Literature DB >> 21958789

Continuous flow left ventricular assist device outcomes in commercial use compared with the prior clinical trial.

Ranjit John1, Yoshifumi Naka, Nicholas G Smedira, Randall Starling, Ulrich Jorde, Peter Eckman, David J Farrar, Francis D Pagani.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A multicenter clinical trial conducted from 2005 to 2008 of a continuous flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) resulted in Food and Drug Administration approval for bridge to transplantation. The purpose of this analysis was to determine changes in posttrial outcomes in widespread commercial use since the clinical trial.
METHODS: We compared outcomes of 486 patients who received a continuous flow LVAD as a bridge to transplantation at 36 centers during the clinical trial (March 2005 to April 2008) with outcomes of 1,496 posttrial patients who received a continuous flow LVAD at 83 centers (April 2008 to September 2010 as reported to the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support).
RESULTS: Baseline data were comparable between groups. Cumulative follow-up was 511 and 1,082 patient-years for trial and posttrial patients, respectively, and average support duration was 12.6 ± 14.0 and 8.7 ± 7.1 months. Kaplan-Meier survival improved at 1 year from 76% (trial) to 85% (posttrial). The percentage of patients undergoing transplantation in the first year decreased from 48% in the trial period to 39% in the posttrial period. Quality of life metrics improved by 3 months in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The survival rate of a large group of continuous flow LVAD patients in a real-world setting after Food and Drug Administration market approval for bridge to transplantation has improved since the clinical trial. These data show that excellent outcomes have been maintained with dissemination of new LVAD technology from a clinical trial phase to more broad based use in the period after market approval.
Copyright © 2011 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21958789     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.05.080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  24 in total

1.  UNOS status of heart transplant patients supported with a left ventricular assist device: is it time to reconsider the status criteria?

Authors:  Mark S Slaughter
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2011

Review 2.  Impact of adverse events on ventricular assist device outcomes.

Authors:  Aleksandar Adzic; Snehal R Patel; Simon Maybaum
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2013-03

3.  Results of the prospective multicenter Japanese bridge to transplant study with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Shunei Kyo; Minoru Ono; Yoshiki Sawa; Takeshi Nakatani; Koichi Tabayashi; Yoshikatsu Saiki; Ryuji Tominaga
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 4.  Renal dysfunction and chronic mechanical circulatory support: from patient selection to long-term management and prognosis.

Authors:  Meredith A Brisco; Jeffrey M Testani; Jennifer L Cook
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.161

5.  How to cope with a temporarily aborted transplant program: solutions for a prolonged waiting period.

Authors:  Frédéric Vanden Eynden; Martine Antoine; Bachar El Oumeiri; Marie-Luce Chirade; Jean-Luc Vachiéry; Guido J Van Nooten
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-11

6.  Mechanical circulatory support devices as destination therapy-current evidence.

Authors:  Thomas Puehler; Stephan Ensminger; Michael Schoenbrodt; Jochen Börgermann; Erik Rehn; Kavous Hakim-Meibodi; Michiel Morshuis; Jan Gummert
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-09

7.  Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  John C O'Horo; Omar M Abu Saleh; John M Stulak; Mark P Wilhelm; Larry M Baddour; M Rizwan Sohail
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2018 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 8.  Clinical outcomes after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: a systematic review.

Authors:  Colleen K McIlvennan; Kate H Magid; Amrut V Ambardekar; Jocelyn S Thompson; Daniel D Matlock; Larry A Allen
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 9.  Left ventricular assist devices as a bridge to cardiac transplantation.

Authors:  Christopher T Holley; Laura Harvey; Ranjit John
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Development of a novel echocardiography ramp test for speed optimization and diagnosis of device thrombosis in continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: the Columbia ramp study.

Authors:  Nir Uriel; Kerry A Morrison; Arthur R Garan; Tomoko S Kato; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Farhana Latif; Susan W Restaino; Donna M Mancini; Margaret Flannery; Hiroo Takayama; Ranjit John; Paolo C Colombo; Yoshifumi Naka; Ulrich P Jorde
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 24.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.