Literature DB >> 20619347

How specifically are action verbs represented in the neural motor system: an fMRI study.

Wessel O van Dam1, Shirley-Ann Rueschemeyer, Harold Bekkering.   

Abstract

Embodied accounts of language processing suggest that sensorimotor areas, generally dedicated to perception and action, are also involved in the processing and representation of word meaning. Support for such accounts comes from studies showing that language about actions selectively modulates the execution of congruent and incongruent motor responses (e.g., Glenberg & Kaschak, 2002), and from functional neuroimaging studies showing that understanding action-related language recruits sensorimotor brain areas (e.g. Hauk, Johnsrude, & Pulvermueller, 2004). In the current experiment we explored the basis of the neural motor system's involvement in representing words denoting actions. Specifically, we investigated whether the motor system's involvement is modulated by the specificity of the kinematics associated with a word. Previous research in the visual domain indicates that words denoting basic level category members lacking a specific form (e.g., bird) are less richly encoded within visual areas than words denoting subordinate level members (e.g., pelican), for which the visual form is better specified (Gauthier, Anderson, Tarr, Skudlarski, & Gore, 1997). In the present study we extend these findings to the motor domain. Modulation of the BOLD response elicited by verbs denoting a general motor program (e.g., to clean) was compared to modulation elicited by verbs denoting a more specific motor program (e.g., to wipe). Conform with our hypothesis, a region within the bilateral inferior parietal lobule, typically serving the representation of action plans and goals, was sensitive to the specificity of motor programs associated with the action verbs. These findings contribute to the growing body of research on embodied language representations by showing that the concreteness of an action-semantic feature is reflected in the neural response to action verbs.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20619347     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.071

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  25 in total

1.  Flexibility in embodied lexical-semantic representations.

Authors:  Wessel O van Dam; Margriet van Dijk; Harold Bekkering; Shirley-Ann Rueschemeyer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Passive reading and motor imagery about hand actions and tool-use actions: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Jie Yang; Hua Shu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effects of motion speed in action representations.

Authors:  Wessel O van Dam; Laura J Speed; Vicky T Lai; Gabriella Vigliocco; Rutvik H Desai
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  From mind to matter: neural correlates of abstract and concrete mindsets.

Authors:  Michael Gilead; Nira Liberman; Anat Maril
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.436

5.  Neuronal interactions between mentalising and action systems during indirect request processing.

Authors:  Markus J van Ackeren; Areti Smaragdi; Shirley-Ann Rueschemeyer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  At the mercy of strategies: the role of motor representations in language understanding.

Authors:  Barbara Tomasino; Raffaella Ida Rumiati
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-04

7.  The non-stop road from concrete to abstract: high concreteness causes the activation of long-range networks.

Authors:  Sabine Weiss; Horst M Müller
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Clustering the lexicon in the brain: a meta-analysis of the neurofunctional evidence on noun and verb processing.

Authors:  Davide Crepaldi; Manuela Berlingeri; Isabella Cattinelli; Nunzio A Borghese; Claudio Luzzatti; Eraldo Paulesu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Grasp it loudly! Supporting actions with semantically congruent spoken action words.

Authors:  Raphaël Fargier; Mathilde Ménoret; Véronique Boulenger; Tatjana A Nazir; Yves Paulignan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Flexibility in embodied language understanding.

Authors:  Roel M Willems; Daniel Casasanto
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-06-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.