Literature DB >> 21958669

Studies on neutral, cationic and biotinylated cationic microbubbles in enhancing ultrasound-mediated gene delivery in vitro and in vivo.

Nikolitsa Nomikou1, Poonam Tiwari, Tanvi Trehan, Kriti Gulati, Anthony P McHale.   

Abstract

Ultrasound-mediated gene transfer is emerging as a practical means of facilitating targeted gene expression and is significantly enhanced in the presence of exogenously added microbubbles. This study explores the influence of microbubble surface modifications on their interaction with plasmid DNA and target cells, and the functional consequences of those interactions in terms of ultrasound-mediated gene transfer. Polyethylene glycol-stabilized, lipid-shelled microbubbles with neutral (SDM201), cationic (SDM202) and biotinylated cationic (SDM302) surfaces were compared in terms of their abilities to interact with a luciferase-encoding reporter plasmid DNA and with target cells in vitro. The results demonstrate that the biotinylated cationic microbubble>cationic microbubble>neutral microbubble, in terms of their abilities to interact with target cells and to enhance ultrasound-mediated gene transfer, particularly at low microbubble concentration. The presence of a net positive charge on both cationic microbubbles promoted the formation of microbubble-nucleic acid complexes, although preformation of the complexes prior to addition to target cells inhibited the interaction between the microbubbles and target cells in vitro. The impact of these findings on potential in vitro or ex vivo therapeutic applications of microbubble-enhanced ultrasound-mediated gene transfer is discussed. All three microbubble preparations could be used to facilitate gene transfer in vivo and the potential advantages associated with the use of the cationic microbubbles for targeted gene delivery are discussed. Crown
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21958669     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  25 in total

1.  Cationic versus neutral microbubbles for ultrasound-mediated gene delivery in cancer.

Authors:  David S Wang; Cedric Panje; Marybeth A Pysz; Ramasamy Paulmurugan; Jarrett Rosenberg; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Michel Schneider; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Reverse engineering the ultrasound contrast agent.

Authors:  Mark A Borden; Kang-Ho Song
Journal:  Adv Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 12.984

Review 3.  Ultrasonic technologies in imaging and drug delivery.

Authors:  Yi-Ju Ho; Chih-Chung Huang; Ching-Hsiang Fan; Hao-Li Liu; Chih-Kuang Yeh
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  Removal of ligand-bound liposomes from cell surfaces by microbubbles exposed to ultrasound.

Authors:  Stuart Ibsen; Ruben Mora; Guixin Shi; Carolyn Schutt; Wenjin Cui; Michael Benchimol; Viviana Serra; Sadik Esener
Journal:  J Biol Phys       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 1.365

5.  Multiparameter evaluation of in vivo gene delivery using ultrasound-guided, microbubble-enhanced sonoporation.

Authors:  Galina Shapiro; Andrew W Wong; Maxim Bez; Fang Yang; Sarah Tam; Lisa Even; Dmitriy Sheyn; Shiran Ben-David; Wafa Tawackoli; Gadi Pelled; Katherine W Ferrara; Dan Gazit
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 9.776

6.  Development of therapeutic microbubbles for enhancing ultrasound-mediated gene delivery.

Authors:  Ryan R Sun; Misty L Noble; Samuel S Sun; Shuxian Song; Carol H Miao
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 7.  Drug and gene delivery across the blood-brain barrier with focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Kelsie F Timbie; Brian P Mead; Richard J Price
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 8.  Current status and prospects for microbubbles in ultrasound theranostics.

Authors:  K Heath Martin; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2013-03-15

Review 9.  Advances in ultrasound mediated gene therapy using microbubble contrast agents.

Authors:  Shashank R Sirsi; Mark A Borden
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 11.556

10.  Ultrasound-mediated gene delivery with cationic versus neutral microbubbles: effect of DNA and microbubble dose on in vivo transfection efficiency.

Authors:  Cedric M Panje; David S Wang; Marybeth A Pysz; Ramasamy Paulmurugan; Ying Ren; Francois Tranquart; Lu Tian; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 11.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.