Literature DB >> 16996145

Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in children.

Pasqualina M Picciotti1, Antonella Fiorita, Walter Di Nardo, Lea Calò, Emanuele Scarano, Gaetano Paludetti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work is to establish if the vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) could be used as a clinical test of vestibular function in children.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty normal hearing children, aged between 3 and 15 years, and classified in preschool and scholar group, have been investigated in order to study normal development of vestibular potentials and to define fundamental parameters of VEMPs, establishing normal data of latencies and amplitude ratio. Electromyographic activity of sternocleidomastoid muscle was recorded while children were laid supine on a bed and asked to raise their head off of the bed in order to activate their neck flexors bilaterally. The saccular receptors were acoustically stimulated with a logon of 500Hz at an intensity of 130dB peSPL presented monaurally through earphones. In each recording, we analysed latencies and amplitudes of the p13 and n23 waves and the amplitude ratio between the two ears.
RESULTS: VEMPs were normally detected in all subjects. In preschool group mean p13 and mean n23 latencies were, respectively, 16.13 (+/-2.12)ms and 21.17 (+/-2.77)ms; mean amplitude ratio was 28.49 (+/-18.10). In scholar group mean p13 and n23 were respectively 16.14 (+/-3.48)ms and 21.78 (+/-3.39)ms, while mean amplitude ratio 20.44 (+/-13.24). Comparison of latencies and amplitude ratio between the children groups and control adult group did not showed any significant differences.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, VEMPs could represent a valid and non-invasive technique able to investigate vestibular function in children and, in particular, vestibulo collic reflex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16996145     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.08.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of tone burst versus logon stimulation for vestibular evoked myogenic potentials.

Authors:  Ali Ozdek; Omer Bayır; Emel Cadallı Tatar; Mehmet Hakan Korkmaz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Air- and bone-conducted vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) in otosclerosis: recordings before and after stapes surgery.

Authors:  M Trivelli; L D'Ascanio; M Pappacena; F Greco; F Salvinelli
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.124

3.  Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in children affected by myelomeningocele.

Authors:  Pasqualina M Picciotti; Antonella Fiorita; Lea Calò; Mariapina Battista; Valentina Paolucci; Emanuele Ausili; Luca Massimi; Claudia Rendeli
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Clinical uses of cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potential testing in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Guangwei Zhou; Jenna Dargie; Briana Dornan; Kenneth Whittemore
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Cervical Vestibular-Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Sedated Toddlers.

Authors:  Ola Abdallah Ibraheem; Mohammad Ramadan Hassaan
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-03-21

Review 6.  Vestibular function in children with cochlear implant: Impact and evaluation.

Authors:  Jianhang Deng; Qianchen Zhu; Kangjia Zhang; Dinghua Xie; Weijing Wu
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 4.086

7.  Saccular function evolution related to cochlear implantation in hearing impaired children.

Authors:  Romică Sebastian Cozma; Maria Cristina Cristina; Mihail Dan Cobzeanu; Raluca Olariu; Oana Roxana Bitere; Cristian Mârţu; Lucia Corina Dima-Cozma; Cristina Gena Dascălu; Mădălina Gabriela Georgescu; Violeta Necula; Luminiţa Mihaela Rădulescu
Journal:  Rom J Morphol Embryol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 1.033

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.