Literature DB >> 2385662

The effect of rigid fixation on the survival of onlay bone grafts: an experimental study.

K Y Lin1, S P Bartlett, M J Yaremchuk, M Fallon, R F Grossman, L A Whitaker.   

Abstract

Much attention has recently been focused on rigid fixation as a method of improving fracture healing. Whether such fixation, when applied to onlay grafting, improves graft take and volume is unknown. To examine this question, we compared survival of both endochondral and membranous grafts fixed rigidly and nonrigidly in areas of low motion (snout) and high motion (femur) in a rabbit model. Gross morphology, histologic analysis, and graft volume kinetics were evaluated. Findings demonstrate that in areas of high motion, the application of rigid fixation improves graft survival, whereas in a low-motion region, no differences in graft volume retention as a function of fixation were observed. Histologically, no differences with the method of fixation employed were seen, and similar revascularization patterns were noted. By kinetic analysis, rigid fixation appears to exert its most profound effect early in the postgraft period. Membranous bone grafts remain superior to endochondral grafts under all circumstances. From these studies, we conclude that rigid fixation is the method of choice in all circumstances where onlay bone grafts may be exposed to motion, shear, and torsional forces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2385662     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199009000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  18 in total

1.  Craniofacial Bone Grafting: Wolff's Law Revisited.

Authors:  Adam J Oppenheimer; Lawrence Tong; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2008-11

2.  Maxillofacial trauma.

Authors:  R A Hardesty
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1991-02

3.  Topographic analysis of the mandibular symphysis in a normal occlusion population using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Ji-Eun Lee; Yoon-Jin Lee; Seong-Ho Jin; Yoonji Kim; Yoon-Ah Kook; Youngkyung Ko; Jun-Beom Park
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 4.  [Regeneration instead of reparation: a critical review of the autogenous bone transplant as "golden standard" of reconstructive oral surgery].

Authors:  Hans-Henning Horch; Christoph Pautke
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2006-07

5.  Influence of host periosteum and recipient bed perforation on the healing of onlay mandibular bone graft: an experimental pilot study in the sheep.

Authors:  Wasiu L Adeyemo; Tobias Reuther; Wilhelm Bloch; Yuksel Korkmaz; Juergen H Fischer; Joachim E Zöller; Alexander C Kuebler
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-05

6.  Onlay bone grafts in head and neck reconstruction.

Authors:  Sukru Yazar
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 7.  A review of materials currently used in orbital floor reconstruction.

Authors:  David Mok; Lucie Lessard; Carlos Cordoba; Patrick G Harris; Andreas Nikolis
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2004

8.  [Use of a fibula bone span in alveolar ridge augmentation. Outcome after 2 years].

Authors:  R Bschorer; R Schmelzle
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  1997-09

9.  Decision-making algorithm in treatment of the atrophic mandible fractures.

Authors:  F De Feudis; M De Benedittis; V Antonicelli; P Pittore; R Cortelazzi
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr

10.  Effect of zoledronic acid on lumbar spinal fusion in osteoporotic patients.

Authors:  Qirui Ding; Jian Chen; Jin Fan; Qingqing Li; Guoyong Yin; Lipeng Yu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.