Literature DB >> 21961468

Geographic disparities in state and district policies targeting youth obesity.

Daniel R Taber1, Jamie F Chriqui, Frank J Chaloupka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: States and school districts nationwide have enacted policies targeting youth obesity, but many policies lack specific requirements or enforcement language. Geographic disparities in youth obesity could worsen if policies are weaker in areas with higher obesity prevalence.
PURPOSE: To determine if state or district policy strength varies with youth obesity prevalence across Census divisions.
METHODS: Policies in five domains related to nutrition and physical activity in schools were obtained from all states and nationally representative samples of 578 and 592 public school districts in the 2006-2007 and 2008-2009 school years, respectively. Policy language strength was rated on a 0-100 scale on both the state and district level. Regression models were used to determine if mean 2006-2007 strength scores, and changes in mean scores from 2006-2007 to 2008-2009, were associated with youth obesity prevalence across Census divisions. Analyses were conducted in 2010.
RESULTS: State and district policies governing foods sold outside of school meal programs ("competitive foods") were stronger in 2006-2007 in the two divisions with the highest youth obesity prevalence (East South Central, West South Central). Furthermore, mean competitive food policy strength increased the most from 2006-2007 to 2008-2009 in these divisions. The West South Central had the weakest district physical education policies in 2006-2007, however, and was the only division in which average strength of district school meal policies decreased.
CONCLUSIONS: State and districts in Census divisions with the highest youth obesity prevalence are taking steps to restrict competitive foods in schools, but many have not targeted other policy domains as aggressively.
Copyright © 2011 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21961468     DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.06.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  6 in total

1.  Cross-sector analysis of socioeconomic, racial/ethnic, and urban/rural disparities in food policy enactment in the United States.

Authors:  Daniel R Taber; Jamie F Chriqui; Christopher M Quinn; Leah M Rimkus; Frank J Chaloupka
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 4.078

2.  Development of the policy indicator checklist: a tool to identify and measure policies for calorie-dense foods and sugar-sweetened beverages across multiple settings.

Authors:  Rebecca E Lee; Allen M Hallett; Nathan Parker; Ousswa Kudia; Dennis Kao; Maria Modelska; Hanadi Rifai; Daniel P O'Connor
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The role of family and community involvement in the development and implementation of school nutrition and physical activity policy.

Authors:  Rebecca Kehm; Cynthia S Davey; Marilyn S Nanney
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.118

4.  Change in school nutrition-related laws from 2003 to 2008: evidence from the school nutrition-environment state policy classification system.

Authors:  Louise C Mâsse; Frank Perna; Tanya Agurs-Collins; Jamie F Chriqui
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Rural disparities in the distribution of policies that support healthy eating in US secondary schools.

Authors:  Marilyn S Nanney; Cynthia S Davey; Martha Y Kubik
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.910

6.  Healthier fundraising in U. S. elementary schools: associations between policies at the state, district, and school levels.

Authors:  Lindsey Turner; Jamie F Chriqui; Frank J Chaloupka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.