Literature DB >> 21970336

Augmented reality visualization during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Tobias Simpfendörfer1, Matthias Baumhauer, Michael Müller, Carsten N Gutt, Hans-Peter Meinzer, Jens J Rassweiler, Selcuk Guven, Dogu Teber.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We present an augmented reality (AR) navigation system that conveys virtual organ models generated from transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) onto a real laparoscopic video during radical prostatectomy. By providing this additional information about the actual anatomy, we can support surgeons in their working decisions. This work reports the system's first in-vivo application.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The system uses custom-developed needles with colored heads that are inserted into the prostate as soon as the organ surface is uncovered. These navigation aids are once segmented in three-dimensional (3D) TRUS data that is acquired right after the placement of the needles and then continuously tracked in the laparoscopic video images by the surgical navigation system. The navigation system traces the navigation aids in real time and computes a registration between TRUS image and laparoscopic video based on the two-dimensional-three dimensional (2D-3D) point correspondences. With this registration, the system correctly superimposes TRUS-based 3D information on an additional AR monitor placed next to the normal laparoscopic screen. Surgical navigation guidance took place until the prostate was removed from the rectal wall. Finally, the navigation aids were removed together with the specimen inside the specimen bag.
RESULTS: The initial human in-vivo application of the surgical navigation system was successful. No complications occurred, the prostate was removed together with the navigation aids, and the system supported the surgeons as intended with an AR visualization in real time. In case of tissue deformations, changes in the spatial configuration of the navigation aids are detected, which preserves the system from erroneous navigation visualization.
CONCLUSIONS: Feasibility of the navigation system was shown in the first in-vivo application. TRUS information could be superimposed via AR in real time. To show the benefit for the patient, results obtained from a larger number of trials are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21970336     DOI: 10.1089/end.2010.0724

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  21 in total

Review 1.  Image-guided robotic interventions for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ashwin N Sridhar; Archie Hughes-Hallett; Erik K Mayer; Philip J Pratt; Philip J Edwards; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara W Darzi; Justin A Vale
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  [Navigation in urological surgery: Possibilities and limits of current techniques].

Authors:  T Simpfendörfer; G Hatiboglu; B A Hadaschik; E Wild; L Maier-Hein; M-C Rassweiler; J Rassweiler; M Hohenfellner; D Teber
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  3D imaging applications for robotic urologic surgery: an ESUT YAUWP review.

Authors:  Enrico Checcucci; Daniele Amparore; Cristian Fiori; Matteo Manfredi; Morra Ivano; Michele Di Dio; Gabriel Niculescu; Federico Piramide; Giovanni Cattaneo; Pietro Piazzolla; Giovanni Enrico Cacciamani; Riccardo Autorino; Francesco Porpiglia
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  [Robotics and intraoperative navigation].

Authors:  D S Schoeb; J Rassweiler; A Sigle; A Miernik; C Engels; A S Goezen; D Teber
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Head-mounted display augmented reality to guide pedicle screw placement utilizing computed tomography.

Authors:  Jacob T Gibby; Samuel A Swenson; Steve Cvetko; Raj Rao; Ramin Javan
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Mobile augmented reality for computer-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Michael Müller; Marie-Claire Rassweiler; Jan Klein; Alexander Seitel; Matthias Gondan; Matthias Baumhauer; Dogu Teber; Jens J Rassweiler; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Lena Maier-Hein
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Navigation system for minimally invasive esophagectomy: experimental study in a porcine model.

Authors:  Felix Nickel; Hannes G Kenngott; Jochen Neuhaus; Christof M Sommer; Tobias Gehrig; Armin Kolb; Matthias Gondan; Boris A Radeleff; Anja Schaible; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Carsten N Gutt; Beat-Peter Müller-Stich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Stereoscopic augmented reality for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Xin Kang; Mahdi Azizian; Emmanuel Wilson; Kyle Wu; Aaron D Martin; Timothy D Kane; Craig A Peters; Kevin Cleary; Raj Shekhar
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Robust augmented reality guidance with fluorescent markers in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Esther Wild; Dogu Teber; Daniel Schmid; Tobias Simpfendörfer; Michael Müller; Ann-Christin Baranski; Hannes Kenngott; Klaus Kopka; Lena Maier-Hein
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 2.924

10.  Construction of a three-dimensional model of renal stones: comprehensive planning for percutaneous nephrolithotomy and assistance in surgery.

Authors:  Hulin Li; Yuanbo Chen; Chunxiao Liu; Bingkun Li; Kai Xu; Susu Bao
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-12-08       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.