Literature DB >> 21970491

United States Medical Licensing Examination step 1 two-digit score: a correlation with the American Board of Pathology first-time test taker pass/fail rate at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Jennifer Picarsic1, Jay S Raval, Trevor Macpherson.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Factors that correlate with success or failure on the American Board of Pathology (ABP) examination are not known. Other medical residency programs have shown that standardized test scores correlate with specialty board examination scores; however, data from pathology programs are lacking.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the 2-digit score on step 1 of the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) was correlated with ABP examination performance at a large university pathology program.
DESIGN: Nine years of data (2001-2009) from pathology residents (n  =  72) at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) was collected from existing files and deidentified. Step 1 USMLE 2-digit scores and ABP failure rates for first-time test takers were compared. Results are reported as the percentage of residents who failed either the anatomic pathology or clinical pathology part of the ABP examination in cohorts by their USMLE 2-digit score (≤80, 81-85, 86-89, ≥90).
RESULTS: The rolling 5-year (2005-2009) ABP average failure rate for first-time test takers of the anatomic pathology examination was 3.1% (UPMC) and 14.1% (nationally); in clinical pathology, it was 13.8% (UPMC) and 23.6% (nationally). At UPMC, no resident failed the anatomic pathology or clinical pathology parts of the ABP examination if his or her 2-digit USMLE step 1 score was 90 or more across 9 years of training (2001-2009).
CONCLUSIONS: In the UPMC pathology program, 2-digit scores on USMLE step 1 of 90 or more and 80 or less were strong measures of ABP first-time pass/failure rates, whereas scores of 81 to 89 were less-accurate measures. The USMLE step 1 score is one of many criteria that can be used for screening applicants for a pathology residency program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21970491     DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2010-0240-EP

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  6 in total

1.  A compulsory examination in pathology: redundant or necessary?

Authors:  Jan G van den Tweel; Claude Cuvelier; Anthony J Freemont
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2012-07-08       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 2.  Identifying Best Practices for and Utilities of the Pharmacy Curriculum Outcome Assessment Examination.

Authors:  Timothy Y Mok; Frank Romanelli
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-12-25       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Predicting American Board of Emergency Medicine Qualifying Examination Passage Using United States Medical Licensing Examination Step Scores.

Authors:  Terrell Caffery; Jenna Fredette; Mandi W Musso; Glenn N Jones
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2018

4.  Are USMLE Scores Valid Measures for Chief Resident Selection?

Authors:  Elaine R Cohen; Joshua L Goldstein; Clara J Schroedl; Nancy Parlapiano; William C McGaghie; Diane B Wayne
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2020-08

5.  Quality assurance in postgraduate pathology training the Dutch way: regular assessment, monitoring of training programs but no end of training examination.

Authors:  Paul van der Valk
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  USMLE Scores Predict Success in ABEM Initial Certification: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Elie Harmouche; Nikhil Goyal; Ashley Pinawin; Jumana Nagarwala; Rahul Bhat
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-02-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.