Literature DB >> 21984522

Kinesthetic motor imagery modulates intermuscular coherence.

Cara E Stepp1, Nominerdene Oyunerdene, Yoky Matsuoka.   

Abstract

Intermuscular coherence can identify oscillatory coupling between two electromyographic (EMG) signals, measuring common presynaptic drive to motor neurons. Beta band oscillations (15-30 Hz) are hypothesized to originate largely from primary motor cortex, and are reduced during dynamic relative to static motor tasks. It has yet to be established whether motor imagery modulates beta intermuscular coherence. Using visual feedback, 10 unimpaired participants completed eighteen trials of pinching their right thumb and index finger at a constant force. During the 60-second trials, participants simultaneously engaged in one of three types of kinesthetic imagery: the right thumb and index finger executing a constant force pinch (static), the fingers of the right hand sequentially flexing and extending (dynamic), and the right foot pushing down with constant force (foot). Motor imagery of a dynamic motor task resulted in significantly lower intermuscular beta coherence than imagery of a static motor pinch task, without any difference in task performance or root-mean-square EMG. Thus, motor imagery affects intermuscular coherence in the beta band, even while measures of task performance remain constant. This finding provides insight for incorporation of beta band intermuscular coherence in future motor rehabilitation schemes and brain computer interface design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21984522      PMCID: PMC3401579          DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2168982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng        ISSN: 1534-4320            Impact factor:   3.802


  25 in total

1.  Effects of attention and precision of exerted force on beta range EEG-EMG synchronization during a maintained motor contraction task.

Authors:  Rumyana Kristeva-Feige; Christoph Fritsch; Jens Timmer; Carl-Hermann Lücking
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Coherence between cortical and muscular activities after subcortical stroke.

Authors:  T Mima; K Toma; B Koshy; M Hallett
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Intermittency in the control of continuous force production.

Authors:  A B Slifkin; D E Vaillancourt; K M Newell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Digital nerve anaesthesia decreases EMG-EMG coherence in a human precision grip task.

Authors:  R J Fisher; M P Galea; P Brown; R N Lemon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-05-16       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  EEG-EMG, MEG-EMG and EMG-EMG frequency analysis: physiological principles and clinical applications.

Authors:  P Grosse; M J Cassidy; P Brown
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Effect of grip span on lateral pinch grip strength.

Authors:  Carrie L Shivers; Gary A Mirka; David B Kaber
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.888

7.  Coupling of oscillatory activity between muscles is strikingly reduced in a deafferented subject compared with normal controls.

Authors:  J M Kilner; R J Fisher; R N Lemon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-04-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  The Fourier approach to the identification of functional coupling between neuronal spike trains.

Authors:  J R Rosenberg; A M Amjad; P Breeze; D R Brillinger; D M Halliday
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.667

9.  Rectification of the EMG signal impairs the identification of oscillatory input to the muscle.

Authors:  Osmar Pinto Neto; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-23       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  The frequency content of common synaptic inputs to motoneurones studied during voluntary isometric contraction in man.

Authors:  S F Farmer; F D Bremner; D M Halliday; J R Rosenberg; J A Stephens
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.