OBJECTIVE: This study examined the effects of treadmill training with optic flow on the functional recovery of balance and gait in stroke patients. DESIGN: Randomized controlled experimental study. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty patients following stroke were divided randomly into the treadmill with optic flow group (n = 10), treadmill group (n = 10) and control group (n = 10). INTERVENTIONS: The subjects in the experimental group wore a head-mounted display to receive speed-modulated optic flow during treadmill training for 30 minutes, while those in the treadmill group and control group received treadmill training and regular therapy for the same time, three times a week for four weeks. MAIN MEASURES: The data were collected using timed up-and-go test, functional reach test, 10-m walk test, and six-minute walk test before and after treatment. RESULTS: The timed up-and-go test in the treadmill with optic flow group (5.55 ± 2.04) improved significantly greater than the treadmill (1.50 ± 0.93) and control (0.40 ± 0.84) groups. The functional reach test in the treadmill with optic flow group (2.78 ± 1.44) was significantly higher than the control group (0.20 ± 0.16) only. The gait velocity in the treadmill with optic flow group (0.21 ± 0.06) showed a significant decrease compared to the treadmill (0.03 ± 0.02) and control (0.01 ± 0.02) groups. Finally, the six-minute walk test in the treadmill with optic flow group (24.49 ± 11.00) showed significant improvement compared to the treadmill training (4.65 ± 3.25) and control (1.79 ± 3.08) groups. CONCLUSION:Treadmill using optic flow speed modulation improves the balance and gait significantly in patients with stroke who are able to participate in physical gait training.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: This study examined the effects of treadmill training with optic flow on the functional recovery of balance and gait in strokepatients. DESIGN: Randomized controlled experimental study. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty patients following stroke were divided randomly into the treadmill with optic flow group (n = 10), treadmill group (n = 10) and control group (n = 10). INTERVENTIONS: The subjects in the experimental group wore a head-mounted display to receive speed-modulated optic flow during treadmill training for 30 minutes, while those in the treadmill group and control group received treadmill training and regular therapy for the same time, three times a week for four weeks. MAIN MEASURES: The data were collected using timed up-and-go test, functional reach test, 10-m walk test, and six-minute walk test before and after treatment. RESULTS: The timed up-and-go test in the treadmill with optic flow group (5.55 ± 2.04) improved significantly greater than the treadmill (1.50 ± 0.93) and control (0.40 ± 0.84) groups. The functional reach test in the treadmill with optic flow group (2.78 ± 1.44) was significantly higher than the control group (0.20 ± 0.16) only. The gait velocity in the treadmill with optic flow group (0.21 ± 0.06) showed a significant decrease compared to the treadmill (0.03 ± 0.02) and control (0.01 ± 0.02) groups. Finally, the six-minute walk test in the treadmill with optic flow group (24.49 ± 11.00) showed significant improvement compared to the treadmill training (4.65 ± 3.25) and control (1.79 ± 3.08) groups. CONCLUSION: Treadmill using optic flow speed modulation improves the balance and gait significantly in patients with stroke who are able to participate in physical gait training.
Authors: David H Saunders; Mark Sanderson; Sara Hayes; Maeve Kilrane; Carolyn A Greig; Miriam Brazzelli; Gillian E Mead Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-03-24
Authors: Juliana M Rodrigues-Baroni; Lucas R Nascimento; Louise Ada; Luci F Teixeira-Salmela Journal: Braz J Phys Ther Date: 2014 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.377
Authors: Jean-François Nankoo; Christopher R Madan; Omar Medina; Tyler Makepeace; Christopher L Striemer Journal: Cerebellum Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 3.847
Authors: José Antonio Merchán-Baeza; Manuel González-Sánchez; Antonio Ignacio Cuesta-Vargas Journal: Biomed Eng Online Date: 2015-05-30 Impact factor: 2.819
Authors: Kristen L Hollands; Trudy A Pelton; Andrew Wimperis; Diane Whitham; Wei Tan; Sue Jowett; Catherine M Sackley; Alan M Wing; Sarah F Tyson; Jonathan Mathias; Marianne Hensman; Paulette M van Vliet Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-10-07 Impact factor: 3.240