Literature DB >> 21979906

[Diagnosis prostate cancer: who makes the treatment decision and which treatment is selected? Opinion survey in a prostate cancer patient support group].

D Schnell1, H Fiebrandt, L Weissbach.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is challenging to decide in which way we should care for localized prostate cancer. The current guideline can be accepted as an appropriate foundation. However, there are doubts if guideline recommendations are implemented.
RESULTS: The presented opinion survey of prostate cancer support groups shows that we have too many prostatectomies in senior patients. It reveals deficiencies in the guidance of the patients. They are not sufficiently embedded in the process of decision-making. More attention should be paid to initiatives of patient support groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21979906     DOI: 10.1007/s00120-011-2725-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urologe A        ISSN: 0340-2592            Impact factor:   0.639


  8 in total

1.  An analysis of sexual health information on radical prostatectomy websites.

Authors:  John P Mulhall; Cesar Rojaz-Cruz; Alexander Müller
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  [Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: do older patients have an increased risk?].

Authors:  H Borrusch; G Müller; U Otto
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Prostate cancer in the older man: conflict between tumor biology and medical advancement.

Authors:  James M Cummings
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.076

Review 4.  Background for the proposal of SIOG guidelines for the management of prostate cancer in senior adults.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Droz; Lodovico Balducci; Michel Bolla; Mark Emberton; John M Fitzpatrick; Steven Joniau; Michael W Kattan; Silvio Monfardini; Judd W Moul; Arash Naeim; Hendrik van Poppel; Fred Saad; Cora N Sternberg
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.312

5.  Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in localized prostate cancer: the Scandinavian prostate cancer group-4 randomized trial.

Authors:  Anna Bill-Axelson; Lars Holmberg; Frej Filén; Mirja Ruutu; Hans Garmo; Christer Busch; Stig Nordling; Michael Häggman; Swen-Olof Andersson; Stefan Bratell; Anders Spångberg; Juni Palmgren; Hans-Olov Adami; Jan-Erik Johansson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  'As long as the doctors know what they are doing': trust or ambivalence about patient information among elderly men with prostate cancer?

Authors:  Hilary Bungay; R Cappello
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.520

Review 7.  Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and harms of treatments for clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Timothy J Wilt; Roderick MacDonald; Indulis Rutks; Tatyana A Shamliyan; Brent C Taylor; Robert L Kane
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Quality of life three years after diagnosis of localised prostate cancer: population based cohort study.

Authors:  David P Smith; Madeleine T King; Sam Egger; Martin P Berry; Phillip D Stricker; Paul Cozzi; Jeanette Ward; Dianne L O'Connell; Bruce K Armstrong
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-11-27
  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  [Elderly prostate cancer patients: patient information and shared decision making].

Authors:  N Ernstmann; J Jaeger; C Kowalski; H Pfaff; L Weißbach
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 0.639

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.