Jennifer Mindell1, Maria Aresu, Laia Bécares, Hanna Tolonen. 1. Health and Social Surveys Research Group, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK. j.mindell@ucl.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: General population health examination surveys (HESs) provide a reliable source of information to monitor the health of populations. A number of countries across Europe are currently planning their first HES, or the first after a significant gap, and some of these intend offering appointments only during office hours and/or weekdays, raising concerns about representativeness of survey participants. It is important to ascertain whether personal characteristics of participants vary by time of day and day of week of data collection, in order to determine the association between time and day of interview and physical examination on the results of data collected in HES. METHODS: Multivariable regression models were applied to national HES in England to examine socio-demographic and health variations in three combined day-time periods of interview and physical examination: weekday daytime; weekday evening; and weekend. RESULTS: The characteristics of participants interviewed or visited by a nurse varied by both time of day and day of the week for age, ethnicity, marital status, income, socio-economic group, economic activity and deprivation. People seen during weekday working hours had higher rates of poor self-reported health, limiting longstanding illness and obesity, and higher alcohol consumption, BMI and systolic blood pressure; adjustment for socio-demographic characteristics eliminated or substantially reduced these differences. CONCLUSION: People responsible for planning surveys should be aware of participant preference for the timing of data collection and ensure flexibility and choice in times and days offered to optimise participation rates and representativeness.
BACKGROUND: General population health examination surveys (HESs) provide a reliable source of information to monitor the health of populations. A number of countries across Europe are currently planning their first HES, or the first after a significant gap, and some of these intend offering appointments only during office hours and/or weekdays, raising concerns about representativeness of survey participants. It is important to ascertain whether personal characteristics of participants vary by time of day and day of week of data collection, in order to determine the association between time and day of interview and physical examination on the results of data collected in HES. METHODS: Multivariable regression models were applied to national HES in England to examine socio-demographic and health variations in three combined day-time periods of interview and physical examination: weekday daytime; weekday evening; and weekend. RESULTS: The characteristics of participants interviewed or visited by a nurse varied by both time of day and day of the week for age, ethnicity, marital status, income, socio-economic group, economic activity and deprivation. People seen during weekday working hours had higher rates of poor self-reported health, limiting longstanding illness and obesity, and higher alcohol consumption, BMI and systolic blood pressure; adjustment for socio-demographic characteristics eliminated or substantially reduced these differences. CONCLUSION:People responsible for planning surveys should be aware of participant preference for the timing of data collection and ensure flexibility and choice in times and days offered to optimise participation rates and representativeness.
Authors: Antoine Messiah; Juan M Acuna; Grettel Castro; Pura Rodríguez de la Vega; Guillaume Vaiva; James Shultz; Yuval Neria; Mario De La Rosa Journal: Disaster Health Date: 2015-02-18
Authors: Guili Zheng; Sona Oksuzyan; Shelly Hsu; Jennifer Cloud; Mirna Ponce Jewell; Nirvi Shah; Lisa V Smith; Douglas Frye; Tony Kuo Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2018-12 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Michelle Sims; Jennifer S Mindell; Martin J Jarvis; Colin Feyerabend; Heather Wardle; Anna Gilmore Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2011-12-12 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Jennifer S Mindell; Simona Giampaoli; Antje Goesswald; Panagiotis Kamtsiuris; Charlotte Mann; Satu Männistö; Karen Morgan; Nicola J Shelton; W M Monique Verschuren; Hanna Tolonen Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Anna Fry; Thomas J Littlejohns; Cathie Sudlow; Nicola Doherty; Ligia Adamska; Tim Sprosen; Rory Collins; Naomi E Allen Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Athanasios Andriopoulos; Erik M G Olsson; Ylva Hägg Sylvén; Jonas Sjöström; Birgitta Johansson; Louise von Essen; Helena Grönqvist Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-03-12 Impact factor: 5.428