Literature DB >> 12625789

The role of proteomics in the diagnosis and outcome prediction in colorectal cancer.

R Steinert1, T Buschmann, M van der Linden, L M Fels, H Lippert, M A Reymond.   

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is the second most frequent cancer in Western countries. Exogenous factors play a major role in the aetiology of sporadic colorectal cancer representing about 90% of all cases, hereditary cancers accounting for about 10% of patients. Thus, in the large majority of cases, cell dysfunction in CRC results from multiple rather than single, gene interactions. Numerous cellular events and environmental influences modify gene expression or post-translational protein modifications. Changes like glycosylation of proteins and lipids which are a common feature in colorectal cancer and influence cancer cell behaviour, cannot be directly detected by genetic studies. Better than genomics studies, functional proteomics studies allow the investigation of environmental factors over time, allowing the monitoring of metabolic responses to various stimuli. However, proteomics studies also have several drawbacks: a) current tools only allow narrow-range analyses, b) identification of proteins of interest remains cumbersome, c) protein studies address multiple compounds of high complexity, d) large amount of proteins are necessary to allow analysis, e) protein research require specific tools, e.g. tagged antibodies, that first have to be developed. Some protein tests are already in application for CRC: a classical prognostic test in colorectal cancer is based on the detection and quantification of a single protein (CEA) in body fluids. Recently, a screening assay based on APC protein truncation test has also been proposed. However, studies linking large protein expression patterns with clinical outcome in colorectal cancer are still in their infancy. To be able to predict occurrence of disease, and treatment outcome, more studies on genotype-phenotype correlations are needed both in sporadic and in hereditary colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12625789     DOI: 10.1177/153303460200100411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 1533-0338


  6 in total

1.  Effects of inositol hexaphosphate on proliferation of HT-29 human colon carcinoma cell line.

Authors:  Ying Tian; Yang Song
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Clinical phenotype and prevalence of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome in Chinese population.

Authors:  Yuan-Zhi Zhang; Jian-Qiu Sheng; Shi-Rong Li; Hong Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Colorectal cancer cell surface protein profiling using an antibody microarray and fluorescence multiplexing.

Authors:  Jerry Zhou; Larissa Belov; Michael J Solomon; Charles Chan; Stephen J Clarke; Richard I Christopherson
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 4.  Novel translational strategies in colorectal cancer research.

Authors:  Ignacio Gil-Bazo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Current status and prospects of clinical proteomics studies on detection of colorectal cancer: hopes and fears.

Authors:  M E de Noo; R A E M Tollenaar; A M Deelder; L H Bouwman
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Proteomic serum profile of fatigued men receiving localized external beam radiation therapy for non-metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Nada Lukkahatai; Sajni Patel; Marjan Gucek; Chao-Pin Hsiao; Leorey N Saligan
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 3.612

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.