INTRODUCTION: Abdominal imaging is often performed after pancreatic cancer resection. We attempted to quantify the volume and estimate the cost of complex imaging after pancreatectomy nationwide, and to determine whether their frequent use confers benefit. METHODS: Patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent resection were identified in Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare (1991-2005). Claims for abdominal imaging ≤5 years after resection were analyzed. Patients receiving annual CT scans were identified. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. To assess frequency of annual CT scanning in patients with superior survival, the top decile was further analyzed. RESULTS: Eleven thousand eight hundred fifty studies were performed on 2,217 patients. Ten thousand five hundred forty-two (89%) were CT scans. The median number of scans doubled from three in 1991 to six in 2005 (p < 0.0001). Among patients with sufficient survival to allow for analysis, 51.3% received annual CT scans, while only 32.4% of top-performing patients received annual scans. Univariate analysis of the 10% of patients with superior survival did not reveal any significant benefit associated with annual imaging. CONCLUSION: Utilization of complex imaging after pancreatic cancer resection has increased substantially among Medicare beneficiaries, driven primarily by an increasing number of CT scans. Our study demonstrated no significant survival benefit among patients who received scans on a routine basis.
INTRODUCTION: Abdominal imaging is often performed after pancreatic cancer resection. We attempted to quantify the volume and estimate the cost of complex imaging after pancreatectomy nationwide, and to determine whether their frequent use confers benefit. METHODS:Patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent resection were identified in Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare (1991-2005). Claims for abdominal imaging ≤5 years after resection were analyzed. Patients receiving annual CT scans were identified. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. To assess frequency of annual CT scanning in patients with superior survival, the top decile was further analyzed. RESULTS: Eleven thousand eight hundred fifty studies were performed on 2,217 patients. Ten thousand five hundred forty-two (89%) were CT scans. The median number of scans doubled from three in 1991 to six in 2005 (p < 0.0001). Among patients with sufficient survival to allow for analysis, 51.3% received annual CT scans, while only 32.4% of top-performing patients received annual scans. Univariate analysis of the 10% of patients with superior survival did not reveal any significant benefit associated with annual imaging. CONCLUSION: Utilization of complex imaging after pancreatic cancer resection has increased substantially among Medicare beneficiaries, driven primarily by an increasing number of CT scans. Our study demonstrated no significant survival benefit among patients who received scans on a routine basis.
Authors: James Edward Carroll; Jillian K Smith; Jessica P Simons; Melissa M Murphy; Sing Chau Ng; Shimul A Shah; Zheng Zhou; Jennifer F Tseng Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2010-09-16 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Taylor S Riall; William H Nealon; James S Goodwin; Dong Zhang; Yong-Fang Kuo; Courtney M Townsend; Jean L Freeman Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Jessica P Simons; Sing Chau Ng; Theodore P McDade; Zheng Zhou; Craig C Earle; Jennifer F Tseng Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-04-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Michaela A Dinan; Lesley H Curtis; Bradley G Hammill; Edward F Patz; Amy P Abernethy; Alisa M Shea; Kevin A Schulman Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-04-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Karl Y Bilimoria; David J Bentrem; Clifford Y Ko; Andrew K Stewart; David P Winchester; Mark S Talamonti Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Jessica P Simons; Shimul A Shah; Sing Chau Ng; Giles F Whalen; Jennifer F Tseng Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2009-06-09 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Thomas Schnelldorfer; Adam L Ware; Michael G Sarr; Thomas C Smyrk; Lizhi Zhang; Rui Qin; Rachel E Gullerud; John H Donohue; David M Nagorney; Michael B Farnell Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Joan L Warren; Linda C Harlan; Angela Fahey; Beth A Virnig; Jean L Freeman; Carrie N Klabunde; Gregory S Cooper; Kevin B Knopf Journal: Med Care Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Alexsander K Bressan; Jean-Francois Ouellet; Divine Tanyingoh; Elijah Dixon; Gilaad G Kaplan; Sean C Grondin; Robert P Myers; Rachid Mohamed; Chad G Ball Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: David L Chan; Matthew Cheung; Craig C Earle; Natalie Coburn; Nicole Mittmann; Farah Rahman; Ning Liu; Simron Singh Journal: J Gastrointest Cancer Date: 2020-03
Authors: Omar Hyder; Rebecca M Dodson; Skye C Mayo; Eric B Schneider; Matthew J Weiss; Joseph M Herman; Christopher L Wolfgang; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: Surgery Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Raymond G Deobald; Eva S W Cheng; Yoo-Joung Ko; Frances C Wright; Paul J Karanicolas Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2014-12-24 Impact factor: 3.647
Authors: Omar Hyder; Rebecca M Dodson; Matthew Weiss; David P Cosgrove; Joseph M Herman; Jean-Francois H Geschwind; Ihab R Kamel; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: J Gastrointest Surg Date: 2013-08-14 Impact factor: 3.452
Authors: Selina K Wong; Lovedeep Gondara; Daniel J Renouf; Howard J Lim; Jonathan M Loree; Janine M Davies; Sharlene Gill Journal: J Gastrointest Oncol Date: 2021-04