BACKGROUND: We analyzed serial data in patients with clinically stable monoclonal gammopathy to determine the total variation of serum M-spikes [measured with serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP)], urine M-spikes [measured with urine protein electrophoresis (UPEP)], and monoclonal serum free light chain (FLC) concentrations measured with immunoassay. METHODS: Patients to be studied were identified by (a) no treatment during the study interval, (b) no change in diagnosis and <5 g/L change in serum M-spike over the course of observation; (c) performance of all 3 tests (SPEP, UPEP, FLC immunoassay) in at least 3 serial samples that were obtained 9 months to 5 years apart; (d) serum M-spike ≥10 g/L, urine M-spike ≥200 mg/24 h, or clonal FLC ≥100 mg/L. The total CV was calculated for each method. RESULTS: Among the cohort of 158 patients, 90 had measurable serum M-spikes, 25 had urine M-spikes, and 52 had measurable serum FLC abnormalities. The CVs were calculated for serial SPEP M-spikes (8.1%), UPEP M-spikes (35.8%), and serum FLC concentrations (28.4%). Combining these CVs and the interassay analytical CVs, we calculated the biological CV for the serum M-spike (7.8%), urine M-spike (35.5%), and serum FLC concentration (27.8%). CONCLUSIONS: The variations in urine M-spike and serum FLC measurements during patient monitoring are similar and are larger than those for serum M-spikes. In addition, in this group of stable patients, a measurable serum FLC concentration was available twice as often as a measurable urine M-spike.
BACKGROUND: We analyzed serial data in patients with clinically stable monoclonal gammopathy to determine the total variation of serum M-spikes [measured with serum protein electrophoresis (SPEP)], urine M-spikes [measured with urine protein electrophoresis (UPEP)], and monoclonal serum free light chain (FLC) concentrations measured with immunoassay. METHODS:Patients to be studied were identified by (a) no treatment during the study interval, (b) no change in diagnosis and <5 g/L change in serum M-spike over the course of observation; (c) performance of all 3 tests (SPEP, UPEP, FLC immunoassay) in at least 3 serial samples that were obtained 9 months to 5 years apart; (d) serum M-spike ≥10 g/L, urine M-spike ≥200 mg/24 h, or clonal FLC ≥100 mg/L. The total CV was calculated for each method. RESULTS: Among the cohort of 158 patients, 90 had measurable serum M-spikes, 25 had urine M-spikes, and 52 had measurable serum FLC abnormalities. The CVs were calculated for serial SPEP M-spikes (8.1%), UPEP M-spikes (35.8%), and serum FLC concentrations (28.4%). Combining these CVs and the interassay analytical CVs, we calculated the biological CV for the serum M-spike (7.8%), urine M-spike (35.5%), and serum FLC concentration (27.8%). CONCLUSIONS: The variations in urine M-spike and serum FLC measurements during patient monitoring are similar and are larger than those for serum M-spikes. In addition, in this group of stable patients, a measurable serum FLC concentration was available twice as often as a measurable urine M-spike.
Authors: Angela Dispenzieri; Martha Q Lacy; Jerry A Katzmann; S Vincent Rajkumar; Roshini S Abraham; Suzanne R Hayman; Shaji K Kumar; Raynell Clark; Robert A Kyle; Mark R Litzow; David J Inwards; Stephen M Ansell; Ivana M Micallef; Luis F Porrata; Michelle A Elliott; Patrick B Johnston; Philip R Greipp; Thomas E Witzig; Steven R Zeldenrust; Stephen J Russell; Dennis Gastineau; Morie A Gertz Journal: Blood Date: 2006-01-05 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Angela Dispenzieri; Lijun Zhang; Jerry A Katzmann; Melissa Snyder; Emily Blood; Roberta Degoey; Kimberly Henderson; Robert A Kyle; Martin M Oken; Arthur R Bradwell; Philip R Greipp Journal: Blood Date: 2008-03-25 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Morie A Gertz; Ray Comenzo; Rodney H Falk; Jean Paul Fermand; Bouke P Hazenberg; Philip N Hawkins; Giampaolo Merlini; Philippe Moreau; Pierre Ronco; Vaishali Sanchorawala; Orhan Sezer; Alan Solomon; Giles Grateau Journal: Am J Hematol Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 10.047
Authors: B G M Durie; J-L Harousseau; J S Miguel; J Bladé; B Barlogie; K Anderson; M Gertz; M Dimopoulos; J Westin; P Sonneveld; H Ludwig; G Gahrton; M Beksac; J Crowley; A Belch; M Boccadaro; M Cavo; I Turesson; D Joshua; D Vesole; R Kyle; R Alexanian; G Tricot; M Attal; G Merlini; R Powles; P Richardson; K Shimizu; P Tosi; G Morgan; S V Rajkumar Journal: Leukemia Date: 2006-07-20 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Adam D Cohen; Ping Zhou; Joanne Chou; Julie Teruya-Feldstein; Lilian Reich; Hani Hassoun; Beth Levine; Daniel A Filippa; Elyn Riedel; Tarun Kewalramani; Michael D Stubblefield; Martin Fleisher; Stephen Nimer; Raymond L Comenzo Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Helen J Lachmann; Ruth Gallimore; Julian D Gillmore; Hugh D Carr-Smith; Arthur R Bradwell; Mark B Pepys; Philip N Hawkins Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: Jerry A Katzmann; Raynell J Clark; Roshini S Abraham; Sandra Bryant; James F Lymp; Arthur R Bradwell; Robert A Kyle Journal: Clin Chem Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 8.327
Authors: S H K Murng; L Follows; P Whitfield; J A Snowden; K Swallow; K Green; R Sargur; W Egner Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 4.330