Literature DB >> 21960007

Analysis of substrate specificity of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Mag1 alkylpurine DNA glycosylase.

Suraj Adhikary1, Brandt F Eichman.   

Abstract

DNA glycosylases specialized for the repair of alkylation damage must identify, with fine specificity, a diverse array of subtle modifications within DNA. The current mechanism involves damage sensing through interrogation of the DNA duplex, followed by more specific recognition of the target base inside the active site pocket. To better understand the physical basis for alkylpurine detection, we determined the crystal structure of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Mag1 (spMag1) in complex with DNA and performed a mutational analysis of spMag1 and the close homologue from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (scMag). Despite strong homology, spMag1 and scMag differ in substrate specificity and cellular alkylation sensitivity, although the enzymological basis for their functional differences is unknown. We show that Mag preference for 1,N(6)-ethenoadenine (ɛA) is influenced by a minor groove-interrogating residue more than the composition of the nucleobase-binding pocket. Exchanging this residue between Mag proteins swapped their ɛA activities, providing evidence that residues outside the extrahelical base-binding pocket have a role in identification of a particular modification in addition to sensing damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21960007      PMCID: PMC3245690          DOI: 10.1038/embor.2011.189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO Rep        ISSN: 1469-221X            Impact factor:   8.807


  30 in total

Review 1.  A mechanistic perspective on the chemistry of DNA repair glycosylases.

Authors:  James T Stivers; Yu Lin Jiang
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 2.  Site-specific DNA damage recognition by enzyme-induced base flipping.

Authors:  James T Stivers
Journal:  Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol       Date:  2004

3.  Structural basis for the excision repair of alkylation-damaged DNA.

Authors:  J Labahn; O D Schärer; A Long; K Ezaz-Nikpay; G L Verdine; T E Ellenberger
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-07-26       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Cloning and characterization of a cDNA encoding a 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase from the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Authors:  A Memisoglu; L Samson
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1996-10-24       Impact factor: 3.688

5.  Escherichia coli, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, rat and human 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylases repair 1,N6-ethenoadenine when present in DNA.

Authors:  M Saparbaev; K Kleibl; J Laval
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1995-09-25       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  The determination of urinary 3-methyladenine in humans as a potential monitor of exposure to methylating agents.

Authors:  D E Shuker; E Bailey; A Parry; J Lamb; P B Farmer
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 4.944

7.  Effects of hydrogen bonding within a damaged base pair on the activity of wild type and DNA-intercalating mutants of human alkyladenine DNA glycosylase.

Authors:  Aarthy C Vallur; Joyce A Feller; Clint W Abner; Robert K Tran; Linda B Bloom
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-06-19       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Induction of S.cerevisiae MAG 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase transcript levels in response to DNA damage.

Authors:  J Chen; L Samson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1991-12-11       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  The Escherichia coli 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase AlkA has a remarkably versatile active site.

Authors:  Patrick J O'Brien; Tom Ellenberger
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase has homology to the AlkA glycosylase of E. coli and is induced in response to DNA alkylation damage.

Authors:  J Chen; B Derfler; L Samson
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances in the structural mechanisms of DNA glycosylases.

Authors:  Sonja C Brooks; Suraj Adhikary; Emily H Rubinson; Brandt F Eichman
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-10-14

2.  Non-productive DNA damage binding by DNA glycosylase-like protein Mag2 from Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Authors:  Suraj Adhikary; Marilyn C Cato; Kriston L McGary; Antonis Rokas; Brandt F Eichman
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2012-12-28

3.  Sculpting of DNA at abasic sites by DNA glycosylase homolog mag2.

Authors:  Bjørn Dalhus; Line Nilsen; Hanne Korvald; Joy Huffman; Rune Johansen Forstrøm; Cynthia T McMurray; Ingrun Alseth; John A Tainer; Magnar Bjørås
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 5.006

4.  An HPLC-tandem mass spectrometry method for simultaneous detection of alkylated base excision repair products.

Authors:  Elwood A Mullins; Emily H Rubinson; Kevin N Pereira; M Wade Calcutt; Plamen P Christov; Brandt F Eichman
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 3.608

5.  The DNA glycosylase AlkD uses a non-base-flipping mechanism to excise bulky lesions.

Authors:  Elwood A Mullins; Rongxin Shi; Zachary D Parsons; Philip K Yuen; Sheila S David; Yasuhiro Igarashi; Brandt F Eichman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Interplay between base excision repair activity and toxicity of 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylases in an E. coli complementation system.

Authors:  Christopher J Troll; Suraj Adhikary; Marie Cueff; Ileena Mitra; Brandt F Eichman; Manel Camps
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 2.433

7.  Expansion of base excision repair compensates for a lack of DNA repair by oxidative dealkylation in budding yeast.

Authors:  Suzanne J Admiraal; Daniel E Eyler; Michael R Baldwin; Emily M Brines; Christopher T Lohans; Christopher J Schofield; Patrick J O'Brien
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  A conserved loop-wedge motif moderates reaction site search and recognition by FEN1.

Authors:  Mark J Thompson; Victoria J B Gotham; Barbara Ciani; Jane A Grasby
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 16.971

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.