| Literature DB >> 21967744 |
Paulino Gómez-Puertas1, Sarbelio Rodríguez Muñoz2, Elena López3, Jan-Jaap Wesselink1,4, Isabel López5, Jesús Mendieta1,4.
Abstract
Reversible protein phosphorylation is one of the most important forms of cellular regulation. Thus, phosphoproteomic analysis of protein phosphorylation in cells is a powerful tool to evaluate cell functional status. The importance of protein kinase-regulated signal transduction pathways in human cancer has led to the development of drugs that inhibit protein kinases at the apex or intermediary levels of these pathways. Phosphoproteomic analysis of these signalling pathways will provide important insights for operation and connectivity of these pathways to facilitate identification of the best targets for cancer therapies. Enrichment of phosphorylated proteins or peptides from tissue or bodily fluid samples is required. The application of technologies such as phosphoenrichments, mass spectrometry (MS) coupled to bioinformatics tools is crucial for the identification and quantification of protein phosphorylation sites for advancing in such relevant clinical research. A combination of different phosphopeptide enrichments, quantitative techniques and bioinformatic tools is necessary to achieve good phospho-regulation data and good structural analysis of protein studies. The current and most useful proteomics and bioinformatics techniques will be explained with research examples. Our aim in this article is to be helpful for cancer research via detailing proteomics and bioinformatic tools.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21967744 PMCID: PMC3195713 DOI: 10.1186/2043-9113-1-26
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Bioinforma ISSN: 2043-9113
Figure 1A prototypical proteomics pipe-line coupled to bioinformatics useful for clinical research. Depending on the application, different samples processed and fed into the proteomics pipeline yield different results. The pipeline's several steps are listed in the different panels: (1) proteolytic digest, (2) the separation and ionization of peptides, (3) their analysis by mass spectrometry, (4) fragmentation of selected peptides and analysis of the resulting MS/MS spectra and, (5) (6) data-computer bioinformatic-analysis, which mainly includes: Conversion-data format, Spectrum identification with a search engine, Validation of identifications, Protein inference, Organization in local data managements systems, Interpretation and classification of the protein lists, Transfer to public data repositories, Identification and Classification of proteins, Quantification, Structural Analysis of proteins, PTM analysis and Cellular composition.
Figure 2Routine pipe-line for structural bioinformatics analysis of protein phosphorylated states. Once the protein is identified, a sequence-based search (1) in the Protein Data Bank (http://www.rcsb.org/pdb) structure database is done to download a 3D structure suitable to be used in computational simulation studies. In the case that the protein is not present in the database, bioinformatics modelling methods are used to generate an approximate model of the desired structures (2). Next step consists of the generation of the 3D model for the single protein or the interacting pair of proteins both in the unphosphorylated (basal) or the phosphorylated states (3). Finally, a Molecular Dynamics approach is used to compare the behaviour of the two states. RMSD (root mean square distance) values are collected for several nanoseconds in order to obtain a quantitative measure of the differences (4).
Figure 3Case study. Analysis of the structural interactions of GRK2 [Swiss-Prot: P21146], Gαq [Swiss-Prot: P21279] and Gβγ proteins [Swiss-Prot: P62871and Swiss-Prot: P63212] according to the crystallized structure of the macromolecular complex [PDB: 2BCJ]. A. Crystallized structure of the complex of GRK2, Gαq and Gβγ polypeptides. Position of a GTP molecule in Gαq active centre is indicated. B. Computer model of the electrostatic interaction between a putative phosphorylated GRK2-Ser121 residue and Arg214 of Gαq. C: Surface models for GRK2 protein in the vicinity of Ser121 residue. Left: Unphosphorylated Ser121; centre: model for the putative phosphorylated state of Ser121. Right: complementarity between the positively Arg214 and negative pSer121charged residues patched in both protein surfaces, probably implicated in the stabilization of the complex. D. Root mean square deviation (RMSD) plots of the protein domains implicated in the GRK2-Gαq interaction in presence (green) or absence (red) of phosphorylated Ser121 during a simulation of molecular dynamics. Plots are presented solely to illustrate the putative stabilization of the complex after Ser121 phosphorylation. Figure plots were generated using PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Schrödinger, LLC.