Literature DB >> 21962740

Use of administrative data to identify colorectal liver metastasis.

Daniel A Anaya1, Natasha S Becker, Peter Richardson, Neena S Abraham.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ability to identify patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) liver metastasis (LM) using administrative data is unknown. The goals of this study were to evaluate whether administrative data can accurately identify patients with CRCLM and to develop a diagnostic algorithm capable of identifying such patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to validate the diagnostic and procedural codes found in administrative databases of the Veterans Administration (VA) system. CRC patients evaluated at a major VA center were identified (1997-2008, n = 1671) and classified as having liver-specific ICD-9 and/or CPT codes. The presence of CRCLM was verified by primary chart abstraction in the study sample. Contingency tables were created and the positive predictive value (PPV) for CRCLM was calculated for each candidate administrative code. A multivariate logistic-regression model was used to identify independent predictors (codes) of CRCLM, which were used to develop a diagnostic algorithm. Validity of the algorithm was determined by discrimination (c-statistic) of the model and PPV of the algorithm.
RESULTS: Multivariate logistic regression identified ICD-9 diagnosis codes 155.2 (OR 9.7 [95% CI 2.5-38.4]) and 197.7 (84.6 [52.9-135.3]), and procedure code 50.22 (5.9 [1.3-25.5]) as independent predictors of CRCLM diagnosis. The model's discrimination was 0.89. The diagnostic algorithm, defined as the presence of any of these codes, had a PPV of 87%.
CONCLUSIONS: VA administrative databases reliably identify patients with CRCLM. This diagnostic algorithm is highly predictive of CRCLM diagnosis and can be used for research studies evaluating population-level features of this disease within the VA system. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21962740     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.07.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  8 in total

1.  Detecting Lung and Colorectal Cancer Recurrence Using Structured Clinical/Administrative Data to Enable Outcomes Research and Population Health Management.

Authors:  Michael J Hassett; Hajime Uno; Angel M Cronin; Nikki M Carroll; Mark C Hornbrook; Debra Ritzwoller
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  A Systematic Review of Estimating Breast Cancer Recurrence at the Population Level With Administrative Data.

Authors:  Hava Izci; Tim Tambuyzer; Krizia Tuand; Victoria Depoorter; Annouschka Laenen; Hans Wildiers; Ignace Vergote; Liesbet Van Eycken; Harlinde De Schutter; Freija Verdoodt; Patrick Neven
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Post-treatment surveillance of patients with colorectal cancer with surgically treated liver metastases.

Authors:  Omar Hyder; Rebecca M Dodson; Skye C Mayo; Eric B Schneider; Matthew J Weiss; Joseph M Herman; Christopher L Wolfgang; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Development of a claims-based algorithm to identify colorectal cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Anjali D Deshpande; Mario Schootman; Allese Mayer
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 3.797

5.  Postoperative mortality and need for transitional care following liver resection for metastatic disease in elderly patients: a population-level analysis of 4026 patients.

Authors:  Sonia T Orcutt; Avo Artinyan; Linda T Li; Eric J Silberfein; David H Berger; Daniel Albo; Daniel A Anaya
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Metabolic syndrome, metabolic comorbid conditions and risk of early-onset colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hanyu Chen; Xiaobin Zheng; Xiaoyu Zong; Zitong Li; Na Li; Jinhee Hur; Cassandra Dl Fritz; William Chapman; Katelin B Nickel; Andrew Tipping; Graham A Colditz; Edward L Giovannucci; Margaret A Olsen; Ryan C Fields; Yin Cao
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 31.793

7.  Utility of the Current Procedural Terminology Codes for Prophylactic Stabilization for Defining Metastatic Femur Disease.

Authors:  Sarah M Hanna; Duncan C Ramsey; Yee C Doung; James B Hayden; Reid F Thompson; Andrew R Summers; Kenneth R Gundle
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2020-12-18

8.  Billing code algorithms to identify cases of peripheral artery disease from administrative data.

Authors:  Jin Fan; Adelaide M Arruda-Olson; Cynthia L Leibson; Carin Smith; Guanghui Liu; Kent R Bailey; Iftikhar J Kullo
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 4.497

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.