Literature DB >> 35091763

Ethanol stress responses in Kluyveromyces marxianus: current knowledge and perspectives.

Maurício Alexander de Moura Ferreira1, Fernando Augusto da Silveira2, Wendel Batista da Silveira3,4.   

Abstract

The rising concern with the emission of greenhouse gases has boosted new incentives for biofuels production, which are less polluting than fossil fuels. Special attention has been given to the second-generation ethanol, as it is produced from abundant feedstocks which do not compete with food production, such as lignocellulosic biomass and whey. Kluyveromyces marxianus stands out in second-generation ethanol production due to its capacity of assimilating lactose, the sugar found in whey, and tolerating high temperatures used in simultaneous saccharification processes. Nonetheless, contrary to Saccharomyces cerevisiae, K. marxianus does not tolerate high ethanol concentrations. Ethanol causes a broad range of toxic effects on yeasts, acting on cell membrane and proteins, as well as inducing the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). The ethanol stress responses are not fully understood, mainly in non-conventional yeasts such as K. marxianus. Indeed, many molecular responses to ethanol stress are still inferred from S. cerevisiae. As such, a better understanding of the ethanol stress responses in K. marxianus may provide the basis for improving its use in the biofuel industry. Additionally, the selection of ethanol-tolerant strains by metabolic engineering is useful to provide strains with improved capacity to withstand stressful conditions, as well as to obtain new insights about the ethanol stress responses. Key points • It is still not totally clear why K. marxianus is less tolerant to ethanol than S. cerevisiae. • Understanding the ethanol stress response in K. marxianus is pivotal for improving its application in the biofuel industry. • The Metabolic engineering is expected to improve the ethanol tolerance in K. marxianus.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ethanol tolerance; Metabolic engineering; Second-generation ethanol; Stressful conditions; Yeasts

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35091763     DOI: 10.1007/s00253-022-11799-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0175-7598            Impact factor:   4.813


  57 in total

1.  Genome evolution and adaptation in a long-term experiment with Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Barrick; Dong Su Yu; Sung Ho Yoon; Haeyoung Jeong; Tae Kwang Oh; Dominique Schneider; Richard E Lenski; Jihyun F Kim
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-18       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Ethanol Inhibition Kinetics of Kluyveromyces marxianus Grown on Jerusalem Artichoke Juice.

Authors:  P Bajpai; A Margaritis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 3.  Cellular strategies of protein quality control.

Authors:  Bryan Chen; Marco Retzlaff; Thomas Roos; Judith Frydman
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 10.005

4.  A universal measure of chaotropicity and kosmotropicity.

Authors:  Jonathan A Cray; John T Russell; David J Timson; Rekha S Singhal; John E Hallsworth
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 5.491

Review 5.  Trifluoroethanol and colleagues: cosolvents come of age. Recent studies with peptides and proteins.

Authors:  M Buck
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.318

6.  Native yeasts for alternative utilization of overripe mango pulp for ethanol production.

Authors:  Juan Buenrostro-Figueroa; Julio C Tafolla-Arellano; Adriana C Flores-Gallegos; Raúl Rodríguez-Herrera; Heliodoro De la Garza-Toledo; Cristóbal N Aguilar
Journal:  Rev Argent Microbiol       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 1.852

7.  Vacuolar H+-ATPase Protects Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cells against Ethanol-Induced Oxidative and Cell Wall Stresses.

Authors:  Sirikarn Charoenbhakdi; Thanittra Dokpikul; Thanawat Burphan; Todsapol Techo; Choowong Auesukaree
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Trehalose promotes the survival of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during lethal ethanol stress, but does not influence growth under sublethal ethanol stress.

Authors:  Ajith Bandara; Sarah Fraser; Paul J Chambers; Grant A Stanley
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Physiological characterization of thermotolerant yeast for cellulosic ethanol production.

Authors:  Daniela A Costa; Carlos J A de Souza; Patrícia S Costa; Marina Q R B Rodrigues; Ancély F dos Santos; Mariana R Lopes; Hugo L A Genier; Wendel B Silveira; Luciano G Fietto
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Identification of target genes to control acetate yield during aerobic fermentation with Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  José Antonio Curiel; Zoel Salvadó; Jordi Tronchoni; Pilar Morales; Alda Joao Rodrigues; Manuel Quirós; Ramón Gonzalez
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 5.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.