| Literature DB >> 21978632 |
Madhu Gowda1, Kamar Godder, Maciej Kmieciak, Andrea Worschech, Maria-Libera Ascierto, Ena Wang, Francesco M Marincola, Masoud H Manjili.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Over 90% of low risk (LR) neuroblastoma patients survive whereas less than 30% of high risk (HR) patients are long term survivors. Age (children younger than 18 months old) is associated with LR disease. Considering that adaptive immune system is well developed in older children, and that T cells were shown to be involved in tumor escape and progression of cancers, we sought to determine whether HR patients may tend to show a signature of adaptive immune responses compared to LR patients who tend to have diminished T-cell responses but an intact innate immune response.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21978632 PMCID: PMC3195752 DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-9-170
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Patients' characteristics
| Patients | Risk group | N-myc | Ploidy | Stage | Shimada | Agae (m) | Sex |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | HR | Unknown | Unknown | 4 | UF | 59 | M |
| 3 | HR | No | > 1 | 4 | UF | 54 | M |
| 4 | HR | Yes | > 1 | 4 | F | 22 | F |
| 15 | HR | Yes | > 1 | 3 | UF | 114 | F |
| 10 | HR | Yes | 1 | 4 | UF | 24 | M |
| 13 | HR | No | > 1 | 3 | UF | 18 | F |
| 6 | HR | Yes | 1 | 3 | UF | 55 | M |
| 17 | HR | Yes | > 1 | 3 | UF | 23 | M |
| 18 | HR | Yes | 1 | 4 | UF | 20 | M |
| 1 | LR | No | > 1 | 1 | F | 22 | F |
| 7 | LR | No | > 1 | 2b | Unknown | 19 | M |
| 11 | LR | No | > 1 | 4s | F | 5 | M |
| 12 | LR | No | > 1 | 2b | F | 4 | F |
| 9 | LR | No | > 1 | 2a | F | 3 | M |
| 14 | LR | No | > 1 | 1 | Unknown | 6 | M |
| 5 | LR | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | 28 | F |
| 16 | LR | No | Unknown | 1 | F | 1 | M |
| 20 | LR | No | 1 | 2a | F | 41 | M |
HR: high risk; LR: low risk; UF: unfavorable; F: favorable; M: male; F: female
Figure 1Differential gene expression profile in tumor lesions of patients with HR vs. LR neuroblastoma. A) Unsupervised cluster analysis of LR vs. HR patients. B) Supervised cluster analysis (Student t test, p < 0.01 and fold change > 3) comparing LR vs. HR. C) Canonical pathway analysis shows the significant genes and pathways that differ between HR and LR neuroblastoma.
Figures 2LR patients show higher titers of IL-10, IL-1β and MCP-1 in their sera. Multiplex cytokine array analyses of the sera of patients with LR and HR neuroblastoma for detected higher levels of IL-10 (A) IL-1β (B), and MCP-1 (C) in LR patients. Data represent 4-6 HR and 6-7 LR patients.
Figures 3HR patients show an increased adaptive immunity compared to LR patients. Flow cytometric analysis of PBMC of patients with HR (n = 3) and LR (n = 1) neuroblastoma.
Figure 4IL-1β induces expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in SK-N-SH tumor cell line. A) Flow cytometry analysis of SK-N-SH tumor cell line in the absence or presence of IL-1β after 24 hs and 72 hs culture in vitro. Data represent four independent experiments. B) Multiplex cytokine array analysis of supernatants of SK-N-SH tumor cells cultured in the absence or presence of IL-1β after 24 hs and 72 hs for the detection of MCP-1, GM-CSF and TNF-α.