Literature DB >> 21958623

How different are the local field potentials and spiking activities? Insights from multi-electrodes arrays.

Quentin Gaucher1, Jean-Marc Edeline, Boris Gourévitch.   

Abstract

Simultaneous recording of multiple neurons, or neuron groups, offers new promise for investigating fundamental questions about the neural code. We used arrays of 16 electrodes in the tonotopic, primary, auditory cortex of guinea pigs and we extracted LFP- and spike-based spectro-temporal receptive fields (STRFs). We confirm here that LFP signals provide broadly tuned activity which lacks frequency resolution compared to multiunit signals and, therefore, lead to large redundancy in neural responses even between recording sites far apart. Thanks to the use of multi-electrode arrays which allows simultaneous recordings, we also focused on functional relationships between neuronal discharges (through cross-correlations) and between LFPs (through coherence). Since the LFP is composed of distinct brain rhythms, the LFP results were split into three frequency bands from the slowest to the fastest components of LFPs. For driven as well as spontaneous activity, we show that components >70 Hz in LFPs are much less coherent between recording sites than slower components. In general, coherence between LFPs from two recordings sites is positively correlated with the degree of frequency overlap between the two corresponding STRFs, similar to cross-correlation between multiunit activities. However, coherence is only weakly correlated with cross-correlation in all frequency ranges. Altogether, these results suggest that LFPs reflect global functional connectivity in the thalamocortical auditory system whereas spiking activities reflect more independent local processing.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21958623     DOI: 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2011.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol Paris        ISSN: 0928-4257


  20 in total

1.  Stimulus-specific effects of noradrenaline in auditory cortex: implications for the discrimination of communication sounds.

Authors:  Quentin Gaucher; Jean-Marc Edeline
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Cortical inhibition reduces information redundancy at presentation of communication sounds in the primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Quentin Gaucher; Chloé Huetz; Boris Gourévitch; Jean-Marc Edeline
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Quantitative basis for neuroimaging of cortical laminae with calibrated functional MRI.

Authors:  Peter Herman; Basavaraju G Sanganahalli; Hal Blumenfeld; Douglas L Rothman; Fahmeed Hyder
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-08-26       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Robust Neuronal Discrimination in Primary Auditory Cortex Despite Degradations of Spectro-temporal Acoustic Details: Comparison Between Guinea Pigs with Normal Hearing and Mild Age-Related Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Yonane Aushana; Samira Souffi; Jean-Marc Edeline; Christian Lorenzi; Chloé Huetz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-01-04

5.  Evoked Response Strength in Primary Auditory Cortex Predicts Performance in a Spectro-Spatial Discrimination Task in Rats.

Authors:  Elena Gronskaya; Wolfger von der Behrens
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The olivocochlear reflex strength and cochlear sensitivity are independently modulated by auditory cortex microstimulation.

Authors:  Constantino D Dragicevic; Cristian Aedo; Alex León; Macarena Bowen; Natalia Jara; Gonzalo Terreros; Luis Robles; Paul H Delano
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-02-07

7.  Noise-Sensitive But More Precise Subcortical Representations Coexist with Robust Cortical Encoding of Natural Vocalizations.

Authors:  Samira Souffi; Christian Lorenzi; Léo Varnet; Chloé Huetz; Jean-Marc Edeline
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Robustness of cortical topography across fields, laminae, anesthetic states, and neurophysiological signal types.

Authors:  Wei Guo; Anna R Chambers; Keith N Darrow; Kenneth E Hancock; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Second spatial derivative analysis of cortical surface potentials recorded in cat primary auditory cortex using thin film surface arrays: Comparisons with multi-unit data.

Authors:  James B Fallon; Sam Irving; Satinderpall S Pannu; Angela C Tooker; Andrew K Wise; Robert K Shepherd; Dexter R F Irvine
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  Sparse Spectro-Temporal Receptive Fields Based on Multi-Unit and High-Gamma Responses in Human Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Rick L Jenison; Richard A Reale; Amanda L Armstrong; Hiroyuki Oya; Hiroto Kawasaki; Matthew A Howard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.