Literature DB >> 21967534

Incidence and avoidance of neurologic complications with paddle type spinal cord stimulation leads.

Robert Levy1, Jaimie Henderson, Konstantin Slavin, Brian A Simpson, Giancarlo Barolat, Jane Shipley, Richard North.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: While reference is frequently made to the risk of spinal cord or nerve root injury with the surgical implantation of paddle type spinal cord stimulation (SCS) electrodes, data are lacking on the frequency, causes, and prevention of these complications.
METHODS: To determine the incidence and frequency of neurologic complications, we performed 1) a comprehensive analysis of the literature to determine the incidence of complications that have caused or could lead to neurologic injury; 2) an analysis of the US Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) data base; and 3) an investigation of manufacturers' data on surgically implanted paddle electrodes. We then convened an expert panel of neurosurgeons experienced in the surgical implantation of paddle electrodes to provide recommendations to minimize the risk of neurologic injury.
RESULTS: The scientific literature describes the breadth of neurologic complications that can result from SCS electrode implantation but does not provide interpretable data with respect to the incidence and frequency of these complications. The MAUDE data base is not constructed to be sensitive or specific enough to provide these critical data. Primary data show a risk of neurologic injury from implantation of paddle electrodes below 0.6%. DISCUSSION: Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative measures to further minimize this risk are described.
CONCLUSIONS: This investigation, the first comprehensive evaluation of the incidence and frequency of neurologic injury as a result of SCS paddle electrode implantation, suggests that neurologic injury is a rare, but serious, complication of SCS. The incidence of these complications should be decreased by the adoption of approaches that improve procedural safety and by careful patient follow-up and complication management. Physicians should be aware of these approaches and take every precaution to reduce the risk of neurologic injury. Physicians also should report any adverse event leading to injury or death and work together to improve access to these data.
© 2011 International Neuromodulation Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21967534     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2011.00395.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuromodulation        ISSN: 1094-7159


  11 in total

1.  Safety of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients Who Routinely Use Anticoagulants.

Authors:  Hirah Khan; Vignessh Kumar; Zohal Ghulam-Jelani; Sarah E McCallum; Ellie Hobson; Vishad Sukul; Julie G Pilitsis
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 2.  Spinal Cord Stimulation for Pain Treatment After Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Qian Huang; Wanru Duan; Eellan Sivanesan; Shuguang Liu; Fei Yang; Zhiyong Chen; Neil C Ford; Xueming Chen; Yun Guan
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 5.203

3.  Long-Term Continuous Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulation Exerts Neuroprotective Effects in Experimental Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Ken Kuwahara; Tatsuya Sasaki; Takao Yasuhara; Masahiro Kameda; Yosuke Okazaki; Kakeru Hosomoto; Ittetsu Kin; Mihoko Okazaki; Satoru Yabuno; Satoshi Kawauchi; Yousuke Tomita; Michiari Umakoshi; Kyohei Kin; Jun Morimoto; Jea-Young Lee; Naoki Tajiri; Cesar V Borlongan; Isao Date
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 5.750

4.  Safety Analysis of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation in the Treatment of Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Timothy Deer; Jason Pope; Corey Hunter; Steven Falowski; Leonardo Kapural; Jeffery Kramer; Robert Levy
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2019-03-12

5.  Non-invasive Autonomic Neuromodulation Is Opening New Landscapes for Cardiovascular Diseases.

Authors:  Mingxian Chen; Songyun Wang; Xuping Li; Lilei Yu; Hui Yang; Qiming Liu; Jianjun Tang; Shenghua Zhou
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 6.  An Examination of Mobile Spinal Cord Stimulators on Treating Parkinson Disease.

Authors:  Zhen-Jie Wang; Takao Yasuhara
Journal:  Brain Circ       Date:  2021-03-30

7.  The Incidence of Spinal Cord Injury in Implantation of Percutaneous and Paddle Electrodes for Spinal Cord Stimulation.

Authors:  Frank W Petraglia; S Harrison Farber; Robert Gramer; Terence Verla; Frances Wang; Steven Thomas; Beth Parente; Shivanand P Lad
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2015-12-08

8.  Are there a guidelines for implantable spinal cord stimulator therapy in patients using chronic anticoagulation therapy? - A review of decision-making in the high-risk patient.

Authors:  Ramsis F Ghaly; Alexei Lissounov; Kenneth D Candido; Nebojsa Nick Knezevic
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2016-04-07

Review 9.  A review of spinal cord stimulation systems for chronic pain.

Authors:  Paul Verrills; Chantelle Sinclair; Adele Barnard
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.133

10.  Late Spontaneous Migration of a Dorsal Column Stimulator Paddle Lead.

Authors:  Chao Li; Michael A Galgano; David A Carter
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2016-08-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.