Literature DB >> 29654397

Self-Reported Interest to Participate in a Health Survey if Different Amounts of Cash or Non-Monetary Incentive Types Were Offered.

Guili Zheng1, Sona Oksuzyan2, Shelly Hsu3, Jennifer Cloud4, Mirna Ponce Jewell5, Nirvi Shah6, Lisa V Smith4,7, Douglas Frye4, Tony Kuo8,9,10.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess monetary and non-monetary factors that can influence the decision to participate in a future health survey. A questionnaire was administered to eligible, low-income participants (n = 1502) of the 2012 Los Angeles County Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (LAHANES-II). Multivariable regression analyses were performed to describe factors potentially associated with future intent to participate in similar survey designs. The results of the survey suggest that, overall, female participants had a greater interest in participating under a variety of incentive scenarios. Compared to the 25-34 age group, older participants (35-44, 45-84) reported more interest to participate if $10 cash [prepaid gift/debit card], a coupon for product/travel, or a small item [e.g., granola bar, t-shirt, pen] was offered, whereas younger participants (18-24) reported greater interest for $25 cash or a coupon for product/travel. Non-Whites, when compared to Whites/Non-Hispanics, reported greater interest to participate if any of the incentives was offered. High school graduates, when compared to those with some college education, reported greater interest to participate if $10 cash, a small item, or a lottery ticket was offered. Presence of two or more chronic conditions increased interest while concerns about participation in LAHANES-II was associated with reduced interest to participate in future health-related surveys. The results suggest that both incentives and non-monetary considerations (e.g., personal concerns about participating and individual level characteristics) can influence the decision to participate in health-related surveys and offer insights into strategies that can improve response rates for these assessments that are often used to inform community planning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health assessment; Health survey; Response rates; Survey incentives

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29654397      PMCID: PMC6286275          DOI: 10.1007/s11524-018-0237-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urban Health        ISSN: 1099-3460            Impact factor:   3.671


  24 in total

1.  The validity of information on "race" and "Hispanic ethnicity" in California birth certificate data.

Authors:  L Baumeister; K Marchi; M Pearl; R Williams; P Braveman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Public perceptions of environmental quality: a survey study of beach use and perceptions in Los Angeles County.

Authors:  L Pendleton; N Martin; D G Webster
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.553

3.  Response rates and response bias for 50 surveys of pediatricians.

Authors:  William L Cull; Karen G O'Connor; Sanford Sharp; Suk-fong S Tang
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  [Association between depression and chronic diseases: results from a population-based study].

Authors:  Antonio Fernando Boing; Guilherme Rocha Melo; Alexandra Crispim Boing; Rodrigo Otávio Moretti-Pires; Karen Glazer Peres; Marco Aurélio Peres
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 2.106

5.  The new food package and breastfeeding outcomes among women, infants, and children participants in Los Angeles County.

Authors:  Brent A Langellier; M Pia Chaparro; May C Wang; Maria Koleilat; Shannon E Whaley
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  A qualitative study of recruitment barriers, motivators, and community-based strategies for increasing clinical trials participation among rural and urban populations.

Authors:  Daniela B Friedman; Caroline Foster; Caroline D Bergeron; Andrea Tanner; Sei-Hill Kim
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2014-03-26

7.  Cash incentives improve participation rate in a face-to-face survey: an intervention study.

Authors:  Ke Chen; Han Lei; Ge Li; Wei Huang; Lihong Mu
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 6.437

8.  Effect of Financial Incentives to Physicians, Patients, or Both on Lipid Levels: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  David A Asch; Andrea B Troxel; Walter F Stewart; Thomas D Sequist; James B Jones; AnneMarie G Hirsch; Karen Hoffer; Jingsan Zhu; Wenli Wang; Amanda Hodlofski; Antonette B Frasch; Mark G Weiner; Darra D Finnerty; Meredith B Rosenthal; Kelsey Gangemi; Kevin G Volpp
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  A case study of a hepatitis B screening and blood pressure assesment program in Los Angeles County, 2012-2013.

Authors:  Noel C Barragan; Mimi Chang; Jennifer Felderman; Heather Readhead; Tony Kuo
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  The Oslo Health Study: The impact of self-selection in a large, population-based survey.

Authors:  Anne Johanne Søgaard; Randi Selmer; Espen Bjertness; Dag Thelle
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2004-05-06
View more
  2 in total

1.  Promoting Adolescent Healthy Relationships (The About Us Program): Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Pamela Anderson; Karin Coyle; Stephanie Guinosso; John L Ferrand; Arthur Owora; Rebecca F Houghton; Eric Walsh-Buhi
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2021-09-01

2.  Challenge Accepted! a Critical Reflection on How to Perform a Health Survey Among University Students-An Example of the Healthy Campus Mainz Project.

Authors:  Jennifer L Reichel; Thomas Rigotti; Ana Nanette Tibubos; Antonia M Werner; Markus Schäfer; Dennis Edelmann; Daniel Pfirrmann; Nicole Deci; Manfred E Beutel; Birgit Stark; Perikles Simon; Stephan Letzel; Pavel Dietz
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-06-21
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.