Literature DB >> 21967937

Biodegradation of orthodontic metallic brackets and associated implications for friction.

Saulo Regis1, Paulo Soares, Elisa S Camargo, Odilon Guariza Filho, Orlando Tanaka, Hiroshi Maruo.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to assess the effect of clinical exposure on the surface morphology, dimensions, and frictional behavior of metallic orthodontic brackets.
METHODS: Ninety-five brackets, of 3 commercial brands, were retrieved from patients who had finished orthodontic treatment. As-received brackets, matched by type and brand, were used for comparisons. Surface morphology and precipitated material were analyzed by optical and scanning electron microscopy and x-ray microanalysis. Bracket dimensions were measured with a measuring microscope. Resistance to sliding on a stainless steel wire was assessed.
RESULTS: Retrieved brackets showed surface alterations from corrosion, wear, and plastic deformation, especially in the external slot edges. Film deposition over the alloy surface was observed to a variable extent. The main elements in the film were carbon, oxygen, calcium, and phosphorus. The as-received brackets showed differences (P <0.05) in the slot sizes among brands, and 1 brand showed a 3% increase in the retrieved brackets' slots. The frictional behavior differed among brands. Retrieved brackets of 2 brands showed 10% to 20% increases in resistance to sliding.
CONCLUSIONS: Metallic brackets undergo significant degradation during orthodontic treatment, possibly with increased friction. At present, it is difficult to predict the impact of these changes on the clinical performance of orthodontic components.
Copyright © 2011 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21967937     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.01.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  10 in total

1.  Prophylaxis protocols and their impact on bracket friction force.

Authors:  Sérgio Elias Neves Cury; Silvio Augusto Bellini-Pereira; Aron Aliaga-Del Castillo; Sérgio Schneider; Arnaldo Pinzan; Guilherme Janson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Orthodontic appliances did not increase risk of dental caries and periodontal disease under preventive protocol.

Authors:  Ana Zilda Nazar Bergamo; Katharina Morant Holanda de Oliveira; Mírian Aiko Nakane Matsumoto; Cássio do Nascimento; Fábio Lourenço Romano; Raquel Assed Bezerra da Silva; Lea Assed Bezerra da Silva; Paulo Nelson-Filho
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  First order couples induced by nickel-titanium archwires featuring an electrochemically refined surface during simulated rotation of teeth.

Authors:  Leif Johannessen; Ludger Keilig; Susanne Reimann; Andreas Jäger; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  Corrosion of orthodontic brackets: qualitative and quantitative surface analysis.

Authors:  Romy A Doomen; Ivana Nedeljkovic; Reinder B Kuitert; Cornelis J Kleverlaan; Burcu Aydin
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 2.684

5.  Biomonitorization of metal ions in the serum of Iranian patients treated with fixed orthodontic appliances in comparison with controls in eastern Iran.

Authors:  Mahdjoube Goldani Moghadam; Reyhane Hoshyar; Marcin Mikulewicz; Katarzyna Chojnacka; Geir Bjørklund; Joeri J Pen; Nammam Ali Azadi; Maghdad Pirsaheb; Meysam Dashtaki; Borhan Mansouri
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Effect of applied moment on resistance to sliding among esthetic self-ligating brackets.

Authors:  Benjamin T Pliska; Rick W Fuchs; John P Beyer; Brent E Larson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 7.  Orthodontic brackets friction changes after clinical use: A systematic review.

Authors:  Sérgio-Elias-Neves Cury; Aron Aliaga-Del Castillo; Arnaldo Pinzan; Karine-Laskos Sakoda; Silvio-Augusto Bellini-Pereira; Guilherme Janson
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2019-05-01

8.  Comparison of static friction and surface topography of low friction and conventional TMA orthodontic arch wires: An in-vitro study.

Authors:  Nouf Alsabti; Nabeel Talic
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2020-03-19

9.  Assessment of Bracket Surface Morphology and Dimensional Change.

Authors:  Pillai Devu Radhakrishnan; N K Sapna Varma; V V Ajith
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

Review 10.  Resistance to sliding in orthodontics: misconception or method error? A systematic review and a proposal of a test protocol.

Authors:  Fabio Savoldi; Aggeliki Papoutsi; Simona Dianiskova; Domenico Dalessandri; Stefano Bonetti; James K H Tsoi; Jukka P Matinlinna; Corrado Paganelli
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 1.372

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.