Literature DB >> 21974937

Survival and death signals can predict tumor response to therapy after oncogene inactivation.

Phuoc T Tran1, Pavan K Bendapudi, H Jill Lin, Peter Choi, Shan Koh, Joy Chen, George Horng, Nicholas P Hughes, Lawrence H Schwartz, Vincent A Miller, Toshiyuki Kawashima, Toshio Kitamura, David Paik, Dean W Felsher.   

Abstract

Cancers can exhibit marked tumor regression after oncogene inhibition through a phenomenon called "oncogene addiction." The ability to predict when a tumor will exhibit oncogene addiction would be useful in the development of targeted therapeutics. Oncogene addiction is likely the consequence of many cellular programs. However, we reasoned that many of these inputs may converge on aggregate survival and death signals. To test this, we examined conditional transgenic models of K-ras(G12D)--or MYC-induced lung tumors and lymphoma combined with quantitative imaging and an in situ analysis of biomarkers of proliferation and apoptotic signaling. We then used computational modeling based on ordinary differential equations (ODEs) to show that oncogene addiction could be modeled as differential changes in survival and death intracellular signals. Our mathematical model could be generalized to different imaging methods (computed tomography and bioluminescence imaging), different oncogenes (K-ras(G12D) and MYC), and several tumor types (lung and lymphoma). Our ODE model could predict the differential dynamics of several putative prosurvival and prodeath signaling factors [phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2, Akt1, Stat3/5 (signal transducer and activator of transcription 3/5), and p38] that contribute to the aggregate survival and death signals after oncogene inactivation. Furthermore, we could predict the influence of specific genetic lesions (p53⁻/⁻, Stat3-d358L, and myr-Akt1) on tumor regression after oncogene inactivation. Then, using machine learning based on support vector machine, we applied quantitative imaging methods to human patients to predict both their EGFR genotype and their progression-free survival after treatment with the targeted therapeutic erlotinib. Hence, the consequences of oncogene inactivation can be accurately modeled on the basis of a relatively small number of parameters that may predict when targeted therapeutics will elicit oncogene addiction after oncogene inactivation and hence tumor regression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21974937      PMCID: PMC3966995          DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Transl Med        ISSN: 1946-6234            Impact factor:   17.956


  63 in total

1.  MYC Inactivation Elicits Oncogene Addiction through Both Tumor Cell-Intrinsic and Host-Dependent Mechanisms.

Authors:  Dean W Felsher
Journal:  Genes Cancer       Date:  2010-06

2.  Five-year lung cancer screening experience: CT appearance, growth rate, location, and histologic features of 61 lung cancers.

Authors:  Rebecca M Lindell; Thomas E Hartman; Stephen J Swensen; James R Jett; David E Midthun; Henry D Tazelaar; Jayawant N Mandrekar
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Hyperactive Ras in developmental disorders and cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne Schubbert; Kevin Shannon; Gideon Bollag
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  Reversible tumorigenesis by MYC in hematopoietic lineages.

Authors:  D W Felsher; J M Bishop
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 5.  Molecular predictors of response to epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists in non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Lecia V Sequist; Daphne W Bell; Thomas J Lynch; Daniel A Haber
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-02-10       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Overdiagnosis in chest radiographic screening for lung carcinoma: frequency.

Authors:  David F Yankelevitz; William J Kostis; Claudia I Henschke; Robert T Heelan; Daniel M Libby; Mark W Pasmantier; James P Smith
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose to predict the pathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy.

Authors:  I C Smith; A E Welch; A W Hutcheon; I D Miller; S Payne; F Chilcott; S Waikar; T Whitaker; A K Ah-See; O Eremin; S D Heys; F J Gilbert; P F Sharp
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Time course of early response to chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Authors:  Claude Nahmias; Wahid T Hanna; Lindi M Wahl; Misty J Long; Karl F Hubner; David W Townsend
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  A pilot study of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scans during and after radiation-based therapy in patients with non small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Feng-Ming Spring Kong; Kirk A Frey; Leslie E Quint; Randall K Ten Haken; James A Hayman; Marc Kessler; Indrin J Chetty; Daniel Normolle; Avraham Eisbruch; Theodore S Lawrence
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Accelerated regrowth of non-small-cell lung tumours after induction chemotherapy.

Authors:  S Y El Sharouni; H B Kal; J J Battermann
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  24 in total

1.  Targeted therapies: model reveals addiction to oncogenes.

Authors:  Rebecca Kirk
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Tumor dormancy, oncogene addiction, cellular senescence, and self-renewal programs.

Authors:  David I Bellovin; Bikul Das; Dean W Felsher
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Coupling an EML4-ALK-centric interactome with RNA interference identifies sensitizers to ALK inhibitors.

Authors:  Guolin Zhang; Hannah Scarborough; Jihye Kim; Andrii I Rozhok; Yian Ann Chen; Xiaohui Zhang; Lanxi Song; Yun Bai; Bin Fang; Richard Z Liu; John Koomen; Aik Choon Tan; James Degregori; Eric B Haura
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 8.192

4.  The Myc and Ras Partnership in Cancer: Indistinguishable Alliance or Contextual Relationship?

Authors:  Wadie D Mahauad-Fernandez; Dean W Felsher
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  MYC activation is a hallmark of cancer initiation and maintenance.

Authors:  Meital Gabay; Yulin Li; Dean W Felsher
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 6.915

6.  STK38 is a critical upstream regulator of MYC's oncogenic activity in human B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  B C Bisikirska; S J Adam; M J Alvarez; P Rajbhandari; R Cox; C Lefebvre; K Wang; G E Rieckhof; D W Felsher; A Califano
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 7.  Noncanonical roles of the immune system in eliciting oncogene addiction.

Authors:  Stephanie C Casey; David I Bellovin; Dean W Felsher
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 7.486

Review 8.  Inactivation of MYC reverses tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Y Li; S C Casey; D W Felsher
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 9.  A census of pathway maps in cancer systems biology.

Authors:  Brent M Kuenzi; Trey Ideker
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  A First-in-Class TWIST1 Inhibitor with Activity in Oncogene-Driven Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Zachary A Yochum; Jessica Cades; Lucia Mazzacurati; Neil M Neumann; Susheel K Khetarpal; Suman Chatterjee; Hailun Wang; Myriam A Attar; Eric H-B Huang; Sarah N Chatley; Katriana Nugent; Ashwin Somasundaram; Johnathan A Engh; Andrew J Ewald; Yoon-Jae Cho; Charles M Rudin; Phuoc T Tran; Timothy F Burns
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 5.852

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.