Literature DB >> 21958729

Expression of HER2neu in ductal carcinoma in situ is associated with local recurrence.

K Han1, S Nofech-Mozes, S Narod, W Hanna, D Vesprini, R Saskin, C Taylor, I Kong, L Paszat, E Rakovitch.   

Abstract

AIMS: Determination of the risk of recurrence after local excision of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains a challenge. Molecular profiling based on immunohistochemical staining to oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and HER2neu improved risk prediction in invasive breast cancer, but few studies have evaluated if molecular classification of DCIS predicts local recurrence. We evaluated the expression of ER, PR and HER2neu in DCIS to determine if molecular classification predicts local recurrence after breast-conserving therapy for DCIS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of patients with DCIS treated between 1987 and 2000, carried out a pathology review and immunohistochemical staining for ER, PR and HER2neu and categorised cases into four molecular phenotypes [luminal A (ER+ and/or PR+, HER2neu-), luminal B (ER+ and/or PR+, HER2neu+), HER2neu subtype (ER-, PR-, HER2neu+), triple negative (ER-, PR-, HER2neu-)]. We evaluated the association between the molecular subtype and the development of local recurrence.
RESULTS: In total, 180 cases of DCIS were included in the study (luminal A, n=113; luminal B, n=25; HER2neu type, n=29; triple negative, n=13). The median follow-up time was 8.7 years. We observed higher rates of local recurrence among luminal B (40%) and HER2neu type (38%) DCIS compared with luminal A (21%) and triple negative (15%) DCIS. On multivariable analysis, HER2neu overexpression was associated with an increased risk of local recurrence (hazard ratio=1.98; 95% confidence interval: 1.11, 3.53, P=0.02).
CONCLUSION: HER2neu expression in DCIS is a significant predictor of local recurrence, whereas luminal A and triple negative phenotypes are associated with relatively low risks of local recurrence.
Copyright © 2011 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21958729     DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2011.09.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)        ISSN: 0936-6555            Impact factor:   4.126


  20 in total

1.  Breast conservation therapy for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS): does presentation of disease affect long-term outcomes?

Authors:  Harrison X Bai; Sabin B Motwani; Susan A Higgins; Bruce G Haffty; Lynn D Wilson; Donald R Lannin; Suzanne B Evans; Meena S Moran
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Comparison of HER2 amplification status among breast cancer subgroups offers new insights in pathways of breast cancer progression.

Authors:  Kathleen Lambein; Mieke Van Bockstal; Lies Vandemaele; Rudy Van den Broecke; Veronique Cocquyt; Sofie Geenen; Hannelore Denys; Louis Libbrecht
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Can dedicated breast PET help to reduce overdiagnosis and overtreatment by differentiating between indolent and potentially aggressive ductal carcinoma in situ?

Authors:  Lucía Graña-López; Michel Herranz; Inés Domínguez-Prado; Sonia Argibay; Ángeles Villares; Manuel Vázquez-Caruncho
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Molecular Markers as Prognostic Factors in DCIS and Small Invasive Breast Cancers.

Authors:  N Sänger; K Engels; A Graf; E Ruckhäberle; K E Effenberger; T Fehm; U Holtrich; S Becker; T Karn
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 5.  Next-generation sequencing: a powerful tool for the discovery of molecular markers in breast ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Hitchintan Kaur; Shihong Mao; Seema Shah; David H Gorski; Stephen A Krawetz; Bonnie F Sloane; Raymond R Mattingly
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.225

6.  Histopathological characterization of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast according to HER2 amplification status and molecular subtype.

Authors:  Mieke Van Bockstal; Kathleen Lambein; Hannelore Denys; Geert Braems; Ann Nuyts; Rudy Van den Broecke; Veronique Cocquyt; Olivier De Wever; Louis Libbrecht
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-06-29       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Mammographic features of calcifications in DCIS: correlation with oestrogen receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status.

Authors:  Min Sun Bae; Woo Kyung Moon; Jung Min Chang; Nariya Cho; So Yeon Park; Jae-Kyung Won; Yoon-Kyung Jeon; Hyeong-Gon Moon; Wonshik Han; In Ae Park
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Prognostic and Predictive Value of HER2 Expression in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ: Results from the UK/ANZ DCIS Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Mangesh A Thorat; Pauline M Levey; J Louise Jones; Sarah E Pinder; Nigel J Bundred; Ian S Fentiman; Jack Cuzick
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Lapatinib inhibits stem/progenitor proliferation in preclinical in vitro models of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

Authors:  Gillian Farnie; Rachael L Johnson; Kathryn E Williams; Robert B Clarke; Nigel J Bundred
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 4.534

10.  Basal cytokeratin as a potential marker of low risk of invasion in ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Fernando N Aguiar; Henrique N Mendes; Cinthya S Cirqueira; Carlos E Bacchi; Filomena M Carvalho
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.