Literature DB >> 21982666

Frequency and correlates of treatment intensification for elevated cholesterol levels in patients with cardiovascular disease.

Salim S Virani1, LeChauncy D Woodard, Supicha S Chitwood, Cassie R Landrum, Tracy H Urech, Degang Wang, Jeffrey Murawsky, Christie M Ballantyne, Laura A Petersen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although current performance measures define low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels <100 mg/dL in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) as good quality, they provide a snapshot and do not address whether treatment intensification was performed to manage elevated LDL-C levels.
METHODS: We determined the proportion of patients with CVD (n = 22,888) with LDL-C <100 mg/dL and the proportion with uncontrolled LDL-C levels (≥100 mg/dL) who received treatment intensification within the 45-day follow-up in a Veterans Affairs Network. We evaluated facility, provider, and patient correlates of treatment intensification.
RESULTS: Low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol levels were at goal in 16,350 (71.4%) patients. An additional 2,093 (one third of those eligible for treatment intensification) received treatment intensification. Controlling for clustering between facilities and patient's illness severity: history of diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% CI 1.01-1.32), hypertension (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01-1.42), good medication adherence (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.91-2.54), and a higher number of lipid panels (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.14-1.27) were associated with treatment intensification. Patients older than 75 years (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.56-0.75) and women (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.43-1.00) were less likely to receive treatment intensification. Teaching status of the facility, physician or specialist primary care provider, and patient's race were not associated with treatment intensification.
CONCLUSIONS: Only one third of the CVD patients with elevated LDL-C received treatment intensification. Diabetic and hypertensive patients were more likely to receive treatment intensification, whereas, older patients, female patients, and patients with poor medication adherence were less likely to receive treatment intensification. Our findings highlight areas for quality improvement initiatives.
Copyright © 2011 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21982666     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.07.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  18 in total

Review 1.  Statins in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women: facts and myths.

Authors:  Salim S Virani
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2013

2.  Implementation strategies to improve non-HDL-cholesterol goal attainment: current evidence and a conceptual framework for future directions.

Authors:  Salim S Virani
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2012

3.  Impact of Gender on Satisfaction and Confidence in Cholesterol Control Among Veterans at Risk for Cardiovascular Disease.

Authors:  Karen M Goldstein; Karen M Stechuchak; Leah L Zullig; Eugene Z Oddone; Maren K Olsen; Felicia A McCant; Lori A Bastian; Bryan C Batch; Hayden B Bosworth
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 2.681

4.  Impact of gender difference on long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary artery disease in patients under statin treatment.

Authors:  Hideki Wada; Manabu Ogita; Katsumi Miyauchi; Jun Shitara; Hirohisa Endo; Shinichiro Doi; Ryo Naito; Hirokazu Konishi; Shuta Tsuboi; Tomotaka Dohi; Takatoshi Kasai; Hiroshi Tamura; Shinya Okazaki; Kikuo Isoda; Satoru Suwa; Hiroyuki Daida
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Treating chronically ill people with diabetes mellitus with limited life expectancy: implications for performance measurement.

Authors:  LeChauncy D Woodard; Cassie R Landrum; Tracy H Urech; Jochen Profit; Salim S Virani; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 5.562

6.  Guideline-directed statin intensification in patients with new or worsening symptoms of peripheral artery disease.

Authors:  Yevgeniy Khariton; Krishna K Patel; Paul S Chan; Yashashwi Pokharel; Jingyan Wang; John A Spertus; David M Safley; William R Hiatt; Kim G Smolderen
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 2.882

7.  Medication Adherence Does Not Explain Black-White Differences in Cardiometabolic Risk Factor Control among Insured Patients with Diabetes.

Authors:  Jennifer Elston Lafata; Andrew J Karter; Patrick J O'Connor; Heather Morris; Julie A Schmittdiel; Scott Ratliff; Katherine M Newton; Marsha A Raebel; Ram D Pathak; Abraham Thomas; Melissa G Butler; Kristi Reynolds; Beth Waitzfelder; John F Steiner
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Impact of performance improvement continuing medical education on cardiometabolic risk factor control: the COSEHC initiative.

Authors:  JaNae Joyner; Michael A Moore; Debra R Simmons; Brian Forrest; Kristina Yu-Isenberg; Ron Piccione; Kirt Caton; Daniel T Lackland; Carlos M Ferrario
Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Variation in Lipid-Lowering Therapy Use in Patients With Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol ≥190 mg/dL: Insights From the National Cardiovascular Data Registry-Practice Innovation and Clinical Excellence Registry.

Authors:  Salim S Virani; Kevin F Kennedy; Julia M Akeroyd; Pamela B Morris; Vera A Bittner; Frederick A Masoudi; Neil J Stone; Laura A Petersen; Christie M Ballantyne
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2018-05

10.  Impact of clinical complexity on the quality of diabetes care.

Authors:  LeChauncy D Woodard; Cassie R Landrum; Tracy H Urech; Degang Wang; Salim S Virani; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.