Literature DB >> 21985089

Consolidated bioprocessing strategy for ethanol production from Jerusalem artichoke tubers by Kluyveromyces marxianus under high gravity conditions.

W J Yuan1, B L Chang, J G Ren, J P Liu, F W Bai, Y Y Li.   

Abstract

AIMS: Developing an innovative process for ethanol fermentation from Jerusalem artichoke tubers under very high gravity (VHG) conditions. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A consolidated bioprocessing (CBP) strategy that integrated inulinase production, saccharification of inulin contained in Jerusalem artichoke tubers and ethanol production from sugars released from inulin by the enzyme was developed with the inulinase-producing yeast Kluyveromyces marxianus Y179 and fed-batch operation. The impact of inoculum age, aeration, the supplementation of pectinase and nutrients on the ethanol fermentation performance of the CBP system was studied. Although inulinase activities increased with the extension of the seed incubation time, its contribution to ethanol production was negligible because vigorously growing yeast cells harvested earlier carried out ethanol fermentation more efficiently. Thus, the overnight incubation that has been practised in ethanol production from starch-based feedstocks is recommended. Aeration facilitated the fermentation process, but compromised ethanol yield because of the negative Crabtree effect of the species, and increases the risk of contamination under industrial conditions. Therefore, nonaeration conditions are preferred for the CBP system. Pectinase supplementation reduced viscosity of the fermentation broth and improved ethanol production performance, particularly under high gravity conditions, but the enzyme cost should be carefully balanced. Medium optimization was performed, and ethanol concentration as high as 94·2 g l(-1) was achieved when 0·15 g l(-1) K(2) HPO(4) was supplemented, which presents a significant progress in ethanol production from Jerusalem artichoke tubers.
CONCLUSIONS: A CBP system using K. marxianus is suitable for efficient ethanol production from Jerusalem artichoke tubers under VHG conditions. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Jerusalem artichoke tubers are an alternative to grain-based feedstocks for ethanol production. The high ethanol concentration achieved using K. marxianus with the CBP system not only saves energy consumption for ethanol distillation, but also significantly reduces the amount of waste distillage discharged from the distillation system.
© 2011 The Authors. Journal of Applied Microbiology © 2011 The Society for Applied Microbiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21985089     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05171.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Microbiol        ISSN: 1364-5072            Impact factor:   3.772


  13 in total

Review 1.  Utilization of inulin-containing waste in industrial fermentations to produce biofuels and bio-based chemicals.

Authors:  Stephen R Hughes; Nasib Qureshi; Juan Carlos López-Núñez; Marjorie A Jones; Joshua M Jarodsky; Luz Ángela Galindo-Leva; Mitchell R Lindquist
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Consolidated ethanol production from Jerusalem artichoke tubers at elevated temperature by Saccharomyces cerevisiae engineered with inulinase expression through cell surface display.

Authors:  M Mahfuza Khatun; Chen-Guang Liu; Xin-Qing Zhao; Wen-Jie Yuan; Feng-Wu Bai
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 3.  Ethanol stress responses in Kluyveromyces marxianus: current knowledge and perspectives.

Authors:  Maurício Alexander de Moura Ferreira; Fernando Augusto da Silveira; Wendel Batista da Silveira
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Invertase SUC2 Is the key hydrolase for inulin degradation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Shi-An Wang; Fu-Li Li
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 5.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for second-generation ethanol production: from academic exploration to industrial implementation.

Authors:  Mickel L A Jansen; Jasmine M Bracher; Ioannis Papapetridis; Maarten D Verhoeven; Hans de Bruijn; Paul P de Waal; Antonius J A van Maris; Paul Klaassen; Jack T Pronk
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.796

6.  Transcriptional analysis of Kluyveromyces marxianus for ethanol production from inulin using consolidated bioprocessing technology.

Authors:  Jiaoqi Gao; Wenjie Yuan; Yimin Li; Ruijuan Xiang; Shengbo Hou; Shijun Zhong; Fengwu Bai
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 6.040

7.  Synergy of crude enzyme cocktail from cold-adapted Cladosporium cladosporioides Ch2-2 with commercial xylanase achieving high sugars yield at low cost.

Authors:  Lei Ji; Jinshui Yang; Hua Fan; Yi Yang; Baozhen Li; Xuejian Yu; Ning Zhu; Hongli Yuan
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 6.040

8.  Comparative analysis of the secretomes of Schizophyllum commune and other wood-decay basidiomycetes during solid-state fermentation reveals its unique lignocellulose-degrading enzyme system.

Authors:  Ning Zhu; Jiawen Liu; Jinshui Yang; Yujian Lin; Yi Yang; Lei Ji; Meng Li; Hongli Yuan
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 6.040

9.  Engineering a natural Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain for ethanol production from inulin by consolidated bioprocessing.

Authors:  Da Wang; Fu-Li Li; Shi-An Wang
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 6.040

10.  Growth, ethanol production, and inulinase activity on various inulin substrates by mutant Kluyveromyces marxianus strains NRRL Y-50798 and NRRL Y-50799.

Authors:  Luz Ángela Galindo-Leva; Stephen R Hughes; Juan Carlos López-Núñez; Joshua M Jarodsky; Adam Erickson; Mitchell R Lindquist; Elby J Cox; Kenneth M Bischoff; Eric C Hoecker; Siqing Liu; Nasib Qureshi; Marjorie A Jones
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.346

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.