Literature DB >> 19627282

An analysis of sexual health information on radical prostatectomy websites.

John P Mulhall1, Cesar Rojaz-Cruz, Alexander Müller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To define the nature of information posted on websites related to radical prostatectomy (RP), specifically its accuracy and comprehensiveness, as RP is associated with erectile dysfunction (ED).
METHODS: We reviewed 70 robotic RP (RARP) and 20 open RP (ORP) medical centres. Their websites were reviewed for various factors, by two separate reviewers whose reviews were not seen by each other. Websites were graded based on accuracy and comprehensiveness of information by the senior investigator.
RESULTS: Of the academic and community-based RARP centres, 55% and 79% had specific websites (P < 0.05); 45% of RARP sites had generic information copied directly from the website of Intuitive Surgical (Sunnyvale, CA, USA; the manufacturer of the robotic system). ED was mentioned by only 54% of RARP sites and 45% of ORP sites; 17% of RARP sites were deemed accurate, compared with 30% of ORP sites (P < 0.05). Just over 1% of RARP sites were considered comprehensive, vs 10% of ORP sites (P < 0.05). A third of RARP sites had a direct link to the Intuitive Surgical website (16% academic vs 53% community, P < 0.05), compared to 10% of open sites (P < 0.05). Of most interest was that half of the RARP sites suggested that ED rates were lower for RARP than for ORP; this compared to ED rates being cited as lower for ORP on 5% of the ORP sites (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the stature of RP as a treatment option for men with prostate cancer, and the recent increase in the use of RARP, the accuracy of information pertaining to sexual health on RP websites is poor, with many making false statements about the long-term outcomes for erectile function. This inadequacy appears to be greater on RARP than on ORP websites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19627282     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08762.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  12 in total

1.  Accuracy of marketing claims by providers of stereotactic radiation therapy.

Authors:  Amol K Narang; Edwin Lam; Martin A Makary; Theodore L Deweese; Timothy M Pawlik; Peter J Pronovost; Joseph M Herman
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 2.  Psychosocial perspectives on sexual recovery after prostate cancer treatment.

Authors:  Lauren M Walker; Richard J Wassersug; John W Robinson
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Temporal trends and predictors of pelvic lymph node dissection in open or minimally invasive radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Andrew H Feifer; Elena B Elkin; William T Lowrance; Brian Denton; Lindsay Jacks; David S Yee; Jonathan A Coleman; Vincent P Laudone; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 4.  Robotic Surgical System for Radical Prostatectomy: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2017-07-07

5.  [Diagnosis prostate cancer: who makes the treatment decision and which treatment is selected? Opinion survey in a prostate cancer patient support group].

Authors:  D Schnell; H Fiebrandt; L Weissbach
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Evaluation of patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes after renal surgery.

Authors:  Sarah B Kim; Stephen B Williams; Su-Chun Cheng; Martin G Sanda; Andrew A Wagner
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-04-28       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Is a return to baseline sexual function possible? An analysis of sexual function outcomes following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Adam W Levinson; Hugh J Lavery; Nicholas T Ward; Li-Ming Su; Christian P Pavlovich
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Trends in internet search activity, media coverage, and patient-centered health information after the FDA safety communications on surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Benjamin V Stone; James C Forde; Valerie B Levit; Richard K Lee; Alexis E Te; Bilal Chughtai
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-05-21       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Back to baseline: erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy from the patients' perspective.

Authors:  Christian J Nelson; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; John P Mulhall
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.802

10.  Trends in immediate perioperative morbidity and delay in discharge after open and minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (RP): a 20-year institutional experience.

Authors:  Phillip M Pierorazio; Jeffrey K Mullins; Ashley E Ross; Elias S Hyams; Alan W Partin; Misop Han; Patrick C Walsh; Edward M Schaeffer; Christian P Pavlovich; Mohamad E Allaf; Trinity J Bivalacqua
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.