OBJECTIVES: Informal caregivers of hospice patients experience multiple stressors that can negatively impact physical, psychological, and emotional health. The Caregiver Life Line (CaLL) study was a one-group, intervention-only feasibility study of a telephone cognitive-behavioral stress-management intervention consisting of 10 to 12 weekly telephone counseling calls designed specifically for informal caregivers of home-based hospice patients. METHODS: Caregivers, who were recruited via seven participating hospices, were assessed at baseline, 3, and 6 months. Psychosocial measures included depression, perceived stress, benefit finding, social support, and quality of life (QoL). Process evaluation was also conducted at 6 months. RESULTS: Of the 25 participants, 19 completed the 12-week intervention. The mean age was 60.3 years; 91% were female and 70% married. Forty-eight percent were caring for a spouse; 51% were caring for a parent or other family member. Participating caregivers and hospice staff reported high levels of satisfaction with the intervention. Although the small sample size and lack of a control group limit our ability to assess the efficacy of the intervention, psychosocial outcomes changed in the expected direction and participants reported high levels of self-efficacy regarding their ability to implement the adaptive coping skills. Interestingly, we observed a decrease in physical QoL across the three time points. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated that the CaLL intervention is feasible and acceptable to informal hospice caregivers. This report describes important lessons learned from the pilot study with the intention of informing future intervention studies with this population.
OBJECTIVES: Informal caregivers of hospice patients experience multiple stressors that can negatively impact physical, psychological, and emotional health. The Caregiver Life Line (CaLL) study was a one-group, intervention-only feasibility study of a telephone cognitive-behavioral stress-management intervention consisting of 10 to 12 weekly telephone counseling calls designed specifically for informal caregivers of home-based hospice patients. METHODS: Caregivers, who were recruited via seven participating hospices, were assessed at baseline, 3, and 6 months. Psychosocial measures included depression, perceived stress, benefit finding, social support, and quality of life (QoL). Process evaluation was also conducted at 6 months. RESULTS: Of the 25 participants, 19 completed the 12-week intervention. The mean age was 60.3 years; 91% were female and 70% married. Forty-eight percent were caring for a spouse; 51% were caring for a parent or other family member. Participating caregivers and hospice staff reported high levels of satisfaction with the intervention. Although the small sample size and lack of a control group limit our ability to assess the efficacy of the intervention, psychosocial outcomes changed in the expected direction and participants reported high levels of self-efficacy regarding their ability to implement the adaptive coping skills. Interestingly, we observed a decrease in physical QoL across the three time points. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated that the CaLL intervention is feasible and acceptable to informal hospice caregivers. This report describes important lessons learned from the pilot study with the intention of informing future intervention studies with this population.
Authors: Pamela H Mitchell; Lynda Powell; James Blumenthal; Jennifer Norten; Gail Ironson; Carol Rogers Pitula; Erika Sivarajan Froelicher; Susan Czajkowski; Marston Youngblood; Marc Huber; Lisa F Berkman Journal: J Cardiopulm Rehabil Date: 2003 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 2.081
Authors: M H Antoni; J M Lehman; K M Kilbourn; A E Boyers; J L Culver; S M Alferi; S E Yount; B A McGregor; P L Arena; S D Harris; A A Price; C S Carver Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Kiri Walsh; Louise Jones; Adrian Tookman; Christina Mason; Joanne McLoughlin; Robert Blizard; Michael King Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 9.319
Authors: David A Fleming; Vanessa B Sheppard; Patricia A Mangan; Kathryn L Taylor; Michelle Tallarico; Inez Adams; Jane Ingham Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: A C Marcus; K M Garrett; D Cella; L B Wenzel; M J Brady; L A Crane; M W McClatchey; B C Kluhsman; M Pate-Willig Journal: Psychooncology Date: 1998 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: K E Covinsky; L Goldman; E F Cook; R Oye; N Desbiens; D Reding; W Fulkerson; A F Connors; J Lynn; R S Phillips Journal: JAMA Date: 1994-12-21 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Carl Eisdorfer; Sara J Czaja; David A Loewenstein; Mark P Rubert; Soledad Argüelles; Victoria B Mitrani; José Szapocznik Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2003-08
Authors: Debra Parker Oliver; David L Albright; Karla Washington; Elaine Wittenberg-Lyles; Ashley Gage; Megan Mooney; George Demiris Journal: J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care Date: 2013
Authors: Catherine E Mosher; Joseph G Winger; Nasser Hanna; Shadia I Jalal; Lawrence H Einhorn; Thomas J Birdas; DuyKhanh P Ceppa; Kenneth A Kesler; Jordan Schmitt; Deborah A Kashy; Victoria L Champion Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2016-07-09 Impact factor: 3.612