Literature DB >> 17939157

Evaluation of the impact of some experimental procedures on different phosphopeptide enrichment techniques.

Søren S Jensen1, Martin R Larsen.   

Abstract

The complete characterization of phosphorylated proteins requires an efficient procedure for the enrichment of phosphopeptides from amongst a complicated peptide mixture. The sensitivity of the traditional immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) approach is severely affected by various buffers, detergents and other reagents normally utilized in biochemical and cell biological procedures, and thus pre-purification steps such as reversed-phase chromatography is required prior to phosphopeptide enrichment. Here we evaluate the use of different 'non-phosphopeptide-excluding compounds' in the loading buffer for titanium dioxide (TiO(2)) chromatography and show that TiO(2) is more robust and tolerant towards many reagents, including salts, detergents and other low molecular mass molecules, than conventional IMAC. In addition, we show that the inclusion of various detergents can enhance the efficiency of this enrichment method, as phosphopeptides that otherwise adhere to plastic surfaces can be efficiently solubilized and subsequently purified. The TiO(2) chromatography technique is also compared to zirconium dioxide chromatography for phosphopeptide enrichment. Copyright 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17939157     DOI: 10.1002/rcm.3254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 0951-4198            Impact factor:   2.419


  62 in total

1.  Evaluation of the new MALDI matrix 4-chloro-alpha-cyanocinnamic acid.

Authors:  John D Leszyk
Journal:  J Biomol Tech       Date:  2010-07

2.  In-depth analyses of kinase-dependent tyrosine phosphoproteomes based on metal ion-functionalized soluble nanopolymers.

Authors:  Anton B Iliuk; Victoria A Martin; Bethany M Alicie; Robert L Geahlen; W Andy Tao
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 5.911

3.  Universal non-antibody detection of protein phosphorylation using pIMAGO.

Authors:  Anton B Iliuk; W Andy Tao
Journal:  Curr Protoc Chem Biol       Date:  2015-03-02

4.  Phosphorylation site mapping of soluble proteins: bioinformatical filtering reveals potential plastidic phosphoproteins in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Katharina Lohrig; Bernd Müller; Joulia Davydova; Dario Leister; Dirk Andreas Wolters
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 4.116

5.  Chemical visualization of phosphoproteomes on membrane.

Authors:  Anton Iliuk; X Shawn Liu; Liang Xue; Xiaoqi Liu; W Andy Tao
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 6.  Challenges in plasma membrane phosphoproteomics.

Authors:  Benjamin C Orsburn; Luke H Stockwin; Dianne L Newton
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.940

7.  Evaluation of quantitative performance of sequential immobilized metal affinity chromatographic enrichment for phosphopeptides.

Authors:  Zeyu Sun; Karyn L Hamilton; Kenneth F Reardon
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.365

8.  Phosphoproteomic characterization of the signaling network resulting from activation of the chemokine receptor CCR2.

Authors:  Cheng Huang; Simon R Foster; Anup D Shah; Oded Kleifeld; Meritxell Canals; Ralf B Schittenhelm; Martin J Stone
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  Quantitative analysis of global phosphorylation changes with high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry and stable isotopic labeling.

Authors:  Hye Kyong Kweon; Philip C Andrews
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 3.608

10.  ARHGEF7 (Beta-PIX) acts as guanine nucleotide exchange factor for leucine-rich repeat kinase 2.

Authors:  Karina Haebig; Christian Johannes Gloeckner; Marta Garcia Miralles; Frank Gillardon; Claudia Schulte; Olaf Riess; Marius Ueffing; Saskia Biskup; Michael Bonin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.