OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to perform histological and histometric analyses of the repair process of autogenous bone grafts fixed at rat calvaria with ethyl-cyanoacrylate adhesive. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-two rats were divided into two groups (n=16), Group I - Control and Group II - Adhesive. Osteotomies were made at the right parietal bone for graft obtainment using a 4-mm-diameter trephine drill. Then, the bone segments were fixed with the adhesive in the parietal region of the opposite side to the donor site. After 10 and 30 days, 8 animals of each group were euthanized and the calvarias were laboratorially processed for obtaining hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides for histological and histometric analyses. RESULTS: An intense inflammatory reaction was observed at the 10-day period. At 30 days, this reaction was less intense, despite the presence of adhesive at the recipient-site/graft interface. Graft incorporation to the recipient site was observed only at the control group, which maintained the highest graft size at 10 and 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: Although the fragment was stable, the presence of adhesive in Group II did not allow graft incorporation to the recipient site, determining a localized, discrete and persistent inflammatory reaction.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to perform histological and histometric analyses of the repair process of autogenous bone grafts fixed at rat calvaria with ethyl-cyanoacrylate adhesive. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-two rats were divided into two groups (n=16), Group I - Control and Group II - Adhesive. Osteotomies were made at the right parietal bone for graft obtainment using a 4-mm-diameter trephinedrill. Then, the bone segments were fixed with the adhesive in the parietal region of the opposite side to the donor site. After 10 and 30 days, 8 animals of each group were euthanized and the calvarias were laboratorially processed for obtaining hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides for histological and histometric analyses. RESULTS: An intense inflammatory reaction was observed at the 10-day period. At 30 days, this reaction was less intense, despite the presence of adhesive at the recipient-site/graft interface. Graft incorporation to the recipient site was observed only at the control group, which maintained the highest graft size at 10 and 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: Although the fragment was stable, the presence of adhesive in Group II did not allow graft incorporation to the recipient site, determining a localized, discrete and persistent inflammatory reaction.
Autogenous grafting is the most commonly used surgical procedure for bone reconstruction
due to its advantages in comparison with other graft materials, such as biocompatibility
and bone regeneration potential[4].
Several possibilities are reported by the literature for atrophic jaws reconstruction,
and among these solutions it is possible to cite intra and extra-oral autogenous grafts,
allografts, alloplastic and xenogenic grafts, with or without the use of membranes for
guided bone regeneration[19,20].Autogenous bone grafts are considered the most suitable for the reconstruction of
defects at oral and maxillofacial regions, mainly due to their characteristics of
osteoinduction and osteoconduction. It is the only type of graft that provides live
immunocompatible bone cells, essential to the stage I of osteogenesis. This makes this
type of graft more advantageous, since the higher the amount of transplanted living
cells, the higher the possibility of new bone formation[4,5,20].Graft fixation is a fundamental procedure for the normal process of bone
regeneration[17]. In the last
decade, plates and screws, represented by metallic and biodegradable materials, have
been used preferably for obtaining graft stability as well as for fixation of fractures
of the whole craniofacial bone. This is due to the fact that these materials provide a
rigid fixation with tridimensional control of the bone position[1,27]. On the other hand, disadvantages such as inflammatory reactions, bone
displacement and technical difficulty have guided medical and dental researchers to the
search for an alternative method for graft fixation, and, in this field, tissue
adhesives are a resource potentially capable of providing stability for the healing
process[12].Tissue adhesives based on cyanoacrylate (CA) are substances that have been successfully
employed for skin laceration synthesis and surgical incisions[6,10,13,22,25], as well as for the stabilization of
thin bone fragments in orbital fractures[13] and osteochondral fractures[26]. The most interesting properties of the adhesives are their rapid
polymerization, strong adhesion to the surfaces where they are applied,
biocompatibility[2,8,12], bacteriostatic[15,22] and hemostatic actions[18], besides being a quick and atraumatic
fixation method[3,10,21].Ethyl-CA, which is a short chain CA, was one of the first adhesives to be tested for
medical use, presenting excellent adhesive strength[11]. However, its apparent toxicity to soft tissues conducted the
researches for adhesives of longer chain, such as butyl and octyl-CA, which present
higher biocompatibility[9].In spite of these findings, the adhesive capacity of ethyl-CA has still been tested for
biological use in bone tissue fixation, with satisfactory results[3,14,16,24]. Generally, few studies have investigated the CA behavior on
mineralized tissues fixation. The purpose of this study was to perform histological and
histometric analyses of the repair process of autogenous bone grafts fixed at rat
calvaria with ethyl-CA adhesive
MATERIAL AND METHODS
This study was approved by the institutional Research Ethics Committee (Protocol
#2008-005587). Thirty-two male adult rats were used (Rattus norvegicus
albinus, Wistar)) with mean weight of 250 g, divided into 2 experimental
groups of 16 animals each: Group I - Control and Group II - Adhesive. During the whole
experiment, the animals were kept in cages at the Vivarium of the Department of Surgery
and Integrated Clinics and fed solid animal chow (Guabi Nutrilabor®, Mogiana
Alimentos, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) and water ad libitum, except in the
fasting period (14-16 hours) that preceded the surgical procedure, in which they
received only water.After anesthesia with intramuscular xylazine hydrochloride (0.2 mL/250 g)
(Xilazin®, Syntec do Brasil Ltda, Cotia, SP, Brazil) and ketamine
hydrochloride (Cetamin®, Syntec do Brasil Ltda, Cotia, SP, Brazil) (0.1
mL/250 g), shaving and antisepsis were accomplished with 10% PVP-I in the frontoparietal
region. The animals received an approximately 20-mm-wide mid-longitudinal incision in
the scalp over the sagittal calvarial suture, followed by soft-tissue dissection,
exposing the parietal bones. In each animal, a rounded osteotomy was made in the right
parietal bone with a 4-mm-diameter trephine bur at low speed under constant saline
irrigation to obtain a rounded bone fragment, preserving the integrity of the dura mater
and brain. The defect was kept with the cavity covered by blood clot and was not
examined. In the left side, at the site that would receive the graft, the parietal bone
was decorticalized with a #8 spherical bur at low speed. In Group I, the graft was only
positioned at the recipient site, without any type of fixation material. In Group II,
the graft was fixed with ethyl-CA adhesive (Super Bonder®; Loctite-Henkel,
Itapevi, SP, Brazil) applied with a microbrush. The flap was repositioned and sutured
with continuous spiraled suture using Mononylon 5-0 (Mononylon®, J&J
Ethicon, São José dos Campos, SP, Brazil).The animals were euthanized by anesthetic overdose at 10 and 30 postoperative days (8
animals/period). The calvaria were removed and the left parietal bones were separated,
preserving the supraperiosteal soft tissues. The pieces were fixed in 10% formaldehyde
and subjected to routine laboratorial processing. Six-micrometer-thick cross sections
were obtained and stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histological and histometric
analyses.In the histological (qualitative) analysis, the graft/recipient site interface, the
presence of the following items was assessed: adhesive fragments, inflammatory
infiltrate, fibroblastic proliferation and new bone and capillary formation, in
superficial and deep tissues.In the histometric (quantitative) analysis, the slides were examined in an optical
microscope (Aristoplan-Leitz®, Leica, Wetzlar, Hesse, Germany) at 2.5x
magnification, through a camera (Axio Cam MRc5®, Zeiss, Santo Amaro, SP,
Brazil) connected to a computer. Using the AxioVision 4.5 software, the images were
converted into digital "TIF" files, standardizing the height, width and number of pixels
per inch. The bone graft size at 10 and 30 days was quantified in pixels, using the
Imagelab 2000 software (Diracon Bio Informática Ltda, Vargem Grande do Sul. SP, Brazil).
The evaluation was performed by a single trained examiner and the measurements were done
at three different moments, with an interval of 1 week between the evaluations. The mean
of these three values was assigned to each slide, and the value was used for statistical
analysis.Statistical analysis was accomplished with GMC 9 software (Statistical software created
by Prof. Geraldo Maia - FORP-USP). Initially, data were submitted to normal curve
adherence test, which showed a non-parametric behavior. Thus, Kruskal-Wallis test was
used to compare the data at 10 and 30 days. The Mann-Whitney test was used for
individual comparisons (p<0.05).
RESULTS
All animals tolerated well the experimental procedures in such a way that, at 10 days
after postoperatively, the soft tissues handled during the surgical procedures were
already healed, with an aspect of normality and without signs of infection or wound
dehiscence.
Histological results
10 days - Group I
Superficially, the periosteum presented hyperplasia with a discrete inflammatory
infiltrate. Underneath, the graft was observed, with most of its osteocyte lacunae
filled by osteocytes. At the interface between the graft and the recipient site,
it was possible to observe a thin layer of compact fibrous connective tissue and
areas of bone remodeling both at the graft and the parietal bone. At the
peripheral regions, it was observed areas with initial new bone formation (Figure 1).
Figure 1
Group I – 10 days: Peripheral region of the graft. New bone formation, with
primary bone tissue (asterisks), from the graft fragment (bone graft - BG)
and parietal bone (hematoxylin-eosin – Original 160x)
Group I – 10 days: Peripheral region of the graft. New bone formation, with
primary bone tissue (asterisks), from the graft fragment (bone graft - BG)
and parietal bone (hematoxylin-eosin – Original 160x)
10 days - Group II
Superficially, it was possible to observe a thin fibrous capsule covering the bone
graft. In most specimens, a predominance of lymphocytes together with a large
number of neutrophils was observed. Adjacent to the fibrous capsule it was
possible to notice the bone graft with its osteocyte lacunae containing basophilic
nucleus. Several bone lacunae were found into the grafts containing multinucleate
cells, and, in most of the specimens, a large number of neutrophils. Deeply and
adjacent to the graft, fragments of CA were observed filling the space between the
graft and the recipient site. Adjacent to the bone surface of the recipient site,
there were several resorption areas with a large number of osteoclastic-type
multinucleate cells. A large number of lymphocytes and neutrophils were observed
into the medullar spaces of the bone tissue. Few fibroblasts could be identified,
with a predominance of resorption areas concerning new bone formation areas.
Discrete areas of new bone formation could be seen in the recipient site. It was
still possible to observe the absence of a bone union between the bone graft and
the recipient site (Figure 2).
Figure 2
Group II – 10 days: Bone graft (BG) with osteocyte lacunae containing
basophilic nucleus. Fragments of cyanoacrylate (CA) are observed filling the
space between the bone graft and the recipient site and discrete areas of
new bone formation (BN) can be observed in the recipient site
(hematoxylin-eosin - Original 63x)
Group II – 10 days: Bone graft (BG) with osteocyte lacunae containing
basophilic nucleus. Fragments of cyanoacrylate (CA) are observed filling the
space between the bone graft and the recipient site and discrete areas of
new bone formation (BN) can be observed in the recipient site
(hematoxylin-eosin - Original 63x)
30 days - Group I
At 30 days, the periosteum layer over the graft showed no signs of hyperplasia,
and presented a discrete inflammatory infiltrate. Bone graft was attached to the
recipient site through newly formed bone tissue at the interface region. In
several specimens, this new bone formation occurs only at the central third of the
graft, and their margins remained joined to the donor area by a compact connective
tissue (Figure 3). The graft had an aspect
of mature bone, well vascularized and with osteocyte lacunae filled by osteocytes
in Havers systems.
Figure 3
Group I – 30 days: Bone graft (BG) incorporated to the recipient site. New
bone formation at the interface observed only at the graft central region,
where the extremities remained filled by fibrous connective tissue
(hematoxylin-eosin – Original 100x)
Group I – 30 days: Bone graft (BG) incorporated to the recipient site. New
bone formation at the interface observed only at the graft central region,
where the extremities remained filled by fibrous connective tissue
(hematoxylin-eosin – Original 100x)
30 days - Group II
In all specimens, a fibrous capsule covered the bone graft. Underneath the fibrous
capsule, graft presents some areas of bone resorption in its external surface,
with some osteoclastic-type multinucleate cells. These resorptions could also be
observed into the bone fragment. In the graft proximal areas, in some specimens, a
bone union with the recipient site was observed; however, in most of the animals,
this union could not be identified, because the region was filled with a
lymphocyte-type inflammatory infiltrate, some blood vessels and several collagen
fibers that maintained continuity with the capsule collagen fibers. Discrete areas
of new bone formation were observed in the internal surfaces of the grafts,
surfaces that were in contact with the CA. More deeply, between the graft and the
recipient site, a space filled with a great amount of CA was observed. In several
areas, multinucleate cells could be identified, mainly in the regions adjacent to
the graft proximal surface (Figure 4). Few
areas of newly formed bone were observed in this space until the time period
studied. Regarding the recipient site, resorption areas and new bone formation
areas could be identified in some of the specimens (Figure 5).
Figure 4
Group II – 30 days: Underneath, bone graft is linked to the recipient site
only in the graft margin. Areas of new bone formation (BN) are observed in
the internal surfaces of the grafts and in the recipient site. A space
filled by a high amount of cyanoacrylate (CA) remains between the graft and
the recipient site with a discrete inflammatory infiltrate
(hematoxylin-eosin - Original 63x)
Figure 5
Group II – 30 days: New bone formation observed between the bone graft and
the recipient site, in contact with the cyanoacrylate (CA)
(hematoxylin-eosin - Original 160x)
Group II – 30 days: Underneath, bone graft is linked to the recipient site
only in the graft margin. Areas of new bone formation (BN) are observed in
the internal surfaces of the grafts and in the recipient site. A space
filled by a high amount of cyanoacrylate (CA) remains between the graft and
the recipient site with a discrete inflammatory infiltrate
(hematoxylin-eosin - Original 63x)Group II – 30 days: New bone formation observed between the bone graft and
the recipient site, in contact with the cyanoacrylate (CA)
(hematoxylin-eosin - Original 160x)
Histometric and statistical results
The mean bone graft sizes (in pixels) were 319,865 (±21,611) and 302,268 (±18,099)
for Group I at 10 and 30 days, respectively, and 273,149 (±19,178) and 250,391
(±25,127) for Group II at 10 and 30 days, respectively (Figure 6). In the statistical analysis, when both results from 10
and 30 days were compared, there was no statistically significant difference between
Groups I and II (p<0.05).
Figure 6
Area of the bone graft fragment in Groups I and II at 10 and 30 days
Area of the bone graft fragment in Groups I and II at 10 and 30 days
DISCUSSION
Graft fixation has great importance in the graft resorption decrease, once the volume
loss is variable and inconstant. According to Lin, et al.[17] (1990), the screwed internal rigid fixation enhances the
life time of the onlay bone graft, decreasing its resorption when compared to the graft
that is not fixed or stabilized by steel wire, mainly in great mobility areas. In the
present investigation, it was not possible to use titanium screw for the graft fixation
because the thin rat parietal bone makes impracticable its use. Thus, bone fragments
fixed with the adhesive were compared to a group where the graft remained only
juxtaposed to the recipient site.The partial graft resorption is a natural process during its remodeling stage; however,
the presence of inflammatory reaction or micromovements tends to accelerate and
intensify this process[17]. It is
important to emphasize that the bone graft at rat calvaria, as proposed in the
experimental model of the present study, is not subjected to many movements; it is
maintained in position and becomes properly incorporated to the recipient site, as
observed in the control group at 10 and 30 days. Differently from the calvaria, in the
mouth, the constant movements of the muscles and food, makes essential the fixation of
the bone graft blocks. Graft stability is essential for the occurrence of
revascularization and graft incorporation[17,20].According to clinical observations, the technique for using the adhesive was very
simple, and, mechanically, the adhesive promoted a good adhesion of the graft to the
recipient site. This was demonstrated by the fact that the bone fragment remained stable
in both studied periods, confirming the good adhesive capacity of the ethyl-CA, which
has been shown in previous studies[11,23,27].It has been reported that the smaller the ester chain, the higher its
histotoxicity[10]. However,
regarding the inflammatory reaction provided by the adhesive, it was observed to be
higher at 10 days. At 30 days, a low intensity inflammation exhibited foreign body-type
multinucleate cells in areas adjacent to the CA fragments. These findings indicate that
the intense inflammatory reaction, produced by the material, has a short duration.
According to Celik, et al.[7] (1991),
the inflammation is caused by a reaction dependent on tissue oxygen, explained by the
transformation of the cellular membrane polyunsaturated fatty acids into hydroperoxide
lipids, which increases the metabolism of the local arachidonic acid, unleashing the
synthesis of tromboxane and prostaglandin.There are few studies in vivo on CA behavior in the bone tissue.
Clinical and experimental studies have demonstrated the adhesive efficacy to produce a
stable union of bone segments[1,8,12,14,16,27], however, the
histological still remain not conclusive. Saska, et al.[23] (2006), in a histomorphometric study utilizing rabbits
as experimental models, fixed autogenous graft fragments in the calvaria with ethyl-CA
adhesive. The results showed a discrete inflammatory infiltrate only at the first 15
postoperative days, which had totally receded at the posterior periods. In the present
study, in fact, it was observed a decrease in the inflammatory intensity. However, the
persistence of a discrete lymphocyte infiltrate associated with the presence of
multinucleated cells, especially at the graft margins where the connective tissue was in
direct contact with the adhesive, allow us to suggest that the material, though well
tolerated, did not behave in a biocompatible way.Similarly to the results of Saska, et al.[23] (2006), our findings showed that the physical presence of ethyl-CA
affected new bone formation. When CA fragments were suffering phagocytosis, granulation
tissues containing fibroblasts, newly formed blood vessels and lymphocyte-type
inflammatory infiltrate, were proliferating in the area. The formation of osseous
trabeculae occurred after this migration, showing that the material did not have an
osteoconductive or osteoinductive behavior, because it hampered the immediate new bone
formation and graft incorporation to the recipient site. This fact, associated with the
persistence of the discrete inflammatory process could explain the higher graft
resorption observed at both 10 and 30 postoperative days.Polymer degradation would be necessary for a complete repair process, providing results
similar to those provided by the conventional internal rigid fixation. However, as a
great amount of CA was still observed in the graft/recipient site interface, further
studies with longer experimental periods are suggested to determine the total bone
filling of the area and the maintenance or not of the graft bone size.
CONCLUSION
According to the methodology employed in this study, it was possible to conclude that,
although allowing the maintenance and stability of the graft fragment at 30 days, the
permanence of adhesive at the bone/graft interface did not allow graft incorporation to
the recipient site, producing a low intensity but persistent local inflammatory
reaction.
Authors: J M García Páez; E Jorge Herrero; A Rocha; M Maestro; J L Castillo-Olivares; I Millan; A Carrera Sanmartin; A Cordon Journal: J Mater Sci Mater Med Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 3.896
Authors: S Saska; E Hochuli-Vieira; A M Minarelli-Gaspar; M F R Gabrielli; M V Capela; M A C Gabrielli Journal: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2009-01-20 Impact factor: 2.789
Authors: Ken J Farion; Martin H Osmond; Lisa Hartling; Kelly F Russell; Terry P Klassen; Ellen Crumley; Natasha Wiebe Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 3.451