Literature DB >> 21971718

Comparison of tone burst versus logon stimulation for vestibular evoked myogenic potentials.

Ali Ozdek1, Omer Bayır, Emel Cadallı Tatar, Mehmet Hakan Korkmaz.   

Abstract

The following study has been carried out to compare the effectiveness of logon and tone burst acoustic stimulation to elicit vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) responses. The methods and the subjects include 31 healthy adult volunteers (62 ears) who were enrolled in this study. Two different acoustic stimuli, logon (L-VEMP) and tone burst (T-VEMP), were used to elicit VEMP responses in each subject. Bilateral recordings with simultaneous binaural acoustic stimulations were used during VEMP recordings. During the recording period, the subjects were in supine position with their head elevated. The results observed were that the response rate of p1n1 wave was 91.9% for L-VEMP and 88.7% for T-VEMP. The response rate of n2p2 wave was 80.6% for L-VEMP, and 75.8% for T-VEMP. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to the latencies of p1, n1, n2 and p2, p1n1 and n2p2 interval, and p1n1 and n2p2 amplitude. The conclusion was that there was no difference between logon and tone burst stimulation with respect to VEMP response rates and VEMP parameters. Therefore, they are not superior to each other.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21971718     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-011-1783-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  21 in total

1.  Earlier and later components of tone burst evoked myogenic potentials.

Authors:  Chi-Te Wang; Yi-Ho Young
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Eliciting constant and prominent waves n34-p44 of vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials.

Authors:  Tsung-Wei Huang; Yi-Ho Young; Po-Wen Cheng
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.494

Review 3.  Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: history and overview.

Authors:  Guangwei Zhou; L Clarke Cox
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.493

4.  Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in children.

Authors:  Pasqualina M Picciotti; Antonella Fiorita; Walter Di Nardo; Lea Calò; Emanuele Scarano; Gaetano Paludetti
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 1.675

5.  Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in middle ear effusion.

Authors:  Mao-Che Wang; Guo-She Lee
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.494

Review 6.  Principles of electric response audiometry.

Authors:  H Davis
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1976 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Myogenic potentials generated by a click-evoked vestibulocollic reflex.

Authors:  J G Colebatch; G M Halmagyi; N F Skuse
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  The effect of sternocleidomastoid electrode location on vestibular evoked myogenic potential.

Authors:  K Sheykholeslami; T Murofushi; K Kaga
Journal:  Auris Nasus Larynx       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.863

9.  Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in chronic otitis media before and after surgery.

Authors:  Mao-Che Wang; Chia-Yu Liu; Eric Chen-Hua Yu; Huei-Jun Wu; Guo-She Lee
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.494

10.  Aging effect on vestibular evoked myogenic potential.

Authors:  Hsuan-Chao Su; Tsung-Wei Huang; Yi-Ho Young; Po-Wen Cheng
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of chirp versus click and tone pip stimulation for cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials.

Authors:  Bo-Chen Wang; Yong Liang; Xiao-Long Liu; Jing Zhao; You-Li Liu; Yan-Fei Li; Wei Zhang; Qi Li
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.503

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.