Literature DB >> 21968569

Colorectal cancer cell surface protein profiling using an antibody microarray and fluorescence multiplexing.

Jerry Zhou1, Larissa Belov, Michael J Solomon, Charles Chan, Stephen J Clarke, Richard I Christopherson.   

Abstract

The current prognosis and classification of CRC relies on staging systems that integrate histopathologic and clinical findings. However, in the majority of CRC cases, cell dysfunction is the result of numerous mutations that modify protein expression and post-translational modification(1). A number of cell surface antigens, including cluster of differentiation (CD) antigens, have been identified as potential prognostic or metastatic biomarkers in CRC. These antigens make ideal biomarkers as their expression often changes with tumour progression or interactions with other cell types, such as tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs). The use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) for cancer sub-classification and prognostication is well established for some tumour types(2,3). However, no single 'marker' has shown prognostic significance greater than clinico-pathological staging or gained wide acceptance for use in routine pathology reporting of all CRC cases. A more recent approach to prognostic stratification of disease phenotypes relies on surface protein profiles using multiple 'markers'. While expression profiling of tumours using proteomic techniques such as iTRAQ is a powerful tool for the discovery of biomarkers4, it is not optimal for routine use in diagnostic laboratories and cannot distinguish different cell types in a mixed population. In addition, large amounts of tumour tissue are required for the profiling of purified plasma membrane glycoproteins by these methods. In this video we described a simple method for surface proteome profiling of viable cells from disaggregated CRC samples using a DotScan CRC antibody microarray. The 122-antibody microarray consists of a standard 82-antibody region recognizing a range of lineage-specific leukocyte markers, adhesion molecules, receptors and markers of inflammation and immune response(5), together with a satellite region for detection of 40 potentially prognostic markers for CRC. Cells are captured only on antibodies for which they express the corresponding antigen. The cell density per dot, determined by optical scanning, reflects the proportion of cells expressing that antigen, the level of expression of the antigen and affinity of the antibody(6). For CRC tissue or normal intestinal mucosa, optical scans reflect the immunophenotype of mixed populations of cells. Fluorescence multiplexing can then be used to profile selected sub-populations of cells of interest captured on the array. For example, Alexa 647-anti-epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM; CD326), is a pan-epithelial differentiation antigen that was used to detect CRC cells and also epithelial cells of normal intestinal mucosa, while Phycoerythrin-anti-CD3, was used to detect infiltrating T-cells(7). The DotScan CRC microarray should be the prototype for a diagnostic alternative to the anatomically-based CRC staging system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21968569      PMCID: PMC3230216          DOI: 10.3791/3322

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  10 in total

Review 1.  Rheology of mucin.

Authors:  J P Pearson; A Allen; D A Hutton
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2000

2.  Normalization for cDNA microarray data: a robust composite method addressing single and multiple slide systematic variation.

Authors:  Yee Hwa Yang; Sandrine Dudoit; Percy Luu; David M Lin; Vivian Peng; John Ngai; Terence P Speed
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  TM4: a free, open-source system for microarray data management and analysis.

Authors:  A I Saeed; V Sharov; J White; J Li; W Liang; N Bhagabati; J Braisted; M Klapa; T Currier; M Thiagarajan; A Sturn; M Snuffin; A Rezantsev; D Popov; A Ryltsov; E Kostukovich; I Borisovsky; Z Liu; A Vinsavich; V Trush; J Quackenbush
Journal:  Biotechniques       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.993

4.  Identification of repertoires of surface antigens on leukemias using an antibody microarray.

Authors:  Larissa Belov; Pauline Huang; Nicole Barber; Stephen P Mulligan; Richard I Christopherson
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 5.  National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: adjuvant therapy for breast cancer, November 1-3, 2000.

Authors:  P Eifel; J A Axelson; J Costa; J Crowley; W J Curran; A Deshler; S Fulton; C B Hendricks; M Kemeny; A B Kornblith; T A Louis; M Markman; R Mayer; D Roter
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-07-04       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Analysis of human leukaemias and lymphomas using extensive immunophenotypes from an antibody microarray.

Authors:  Larissa Belov; Stephen P Mulligan; Nicole Barber; Adrian Woolfson; Mike Scott; Kerryn Stoner; Jeremy S Chrisp; William A Sewell; Kenneth F Bradstock; Linda Bendall; Dana S Pascovici; Mervyn Thomas; Wendy Erber; Pauline Huang; Mary Sartor; Graham A R Young; James S Wiley; Surender Juneja; William G Wierda; Anthony R Green; Michael J Keating; Richard I Christopherson
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 7.  The role of proteomics in the diagnosis and outcome prediction in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  R Steinert; T Buschmann; M van der Linden; L M Fels; H Lippert; M A Reymond
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2002-08

8.  Surface antigen profiling of colorectal cancer using antibody microarrays with fluorescence multiplexing.

Authors:  Jerry Zhou; Larissa Belov; Pauline Y Huang; Joo-Shik Shin; Michael J Solomon; Pierre H Chapuis; Leslie Bokey; Charles Chan; Candice Clarke; Stephen J Clarke; Richard I Christopherson
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 2.303

9.  Multiplex detection of surface molecules on colorectal cancers.

Authors:  Peter Ellmark; Larissa Belov; Pauline Huang; C Soon Lee; Michael J Solomon; Daniel K Morgan; Richard I Christopherson
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.984

10.  Recent advances in proteomics and cancer biomarker discovery.

Authors:  Gary Guishan Xiao; Robert R Recker; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  Clin Med Oncol       Date:  2008-02-09
  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Extensive surface protein profiles of extracellular vesicles from cancer cells may provide diagnostic signatures from blood samples.

Authors:  Larissa Belov; Kieran J Matic; Susannah Hallal; O Giles Best; Stephen P Mulligan; Richard I Christopherson
Journal:  J Extracell Vesicles       Date:  2016-04-15

Review 2.  Single Domain Antibodies as New Biomarker Detectors.

Authors:  Chiuan Herng Leow; Katja Fischer; Chiuan Yee Leow; Qin Cheng; Candy Chuah; James McCarthy
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-17

Review 3.  Protein Array-based Approaches for Biomarker Discovery in Cancer.

Authors:  Yi Huang; Heng Zhu
Journal:  Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 7.691

4.  Inhibitory Monoclonal Antibodies and Their Recombinant Derivatives Targeting Surface-Exposed Carbonic Anhydrase XII on Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Dovile Stravinskiene; Aiste Sliziene; Lina Baranauskiene; Vilma Petrikaite; Aurelija Zvirbliene
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Multiplex flow cytometry barcoding and antibody arrays identify surface antigen profiles of primary and metastatic colon cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Kumar Sukhdeo; Rosanto I Paramban; Jason G Vidal; Jeanne Elia; Jody Martin; Maricruz Rivera; Daniel R Carrasco; Awad Jarrar; Matthew F Kalady; Christian T Carson; Robert Balderas; Anita B Hjelmeland; Justin D Lathia; Jeremy N Rich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.