Literature DB >> 21973094

A closer look at the effect of preliminary goodness-of-fit testing for normality for the one-sample t-test.

Justine Rochon1, Meinhard Kieser.   

Abstract

Student's one-sample t-test is a commonly used method when inference about the population mean is made. As advocated in textbooks and articles, the assumption of normality is often checked by a preliminary goodness-of-fit (GOF) test. In a paper recently published by Schucany and Ng it was shown that, for the uniform distribution, screening of samples by a pretest for normality leads to a more conservative conditional Type I error rate than application of the one-sample t-test without preliminary GOF test. In contrast, for the exponential distribution, the conditional level is even more elevated than the Type I error rate of the t-test without pretest. We examine the reasons behind these characteristics. In a simulation study, samples drawn from the exponential, lognormal, uniform, Student's t-distribution with 2 degrees of freedom (t(2) ) and the standard normal distribution that had passed normality screening, as well as the ingredients of the test statistics calculated from these samples, are investigated. For non-normal distributions, we found that preliminary testing for normality may change the distribution of means and standard deviations of the selected samples as well as the correlation between them (if the underlying distribution is non-symmetric), thus leading to altered distributions of the resulting test statistics. It is shown that for skewed distributions the excess in Type I error rate may be even more pronounced when testing one-sided hypotheses. ©2010 The British Psychological Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21973094     DOI: 10.1348/2044-8317.002003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1102            Impact factor:   3.380


  6 in total

1.  [Influence of corneal pachymetric changes on functional results after cataract surgery].

Authors:  F N Auerbach; M P Holzer; G U Auffarth; R Khoramnia; B C Thomas; D Saure; T M Rabsilber
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Prevalence of Opioid Dependence and Opioid Agonist Treatment in the Berlin Custodial Setting: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Kira von Bernuth; Peter Seidel; Julia Krebs; Marc Lehmann; Britta Neumann; Norbert Konrad; Annette Opitz-Welke
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-08-12       Impact factor: 4.157

3.  To test or not to test: Preliminary assessment of normality when comparing two independent samples.

Authors:  Justine Rochon; Matthias Gondan; Meinhard Kieser
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Are assumptions of well-known statistical techniques checked, and why (not)?

Authors:  Rink Hoekstra; Henk A L Kiers; Addie Johnson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-05-14

5.  Statistical conclusion validity: some common threats and simple remedies.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-29

6.  scGET: Predicting Cell Fate Transition During Early Embryonic Development by Single-cell Graph Entropy.

Authors:  Jiayuan Zhong; Chongyin Han; Xuhang Zhang; Pei Chen; Rui Liu
Journal:  Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 7.691

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.