Literature DB >> 21969125

Stimulation of the intra-cardiac vagal nerves innervating the AV-node to control ventricular rate during AF: specificity, parameter optimization and chronic use up to 3 months.

Lilian Kornet1, Arne van Hunnik, Koen Michels, Sander Verheule, Alberto Della Scala, Teena West, Roger Kessels, Richard Cornelussen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stimulation of the intra-cardiac vagal nerves innervating the AV-node (AVNS) is a promising approach to slow down ventricular rate (VR) during atrial fibrillation (AF). Our purpose was to demonstrate that effects on R-R-interval during stable AF can be maintained for several months once optimized and that AVNS affects specifically the nerves innervating the AV-node.
METHODS: Our study included both an acute and chronic phase. Fifteen goats were implanted with a pacemaker connected to an atrial and ventricular lead and a neurostimulator connected to an atrial lead placed at a certain septal site, to induce an AV prolongation. In the chronic experiments (n = 9), after assessment of optimal AVNS parameters, the effect of continuous AVNS on VR was studied during stable AF for up to 3 months. The mechanism of AVNS was studied using atropine and esmolol. Next, the effects of AVNS during the atrial refractory period on electrophysiological and hemodynamic parameters were investigated acutely (n = 7).
RESULTS: The maximal effect was found at a stimulation frequency of 40 Hz, and increased with increasing pulse width (at lower voltages) and increasing voltage. After 0, 1, and 3 months of AVNS during stable AF, AVNS decreased average VR, respectively, 55% (n = 9), 48% (n = 8), and 28% (n = 6). The AVNS effect appeared to be dominantly parasympathetic. AVNS did not influence (1) the sinus node, (2) the refractory period of the atrial, ventricular tissue, and His and (3) hemodynamic parameters.
CONCLUSION: AVNS is efficient in reducing ventricular rate for at least 3 months using optimized parameters and specifically affects the parasympathetic nerves innervating the AV-node.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21969125     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-011-9619-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  29 in total

1.  Atrioventricular nodal conduction during atrial fibrillation: role of atrial input modification.

Authors:  S Garrigue; K A Mowrey; G Fahy; P J Tchou; T N Mazgalev
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-05-04       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Do atrial tachyarrhythmias beget ventricular tachyarrhythmias in defibrillator recipients?

Authors:  Kenneth M Stein; David E Euler; Rahul Mehra; Karlheinz Seidl; David J Slotwiner; Suneet Mittal; Steven M Markowitz; Bruce B Lerman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-07-17       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  Endocardial vagal atrioventricular node stimulation in humans: reproducibility on 18-month follow-up.

Authors:  Pietro Rossi; Stefano Bianchi; Sergio Valsecchi; Daniele Porcelli; Fabrizio Sgreccia; Antonio Lucifiero; Sergio Canonaco; Massimiliano Campoli; Mario Malavasi; Gianfranco Piccirillo; Raffaele Quaglione; Paolo Azzolini
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 5.214

4.  Post-operative atrial fibrillation management by selective epicardial vagal fat pad stimulation.

Authors:  Pietro Rossi; Stefano Bianchi; Antonio Barretta; Alberto Della Scala; Lilian Kornet; Ruggero De Paulis; Alessandro Bellisario; Vittorio D'Addio; Herribert Pavaci; Fabio Miraldi
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Separate parasympathetic control of heart rate and atrioventricular conduction of dogs.

Authors:  D W Wallick; P J Martin
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1990-08

6.  Determinants and effects of electrical stimulation of the inferior interatrial parasympathetic plexus during atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Pál Soós; Béla Merkely; Pál Maurovich Horvat; Endre Zima; Patrick Schauerte
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-12

7.  Ventricular rate control by selective vagal stimulation is superior to rhythm regularization by atrioventricular nodal ablation and pacing during atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Shaowei Zhuang; Youhua Zhang; Kent A Mowrey; Jianbo Li; Tomotsugu Tabata; Don W Wallick; Zoran B Popović; Richard A Grimm; Andrea Natale; Todor N Mazgalev
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Endocardial transcatheter stimulation of the AV nodal fat pad: stabilization of rapid ventricular rate response during atrial fibrillation in left ventricular failure.

Authors:  Stefano Bianchi; Pietro Rossi; Alberto Della Scala; Lilian Kornet
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2008-07-03

9.  Dependence of non-adrenergic inhibition of cardiac vagal action on peak frequency of sympathetic stimulation in the dog.

Authors:  T D Gardner; E K Potter
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Atrial fibrillation begets atrial fibrillation. A study in awake chronically instrumented goats.

Authors:  M C Wijffels; C J Kirchhof; R Dorland; M A Allessie
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1995-10-01       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  2 in total

1.  Effects of Vagal Nerve Stimulation on Ganglionated Plexi Nerve Activity and Ventricular Rate in Ambulatory Dogs With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Zhaolei Jiang; Ye Zhao; Wei-Chung Tsai; Yuan Yuan; Kroekkiat Chinda; Jian Tan; Patrick Onkka; Changyu Shen; Lan S Chen; Michael C Fishbein; Shien-Fong Lin; Peng-Sheng Chen; Thomas H Everett
Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-06-27

2.  Incomplete assessments: towards a better understanding of causes and solutions. The case of the interRAI home care instrument in Belgium.

Authors:  Dirk Vanneste; Johanna De Almeida Mello; Jean Macq; Chantal Van Audenhove; Anja Declercq
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.