Literature DB >> 21967420

Phenotypic assortment mediates the effect of social selection in a wild beetle population.

Vincent A Formica1, Joel W McGlothlin, Corlett W Wood, Malcolm E Augat, Rebecca E Butterfield, Mollie E Barnard, Edmund D Brodie.   

Abstract

Social interactions often have major fitness consequences, but little is known about how specific interacting phenotypes affect the strength of natural selection. Social influences on the evolutionary process can be assessed using a multilevel selection approach that partitions the effects of social partner phenotypes on fitness (referred to as social or group selection) from those of the traits of a focal individual (nonsocial or individual selection). To quantify the contribution of social selection to total selection affecting a trait, the patterns of phenotypic association among interactants must also be considered. We estimated selection gradients on male body size in a wild population of forked fungus beetles (Bolitotherus cornutus). We detected positive nonsocial selection and negative social selection on body size operating through differences in copulation success, indicating that large males with small social partners had highest fitness. In addition, we found that, in low-density demes, the phenotypes of focal individuals were negatively correlated with those of their social partners. This pattern reversed the negative effect of group selection on body size and led to stronger positive selection for body size. Our results demonstrate multilevel selection in nature and stress the importance of considering social selection whenever conspecific interactions occur nonrandomly.
© 2011 The Author(s). Evolution© 2011 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21967420     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01340.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  21 in total

1.  Drosophila melanogaster females change mating behaviour and offspring production based on social context.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Billeter; Samyukta Jagadeesh; Nancy Stepek; Reza Azanchi; Joel D Levine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Genetic variation in social influence on mate preferences.

Authors:  Darren Rebar; Rafael L Rodríguez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Sexual networks: measuring sexual selection in structured, polyandrous populations.

Authors:  Grant C McDonald; Richard James; Jens Krause; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Social preferences based on sexual attractiveness: a female strategy to reduce male sexual attention.

Authors:  Josefine B Brask; Darren P Croft; Katharine Thompson; Torben Dabelsteen; Safi K Darden
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Social selection is density dependent but makes little contribution to total selection in New Zealand giraffe weevils.

Authors:  David N Fisher; Rebecca J LeGrice; Christina J Painting
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.530

6.  Social animal models for quantifying plasticity, assortment, and selection on interacting phenotypes.

Authors:  Jordan S Martin; Adrian V Jaeggi
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 2.516

7.  Selection for territory acquisition is modulated by social network structure in a wild songbird.

Authors:  D R Farine; B C Sheldon
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 2.411

8.  Quantitative genetic versions of Hamilton's rule with empirical applications.

Authors:  Joel W McGlothlin; Jason B Wolf; Edmund D Brodie; Allen J Moore
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Morphological correlates of a combat performance trait in the forked fungus beetle, Bolitotherus cornutus.

Authors:  Kyle M Benowitz; Edmund D Brodie; Vincent A Formica
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The importance of selection at the level of the pair over 25 years in a natural population of birds.

Authors:  Mats Björklund; Lars Gustafsson
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.