Literature DB >> 21976384

Flexibility in embodied lexical-semantic representations.

Wessel O van Dam1, Margriet van Dijk, Harold Bekkering, Shirley-Ann Rueschemeyer.   

Abstract

According to an embodied view of language comprehension, language concepts are grounded in our perceptual systems. Evidence for the idea that concepts are grounded in areas involved in action and perception comes from both behavioral and neuroimaging studies (Glenberg [1997]: Behav Brain Sci 20:1-55; Barsalou [1999]: Behav Brain Sci 22:577-660; Pulvermueller [1999]: Behav Brain Sci 22:253-336; Barsalou et al. [2003]: Trends Cogn Sci 7:84-91). However, the results from several studies indicate that the activation of information in perception and action areas is not a purely automatic process (Raposo et al. [2009]: Neuropsychologia 47:388-396; Rueschemeyer et al. [2007]: J Cogn Neurosci 19:855-865). These findings suggest that embodied representations are flexible. In these studies, flexibility is characterized by the relative presence or absence of activation in our perceptual systems. However, even if the context in which a word is presented does not undermine a motor interpretation, it is possible that the degree to which a modality-specific region contributes to a representation depends on the context in which conceptual features are retrieved. In the present study, we investigated this issue by presenting word stimuli for which both motor and visual properties (e.g., Tennis ball, Boxing glove) were important in constituting the concept. Conform with the idea that language representations are flexible and context dependent, we demonstrate that the degree to which a modality-specific region contributes to a representation considerably changes as a function of context.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21976384      PMCID: PMC6869997          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.21365

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  48 in total

Review 1.  Words in the brain's language.

Authors:  F Pulvermüller
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Neurophysiological distinction of verb categories.

Authors:  F Pulvermüller; M Härle; F Hummel
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-08-21       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Distinct prefrontal cortex activity associated with item memory and source memory for visual shapes.

Authors:  Scott D Slotnick; Lauren R Moo; Jessica B Segal; John Hart
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2003-06

4.  Representing the meanings of object and action words: the featural and unitary semantic space hypothesis.

Authors:  Gabriella Vigliocco; David P Vinson; William Lewis; Merrill F Garrett
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  How specifically are action verbs represented in the neural motor system: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Wessel O van Dam; Shirley-Ann Rueschemeyer; Harold Bekkering
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Conceptual representations of action in the lateral temporal cortex.

Authors:  Joseph W Kable; Irene P Kan; Ashley Wilson; Sharon L Thompson-Schill; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  fMRI evidence for word association and situated simulation in conceptual processing.

Authors:  W Kyle Simmons; Stephan B Hamann; Carla L Harenski; Xiaoping P Hu; Lawrence W Barsalou
Journal:  J Physiol Paris       Date:  2008-04-01

8.  Domain specificity in visual cortex.

Authors:  P E Downing; A W-Y Chan; M V Peelen; C M Dodds; N Kanwisher
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 9.  Language outside the focus of attention: the mismatch negativity as a tool for studying higher cognitive processes.

Authors:  Friedemann Pulvermüller; Yury Shtyrov
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 11.685

10.  Grasping ideas with the motor system: semantic somatotopy in idiom comprehension.

Authors:  Véronique Boulenger; Olaf Hauk; Friedemann Pulvermüller
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  32 in total

1.  Are the motor features of verb meanings represented in the precentral motor cortices? Yes, but within the context of a flexible, multilevel architecture for conceptual knowledge.

Authors:  David Kemmerer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

2.  Sentence plausibility influences the link between action words and the perception of biological human movements.

Authors:  Christel Bidet-Ildei; Manuel Gimenes; Lucette Toussaint; Yves Almecija; Arnaud Badets
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-05-31

3.  Concepts within reach: Action performance predicts action language processing in stroke.

Authors:  Rutvik H Desai; Troy Herter; Nicholas Riccardi; Chris Rorden; Julius Fridriksson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Effects of motion speed in action representations.

Authors:  Wessel O van Dam; Laura J Speed; Vicky T Lai; Gabriella Vigliocco; Rutvik H Desai
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  What is embodied about cognition?

Authors:  Bradford Z Mahon
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 2.331

6.  Updating spatial relations to remote locations described in narratives.

Authors:  Adamantini Hatzipanayioti; Alexia Galati; Marios N Avraamides
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-11

7.  Neuronal interactions between mentalising and action systems during indirect request processing.

Authors:  Markus J van Ackeren; Areti Smaragdi; Shirley-Ann Rueschemeyer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 8.  Linking somatic and symbolic representation in semantic memory: the dynamic multilevel reactivation framework.

Authors:  Jamie Reilly; Jonathan E Peelle; Amanda Garcia; Sebastian J Crutch
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

Review 9.  Putting concepts into context.

Authors:  Eiling Yee; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

Review 10.  Arguments about the nature of concepts: Symbols, embodiment, and beyond.

Authors:  Bradford Z Mahon; Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.