Literature DB >> 21961859

Management of incidental durotomy in minimally invasive spine surgery.

Dmitry Ruban1, John E O'Toole.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Unintended durotomy is one of the most common complications in spine surgery that may lead to serious complications if not recognized or treated properly. There are few reports on the management of durotomies incurred during minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS). The authors describe their experience in a series of consecutive MISS patients with unintended durotomies.
METHODS: All patients who underwent MISS by the senior author between August 2006 and February 2011 were retrospectively reviewed, and cases with unintended durotomies were identified. A case-control study was carried out comparing patient demographics and perioperative data between patients with and without durotomy. Surgical technique, including a proposed algorithm for management of durotomies, is described.
RESULTS: Unintended durotomy occurred in 53 (9.4%) of 563 patients. The mean age at surgery was 60.7 years (range 30-85 years). Previous surgery at the same level was performed in 5 patients (9.4%). Two patients underwent posterior cervical surgery, and 51 patients underwent posterior lumbar surgery. Decompression alone was performed in 32 patients (60.4%), and fusion was performed in 21 patients (39.6%). The mean operative time was 105 minutes in the decompression group and 310 minutes in the fusion group (p < 0.001). Estimated blood loss was 60 ml in the decompression group and 381 ml in the fusion group (p < 0.001). The hospital length of stay was 52 hours in the decompression group and 106 hours in the fusion group (p < 0.001). The mean follow-up was 310 days, and there were no cases of cutaneous CSF fistula, pseudomeningocele, or other complications referable to durotomy in either group. Risk factors identified for durotomy included previous operation at the same level (p = 0.019) and operation in the lumbar spine region (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: In the authors' consecutive series of patients undergoing MISS, an unintended durotomy was associated with fewer complications than previously reported for open spinal surgery. The authors propose a simple management algorithm that includes early mobilization and results in excellent clinical outcomes with no incidence of postoperative cutaneous CSF fistula or other complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21961859     DOI: 10.3171/2011.7.FOCUS11122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  20 in total

1.  Incidental durotomy in spine surgery: first aid in ten steps.

Authors:  Luca Papavero; Nils Engler; Ralph Kothe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Full endoscopic treatment of dural tears in lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Joachim M Oertel; Benedikt W Burkhardt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-20       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Combined thrombin and autologous blood for repair of lumbar durotomy.

Authors:  Wael Mohamed Mohamed Moussa; Hisham A Aboul-Enein
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 4.  Spinal dura mater: biophysical characteristics relevant to medical device development.

Authors:  Sean J Nagel; Chandan G Reddy; Leonardo A Frizon; Matthieu K Chardon; Marshall Holland; Andre G Machado; George T Gillies; Matthew A Howard; Saul Wilson
Journal:  J Med Eng Technol       Date:  2018-03-23

5.  Incidental dural tear in spine surgery: analysis of a nationwide database.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Yoshihara; Daisuke Yoneoka
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Complication avoidance and management in ambulatory spine surgery.

Authors:  Evan D Sheha; Peter B Derman
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

7.  Safe Discharge of Patients From an Ambulatory Care Center After Incidental Durotomy During Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Thomas L Francavilla; Michael C Weiss; Reginald Davis
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-08-31

8.  Watertightness of wound closure in lumbar spine-a comparison of different techniques.

Authors:  Aline Suter; José Miguel Spirig; Paolo Fornaciari; Elias Bachmann; Tobias Götschi; Karina Klein; Mazda Farshad
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

9.  Suitability of Administrative Databases for Durotomy Incidence Assessment: Comparison to the Incidence Associated With Bone-Removal Devices, Calculated Using a Systemic Literature Review and Clinical Data.

Authors:  Robert Pflugmacher; Angelo Franzini; Shaked Horovitz; Richard Guyer; Ely Ashkenazi
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-31

10.  An Investigation of a Novel Dural Repair Device for Intraoperative Incidental Durotomy Repair.

Authors:  Kartik Shenoy; Chester J Donnally; Evan D Sheha; Krishn Khanna; Srinivas K Prasad
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.