59.9 vs. 66.0, P = 0.001), social function (66.4 vs. 74.7, P = 0.001), role emotional (59.4 vs. 71.9, P = 0.003), role physical (60.9 vs. 70.6, P = 0.005), and mental component summary (41.9 vs. 45.4, P<0.001). HU scores also improved (0.674 vs. 0.715, P = 0.001). Results from paired t tests, with only concurrently enrolled patients, showed similar improvements from baseline to 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks.
CONCLUSION: Buprenorphine, accompanied with psychosocial counseling, was associated with improved HRQOL and HUs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21987030      PMCID: PMC4153754          DOI: 10.1007/s11136-011-0027-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  53 in total

Review 1.  Valuing health-related quality of life. A review of health state valuation techniques.

Authors:  C Green; J Brazier; M Deverill
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Understanding quality-adjusted life years and their application to pharmacoeconomic research.

Authors:  D W Raisch
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.154

3.  Reliability, validity, and minimally important differences of the SF-6D in systemic sclerosis.

Authors:  Dinesh Khanna; Daniel E Furst; Weng Kee Wong; Joel Tsevat; Philip J Clements; Grace S Park; Arnold E Postlethwaite; Mansoor Ahmed; Shaari Ginsburg; Ron D Hays
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  US and UK versions of the EQ-5D preference weights: does choice of preference weights make a difference?

Authors:  I-Chan Huang; Richard J Willke; Mark J Atkinson; William R Lenderking; Constantine Frangakis; Albert W Wu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  The comparative responsiveness of the EQ-5D and SF-6D to change in patients with inflammatory arthritis.

Authors:  M J Harrison; L M Davies; N J Bansback; M J McCoy; S M M Verstappen; K Watson; D P M Symmons
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Buprenorphine 101: treating opioid dependence with buprenorphine in an office-based setting.

Authors:  Matthew Torrington; Catherine P Domier; Maureen Hillhouse; Walter Ling
Journal:  J Addict Dis       Date:  2007

7.  A randomized trial of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of observed versus unobserved administration of buprenorphine-naloxone for heroin dependence.

Authors:  James Bell; Marian Shanahan; Carolyn Mutch; Felicity Rea; Anni Ryan; Robert Batey; Adrian Dunlop; Adam Winstock
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2007-09-03       Impact factor: 6.526

8.  Validity, responsiveness, and minimal important difference for the SF-6D health utility scale in a spinal cord injured population.

Authors:  Bonsan Bonne Lee; Madeleine T King; Judy M Simpson; Mark J Haran; Martin R Stockler; Obaydullah Marial; Glenn Salkeld
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 5.725

9.  Racial and ethnic changes in heroin injection in the United States: implications for the HIV/AIDS epidemic.

Authors:  Dita Broz; Lawrence J Ouellet
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.492

10.  What is the relationship between the minimally important difference and health state utility values? The case of the SF-6D.

Authors:  Stephen J Walters; John E Brazier
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-04-11       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  11 in total

1.  National Survey of US HIV Clinicians: Knowledge and Attitudes About the Affordable Care Act and Opinions of its Impact on Quality of Care and Barriers to Care.

Authors:  Kathleen A McManus; Joshua Ferey; Elizabeth Farrell; Rebecca Dillingham
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.835

2.  Predictors of early dropout in outpatient buprenorphine/naloxone treatment.

Authors:  David E Marcovitz; R Kathryn McHugh; Julie Volpe; Victoria Votaw; Hilary S Connery
Journal:  Am J Addict       Date:  2016-07-21

3.  Changes in Quality of Life following Buprenorphine Treatment: Relationship with Treatment Retention and Illicit Opioid Use.

Authors:  Shannon Gwin Mitchell; Jan Gryczynski; Robert P Schwartz; C Patrick Myers; Kevin E O'Grady; Yngvild K Olsen; Jerome H Jaffe
Journal:  J Psychoactive Drugs       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

4.  Budgetary impact analysis of buprenorphine-naloxone combination (Suboxone®) in Spain.

Authors:  Jose Martinez-Raga; Francisco Gonzalez-Saiz; Julian Oñate; Itziar Oyagüez; Eliazar Sabater; Miguel A Casado
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2012-03-29

5.  Quality of life improved following in-patient substance use disorder treatment.

Authors:  Adrian R Pasareanu; Anne Opsal; John-Kåre Vederhus; Øistein Kristensen; Thomas Clausen
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Management of opioid addiction with buprenorphine: French history and current management.

Authors:  Pierre Poloméni; Raymund Schwan
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2014-03-03

7.  Comparison and concordance of health-related quality of life tests among substance users.

Authors:  Antonio J Rojas; Oscar Lozano; Katia Foresti; Elham Zolfaghari; Carlos Zubaran
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.186

8.  Health Related Quality of Life in Individuals Transferred from a Needle Exchange Program and Starting Opioid Agonist Treatment.

Authors:  Martin Bråbäck; Louise Brådvik; Katja Troberg; Pernilla Isendahl; Suzan Nilsson; Anders Håkansson
Journal:  J Addict       Date:  2018-12-19

9.  Safety and tolerability of sauna detoxification for the protracted withdrawal symptoms of substance abuse.

Authors:  Richard D Lennox; Marie Cecchini-Sternquist
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 1.671

10.  Factors associated with health-related quality of life in a large national sample of patients receiving opioid substitution treatment in Germany: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Lisa Strada; Christiane Sybille Schmidt; Moritz Rosenkranz; Uwe Verthein; Norbert Scherbaum; Jens Reimer; Bernd Schulte
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2019-01-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.