Literature DB >> 21976367

Effect of denosumab treatment on the risk of fractures in subgroups of women with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Michael R McClung1, Steven Boonen, Ove Törring, Christian Roux, René Rizzoli, Henry G Bone, Claude-Laurent Benhamou, Willem F Lems, Salvatore Minisola, Johan Halse, Hans C Hoeck, Richard Eastell, Andrea Wang, Suresh Siddhanti, Steven R Cummings.   

Abstract

Denosumab reduces the risk of new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. Previous trials suggest that the efficacy of antiresorptives on fractures might differ by patients' characteristics, such as age, bone mineral density (BMD), and fracture history. In the FREEDOM study, 7808 women aged 60 to 90 years with osteoporosis were randomly assigned to receive subcutaneous injections of denosumab (60 mg) or placebo every 6 months for 3 years. New vertebral and nonvertebral fractures were radiologically confirmed. Subgroup analyses described in this article were prospectively planned before study unblinding to evaluate the effect of denosumab on new vertebral and nonvertebral fractures across various subgroups. Compared with placebo, denosumab decreased the risk of new vertebral fractures in the overall study population over 3 years. This effect did not significantly differ for any of the nine subgroups analyzed (p > 0.09 for all potential interactions). Denosumab also reduced all nonvertebral fractures by 20% in the full study cohort over 3 years. This risk reduction was statistically significant in women with a baseline femoral neck BMD T-score ≤ -2.5 but not in those with a T-score > -2.5; in those with a body mass index (BMI) < 25 kg/m(2) but not ≥ 25 kg/m(2); and in those without but not with a prevalent vertebral fracture. These differential treatment effects were not explained by differences in BMD responses to denosumab. Denosumab 60 mg administered every 6 months for 3 years in women with osteoporosis reduced the risk of new vertebral fractures to a similar degree in all subgroups. The effect of denosumab on nonvertebral fracture risk differed by femoral neck BMD, BMI, and prevalent vertebral fracture at baseline.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21976367     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  42 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy of antiresorptive agents for preventing fractures in Japanese patients with an increased fracture risk: review of the literature.

Authors:  Jun Iwamoto; Yoshihiro Sato; Tsuyoshi Takeda; Hideo Matsumoto
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  Modelling the cost effectiveness of interventions for osteoporosis: issues to consider.

Authors:  Matt D Stevenson; Peter L Selby
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  [Therapy of bone marrow edema syndrome in the knee with denosumab. Case report].

Authors:  T Geith; W Mutschler; F Berger
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 4.  Denosumab: A Review in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.

Authors:  Emma D Deeks
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  Bone metabolism after bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Elaine W Yu
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Denosumab significantly increases bone mineral density and reduces bone turnover compared with monthly oral ibandronate and risedronate in postmenopausal women who remained at higher risk for fracture despite previous suboptimal treatment with an oral bisphosphonate.

Authors:  J P Brown; C Roux; P R Ho; M A Bolognese; J Hall; H G Bone; S Bonnick; J P van den Bergh; I Ferreira; P Dakin; R B Wagman; C Recknor
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Fracture risk assessment: state of the art, methodologically unsound, or poorly reported?

Authors:  Gary S Collins; Karl Michaëlsson
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 8.  Denosumab: a review of its use in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Lesley J Scott
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  Treatment of Osteoporosis in Australian Residential Aged Care Facilities: Update on Consensus Recommendations for Fracture Prevention.

Authors:  Gustavo Duque; Stephen R Lord; Jenson Mak; Kirtan Ganda; Jacqueline J T Close; Peter Ebeling; Alexandra Papaioannou; Charles A Inderjeeth
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 4.669

Review 10.  Obesity and bone.

Authors:  Juliet Compston
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.