Literature DB >> 23143977

Tumor dormancy, oncogene addiction, cellular senescence, and self-renewal programs.

David I Bellovin1, Bikul Das, Dean W Felsher.   

Abstract

Cancers are frequently addicted to initiating oncogenes that elicit aberrant cellular proliferation, self-renewal, and apoptosis. Restoration of oncogenes to normal physiologic regulation can elicit dramatic reversal of the neoplastic phenotype, including reduced proliferation and increased apoptosis of tumor cells (Science 297(5578):63-64, 2002). In some cases, oncogene inactivation is associated with compete elimination of a tumor. However, in other cases, oncogene inactivation induces a conversion of tumor cells to a dormant state that is associated with cellular differentiation and/or loss of the ability to self-replicate. Importantly, this dormant state is reversible, with tumor cells regaining the ability to self-renew upon oncogene reactivation. Thus, understanding the mechanism of oncogene inactivation-induced dormancy may be crucial for predicting therapeutic outcome of targeted therapy. One important mechanistic insight into tumor dormancy is that oncogene addiction might involve regulation of a decision between self-renewal and cellular senescence. Recent evidence suggests that this decision is regulated by multiple mechanisms that include tumor cell-intrinsic, cell-autonomous mechanisms and host-dependent, tumor cell-non-autonomous programs (Mol Cell 4(2):199-207, 1999; Science 297(5578):102-104, 2002; Nature 431(7012):1112-1117, 2004; Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104(32):13028-13033, 2007). In particular, the tumor microenvironment, which is known to be critical during tumor initiation (Cancer Cell 7(5):411-423, 2005; J Clin Invest 121(6):2436-2446, 2011), prevention (Nature 410(6832):1107-1111, 2001), and progression (Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 21(1):3-10, 2010), also appears to dictate when oncogene inactivation elicits the permanent loss of self-renewal through induction of cellular senescence (Nat Rev Clin Oncol 8(3):151-160, 2011; Science 313(5795):1960-1964, 2006; N Engl J Med 351(21):2159-21569, 2004). Thus, oncogene addiction may be best modeled as a consequence of the interplay amongst cell-autonomous and host-dependent programs that define when a therapy will result in tumor dormancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23143977      PMCID: PMC3773491          DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-1445-2_6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol        ISSN: 0065-2598            Impact factor:   2.622


  128 in total

Review 1.  Cancer immunoediting: from immunosurveillance to tumor escape.

Authors:  Gavin P Dunn; Allen T Bruce; Hiroaki Ikeda; Lloyd J Old; Robert D Schreiber
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 25.606

Review 2.  Cancer stem cells: lessons from leukemia.

Authors:  Jean C Y Wang; John E Dick
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 20.808

3.  A senescence-like phenotype distinguishes tumor cells that undergo terminal proliferation arrest after exposure to anticancer agents.

Authors:  B D Chang; E V Broude; M Dokmanovic; H Zhu; A Ruth; Y Xuan; E S Kandel; E Lausch; K Christov; I B Roninson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Oncogenic ras provokes premature cell senescence associated with accumulation of p53 and p16INK4a.

Authors:  M Serrano; A W Lin; M E McCurrach; D Beach; S W Lowe
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-03-07       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Characterizing the protective component of the alphabeta T cell response to transplantable squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Michael Girardi; David Oppenheim; Earl J Glusac; Renata Filler; Allan Balmain; Robert E Tigelaar; Adrian C Hayday
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 8.551

6.  Senescence-like growth arrest induced by hydrogen peroxide in human diploid fibroblast F65 cells.

Authors:  Q Chen; B N Ames
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-05-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Increased intensity lymphodepletion enhances tumor treatment efficacy of adoptively transferred tumor-specific T cells.

Authors:  Claudia Wrzesinski; Chrystal M Paulos; Andrew Kaiser; Pawel Muranski; Douglas C Palmer; Luca Gattinoni; Zhiya Yu; Steven A Rosenberg; Nicholas P Restifo
Journal:  J Immunother       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.456

Review 8.  Adoptive immunotherapy of cancer using CD4(+) T cells.

Authors:  Pawel Muranski; Nicholas P Restifo
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 7.486

Review 9.  Reversing cancer from inside and out: oncogene addiction, cellular senescence, and the angiogenic switch.

Authors:  Dean W Felsher
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.589

10.  Pten and p53 converge on c-Myc to control differentiation, self-renewal, and transformation of normal and neoplastic stem cells in glioblastoma.

Authors:  H Zheng; H Ying; H Yan; A C Kimmelman; D J Hiller; A-J Chen; S R Perry; G Tonon; G C Chu; Z Ding; J M Stommel; K L Dunn; R Wiedemeyer; M J You; C Brennan; Y A Wang; K L Ligon; W H Wong; L Chin; R A dePinho
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2009-01-15
View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  An essential role for the immune system in the mechanism of tumor regression following targeted oncogene inactivation.

Authors:  Stephanie C Casey; Yulin Li; Dean W Felsher
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.829

2.  An Epigenetic Pathway Regulates Sensitivity of Breast Cancer Cells to HER2 Inhibition via FOXO/c-Myc Axis.

Authors:  Smita Matkar; Paras Sharma; Shubin Gao; Buddha Gurung; Bryson W Katona; Jennifer Liao; Abdul Bari Muhammad; Xiang-Cheng Kong; Lei Wang; Guanghui Jin; Chi V Dang; Xianxin Hua
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 31.743

Review 3.  The other side of the coin: the tumor-suppressive aspect of oncogenes and the oncogenic aspect of tumor-suppressive genes, such as those along the CCND-CDK4/6-RB axis.

Authors:  Xiaomin Lou; Ju Zhang; Siqi Liu; Ningzhi Xu; D Joshua Liao
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Identification of Genes Regulating Breast Cancer Dormancy in 3D Bone Endosteal Niche Cultures.

Authors:  Julie McGrath; Louis Panzica; Ryan Ransom; Henry G Withers; Irwin H Gelman
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 5.  Noncanonical roles of the immune system in eliciting oncogene addiction.

Authors:  Stephanie C Casey; David I Bellovin; Dean W Felsher
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 7.486

6.  MYC Regulates the HIF2α Stemness Pathway via Nanog and Sox2 to Maintain Self-Renewal in Cancer Stem Cells versus Non-Stem Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Bikul Das; Bidisha Pal; Rashmi Bhuyan; Hong Li; Anupam Sarma; Sukanya Gayan; Joyeeta Talukdar; Sorra Sandhya; Seema Bhuyan; Gayatri Gogoi; Arvin M Gouw; Debabrat Baishya; Jason R Gotlib; Amal C Kataki; Dean W Felsher
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 7.  Targeting survivin in cancer: novel drug development approaches.

Authors:  Bernd Groner; Astrid Weiss
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.807

8.  Just like the rest of evolution in Mother Nature, the evolution of cancers may be driven by natural selection, and not by haphazard mutations.

Authors:  Ju Zhang; Xiaomin Lou; Lucas Zellmer; Siqi Liu; Ningzhi Xu; D Joshua Liao
Journal:  Oncoscience       Date:  2014-09-22

Review 9.  Macroautophagy and the oncogene-induced senescence.

Authors:  Daniel Grasso; Maria I Vaccaro
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 5.555

10.  Apc Restoration Promotes Cellular Differentiation and Reestablishes Crypt Homeostasis in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Lukas E Dow; Kevin P O'Rourke; Janelle Simon; Darjus F Tschaharganeh; Johan H van Es; Hans Clevers; Scott W Lowe
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 41.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.