Literature DB >> 21983891

Dynamic contour tonometry and goldman applanation tonometry: correlation with intracameral assessment of intraocular pressure.

Ivano Riva, Luciano Quaranta, Andrea Russo, Andreas Katsanos, Eliana Rulli, Irene Floriani.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21983891     DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5000067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1120-6721            Impact factor:   2.597


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Dependence of dynamic contour and Goldmann applanation tonometries on peripheral corneal thickness.

Authors:  Federico Saenz-Frances; Claudia Sanz-Pozo; Lara Borrego-Sanz; Luis Jañez; Laura Morales-Fernandez; Jose Maria Martinez-de-la-Casa; Julian Garcia-Sanchez; Julian Garcia-Feijoo; Enrique Santos-Bueso
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Goldmann and error correcting tonometry prisms compared to intracameral pressure.

Authors:  Sean McCafferty; Jason Levine; Jim Schwiegerling; Eniko T Enikov
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 2.209

3.  Goldmann applanation tonometry error relative to true intracameral intraocular pressure in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Sean McCafferty; Jason Levine; Jim Schwiegerling; Eniko T Enikov
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-25       Impact factor: 2.209

4.  Analysis of differences in intraocular pressure evaluation performed with contact and non-contact devices.

Authors:  Michele Lanza; Michele Rinaldi; Ugo Antonello Gironi Carnevale; Silvio di Staso; Mario Bifani Sconocchia; Ciro Costagliola
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-03       Impact factor: 2.209

5.  Goldmann tonometry tear film error and partial correction with a shaped applanation surface.

Authors:  Sean J McCafferty; Eniko T Enikov; Jim Schwiegerling; Sean M Ashley
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-01-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.