BACKGROUND: With substantial morbidity and functional impairment, older patients receiving home health care are especially susceptible to the adverse effects of unsafe or ineffective medications. Home health agencies’ medication review and reconciliation services, however, provide an added mechanism of medication safety that could offset this risk. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) among current elderly home health patients in the US. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis using data from the 2007 National Home and Hospice Care Survey. SUBJECTS: 3,124 home health patients 65 years of age or older on at least one medication. MAIN MEASURES: Prevalence and classification of PIM use and the association between PIM use and patient and home health agency characteristics.Key Results In 2007, 38% (95% CI: 36-41) of elderly home health patients were taking at least one PIM. Polypharmacy was associated with an increased risk of PIM use; admission to home health care from a nursing home or other sub-acute facility (compared to admission from the community) and a payment source other than Medicare or Medicaid were associated with a decreased risk of PIM use. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of PIM use in older home health patients is high despite potential mechanisms for improved safety. Policies to improve the review and reconciliation processes within home health agencies and to improve physician-home health clinician collaboration are likely needed to lower the prevalence of PIM use in older home health patients.
BACKGROUND: With substantial morbidity and functional impairment, older patients receiving home health care are especially susceptible to the adverse effects of unsafe or ineffective medications. Home health agencies’ medication review and reconciliation services, however, provide an added mechanism of medication safety that could offset this risk. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) among current elderly home health patients in the US. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis using data from the 2007 National Home and Hospice Care Survey. SUBJECTS: 3,124 home health patients 65 years of age or older on at least one medication. MAIN MEASURES: Prevalence and classification of PIM use and the association between PIM use and patient and home health agency characteristics.Key Results In 2007, 38% (95% CI: 36-41) of elderly home health patients were taking at least one PIM. Polypharmacy was associated with an increased risk of PIM use; admission to home health care from a nursing home or other sub-acute facility (compared to admission from the community) and a payment source other than Medicare or Medicaid were associated with a decreased risk of PIM use. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of PIM use in older home health patients is high despite potential mechanisms for improved safety. Policies to improve the review and reconciliation processes within home health agencies and to improve physician-home health clinician collaboration are likely needed to lower the prevalence of PIM use in older home health patients.
Authors: William J Meurer; Tommy A Potti; Kevin A Kerber; Comilla Sasson; Michelle L Macy; Brady T West; Eve D Losman Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Tim Johansson; Muna E Abuzahra; Sophie Keller; Eva Mann; Barbara Faller; Christina Sommerauer; Jennifer Höck; Christin Löffler; Anna Köchling; Jochen Schuler; Maria Flamm; Andreas Sönnichsen Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2016-05-07 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Matthew C Lohman; Brandi P Cotton; Alexandra B Zagaria; Yuhua Bao; Rebecca L Greenberg; Karen L Fortuna; Martha L Bruce Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-08-28 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Amy J Davidoff; G Edward Miller; Eric M Sarpong; Eunice Yang; Nicole Brandt; Donna M Fick Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2015-03-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Brandi P Cotton; Matthew C Lohman; Jessica M Brooks; Karen L Whiteman; Yuhua Bao; Rebecca L Greenberg; Martha L Bruce Journal: Home Healthc Now Date: 2017-06
Authors: David P O'Sullivan; Denis O'Mahony; Carole Parsons; Carmel Hughes; Kevin Murphy; Susan Patterson; Stephen Byrne Journal: Drugs Aging Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 3.923